zero129 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
DirtyP2002 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
"It's all about quality; it's never been a game of quantity versus quality."
"First party's role is to really be pioneers," he says -- to "really be a showcase for what the platform's capabilities are."
"That's the way we look at it," he says: "showcases for what the platform's capable of."
Answers to the top three quotes then I'll go back to my party chat:
1. Quantity was what you were going for, but failed to deliver ever since the first Xbox. Stay in the safe zone where you belong.
2. You've pioneered nothing but online. Online was inevitable for consoles and MS was the only one who could do it properly. In fact it was planned since the genesis days.
3. So basically a poor mans PC experience is what you want to show off, rather than something that shows off the 360? There is no exclusive that does this outside of Forza 4. The only graphical marvels the 360 has are already on PC where they natively show off their power. Come