By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Samsung Galaxy S3 thread

 

Are you getting a galaxy S3

Yes 22 35.48%
 
No 10 16.13%
 
Staying with Iphone 12 19.35%
 
Staying with other phone 15 24.19%
 
Total:59
VetteDude said:
superchunk said:
VetteDude said:

Galaxy Nexus is even more outdated.

You are recommending hardware without knowing what SoC is? Its the System on a Chip, the main chip that includes the processor, GPU, and sometimes the RAM and cellular modem. The GNex uses an older OMAP SoC which has never been bleeding edge, especially compared to Samsung's own Exynos or Qualcomm's Snapdragon chips. The Exynos Dual in the GS2, the Exynos Quad in the GS3, and the Snapdragon S4 or Nvidia Tegra 3 in the HTC One series are VASTLY superior chips.

GNex has a slightly worse CPU/GPU and cameras... yes.

However, it has a better screen, better battery, better software (no touchwiz).

Even if S2 was on Verizon, I would have picked it over the S2 any day.


Same number of pixels, just the GS3 has a bigger screen and doesn't have a funky curve. The battery size may be bigger but we don't know the battery life yet. The Exynos 4 is a 32nm part, the OMAP 4 is a 45nm part and the Gnex has a power sucking 1st-gen LTE chipset. Software is definitely a plus of the Gnex, but the Verizon version still doesn't get timely updates and Touchwiz is the best skin, and the new GS3 version of Touchwiz is a lot more stock-y than previous versions, just adds more color to Android. 

 

And the Gnex doesn't have a MicroSD slot.

S2 has 4.3" 800x400 resolution. Gnex has 4.65" 1280x720 and 316ppi. Clearly a far better screen.

Battery is larger with a similar core product and a lighter OS(no touchwhiz). Gnex should definitely have the better battery life. (when comparing on same network and both have GSM and LTE variations)

Verizon version is on ICS as is some of the S2's. The difference isn't Verizon but LTE. The GSM Gnex has the 4.0.4 version. Plus, touchwhiz is a bigger hit than any minor version update.

If S2 gets touchwhiz 4, then yeah idk, I've read its far better than previous versions and that maybe mostly due to it being far less changes to the core OS.

Lack of SD slot is meh. It has a 32GB built in storage. More than enough. Especially when you include the endless free storage I have with Google services.



Around the Network
mothman said:

If I hadn't purchased the Samsung Galaxy II 4G a few months back I would have said yes but as it is I'll be happy with the one I have (Now with ICS on it) for the forseeable future. I love the G II 4G by the way. :)

I was about to buy the Xperia Play and after asking for advice here on vgchartz I decided for the Galaxy II, too. I am not thinking about upgrading any time soon but I am so glad with my purchase that I might get a Galaxy III when the time is right.



NintendoPie said:
VetteDude said:

 

And the Gnex doesn't have a MicroSD slot.

That seems to be becoming the trend.


Galaxy S3 has MicroSD and removable battery. So does Sprints Evo 4g LTE coming up. If Samsung can make a phone with removable battery and MicroSD, then HTC should be able to (One series, I'm looking at you) as should Moto (Razr).



superchunk said:
VetteDude said:
superchunk said:
VetteDude said:

Galaxy Nexus is even more outdated.

You are recommending hardware without knowing what SoC is? Its the System on a Chip, the main chip that includes the processor, GPU, and sometimes the RAM and cellular modem. The GNex uses an older OMAP SoC which has never been bleeding edge, especially compared to Samsung's own Exynos or Qualcomm's Snapdragon chips. The Exynos Dual in the GS2, the Exynos Quad in the GS3, and the Snapdragon S4 or Nvidia Tegra 3 in the HTC One series are VASTLY superior chips.

GNex has a slightly worse CPU/GPU and cameras... yes.

However, it has a better screen, better battery, better software (no touchwiz).

Even if S2 was on Verizon, I would have picked it over the S2 any day.


Same number of pixels, just the GS3 has a bigger screen and doesn't have a funky curve. The battery size may be bigger but we don't know the battery life yet. The Exynos 4 is a 32nm part, the OMAP 4 is a 45nm part and the Gnex has a power sucking 1st-gen LTE chipset. Software is definitely a plus of the Gnex, but the Verizon version still doesn't get timely updates and Touchwiz is the best skin, and the new GS3 version of Touchwiz is a lot more stock-y than previous versions, just adds more color to Android. 

S2 has 4.3" 800x400 resolution. Gnex has 4.65" 1280x720 and 316ppi. Clearly a far better screen.

Battery is larger with a similar core product and a lighter OS(no touchwhiz). Gnex should definitely have the better battery life. (when comparing on same network and both have GSM and LTE variations)

Verizon version is on ICS as is some of the S2's. The difference isn't Verizon but LTE. The GSM Gnex has the 4.0.4 version. Plus, touchwhiz is a bigger hit than any minor version update.

If S2 gets touchwhiz 4, then yeah idk, I've read its far better than previous versions and that maybe mostly due to it being far less changes to the core OS.

I'm sorry, I switched to comparing the Gnex to GS3 instead of the GS2.

 

The GS2 screen is REAL pixels (RGB) while the Gnex and GS3 'cheat' with pentile (the 720p isn't actually 720p because of the way the subpixels are arranged).

 

Cloud storage never replaces physical storage.



VetteDude said:
NintendoPie said:
VetteDude said:

 

And the Gnex doesn't have a MicroSD slot.

That seems to be becoming the trend.


Galaxy S3 has MicroSD and removable battery. So does Sprints Evo 4g LTE coming up. If Samsung can make a phone with removable battery and MicroSD, then HTC should be able to (One series, I'm looking at you) as should Moto (Razr).

MicroSD doesn't matter much now.

Google has free storage of 20,000 songs, unlimited pictures/videos (google+), and free 5GB on Drive. Plus tons of other free storage on other 3rd party products.

16GB that's base on most phones is more than enough.



Around the Network
VetteDude said:


Galaxy S3 has MicroSD and removable battery. So does Sprints Evo 4g LTE coming up. If Samsung can make a phone with removable battery and MicroSD, then HTC should be able to (One series, I'm looking at you) as should Moto (Razr).

I don't know what the big fuss is. All they need to do is make a 16 GB and a 32 GB Model then they would be fine. No need for microSD Cards.



VetteDude said:

I'm sorry, I switched to comparing the Gnex to GS3 instead of the GS2.

 

The GS2 screen is REAL pixels (RGB) while the Gnex and GS3 'cheat' with pentile (the 720p isn't actually 720p because of the way the subpixels are arranged).

 

Cloud storage never replaces physical storage

S3 is better than Gnex. No argument there.

CHeating or not... compare the screens in real life. GNex is better than S2.

I prefer cloud storage. I'm moving all my stuff to it since Drive was introduced. I have zero reason to store it on my actual phone and my PC is the only other physcial back-up I require. Otherwise having it in Google's cloud is perfect for any other occasion.



superchunk said:
VetteDude said:
NintendoPie said:
VetteDude said:

 

And the Gnex doesn't have a MicroSD slot.

That seems to be becoming the trend.


Galaxy S3 has MicroSD and removable battery. So does Sprints Evo 4g LTE coming up. If Samsung can make a phone with removable battery and MicroSD, then HTC should be able to (One series, I'm looking at you) as should Moto (Razr).

MicroSD doesn't matter much now.

Google has free storage of 20,000 songs, unlimited pictures/videos (google+), and free 5GB on Drive. Plus tons of other free storage on other 3rd party products.

16GB that's base on most phones is more than enough.

Those 20,000 songs are also streamed at a lower bitrate and use data which counts againsts peoples caps (I have unlimited). Google+ is pretty dumb and is a LOT slower than QuickPic, and 5GB isn't anything compared to the 64GB MicroSD cards they have now. Those 3rd party are not reliable, Cloud companies close, if you read tech sites often you can see some close down every once in a while, normally with short notice to get your stuff out of there. I want copies of everything I own on MY harddrives. Thus why I refuse to use OnLive for games.

 

I'm not against cloud storage at all, but right now it is not mature enough for me to rely on. And for my next phone which I'll have for 2 years I want a MicroSD slot, that's just my opinion. Then 2 years down the road I'll reevaluate after 2 years of using a mix of cloud and SD storage (as I do now).



VetteDude said:

Those 20,000 songs are also streamed at a lower bitrate and use data which counts againsts peoples caps (I have unlimited). Google+ is pretty dumb and is a LOT slower than QuickPic, and 5GB isn't anything compared to the 64GB MicroSD cards they have now. Those 3rd party are not reliable, Cloud companies close, if you read tech sites often you can see some close down every once in a while, normally with short notice to get your stuff out of there. I want copies of everything I own on MY harddrives. Thus why I refuse to use OnLive for games.


Data limits I guess is the only real argument against cloud. However, wifi is free all over and home and you can pin songs or playlists and other content to your phone for non-data needs. Additionally, ICS makes it idiot proof to never go over your data limits. (I also have unlimited)  Bitrate is like 3hundred something. Its pretty high and sounds good to me.

G+ is awesome and better than FB. I wish more people would use it. The auto image/video upload feature is perfect. I can even download easy and share with family automatically (or any circle).... even allow them to copy or not.

5GB on Drive for docs and other stuff is perfectly fine. Its also free vs the cost of a 64GB card. Additionally, its just for the random stuff I'd want on my phone outside of my PC at home or to back-up. Its more than enough. Plus, I never have to worry about it breaking and being lost. Google is not closing. If they decide to turn off their service, like with others in the past (app maker, sketch it, etc), I will have time to save it to my PC without issue.... where I also have it all copied anyways.

We're talking about SD cards ... not harddrives. Mobile access not PC access.

Google's cloud services combined with the default 16GB storage in any phone sold today is MORE than enough. Removing the SD card simplifies the overall product and removes one potential item to break, lose, or have stolen. Then add in the fact that the Google services are just an extension of your home PC... and what else could you possibly worry about?



pezus said:
NintendoPie said:
Oh... I forgot to post my opinion. XD

Just got the HTC One S yesterday, quite nice phone. I'll have to wait till 2014 to get another.

What?! Why so soon?

What? What so soon?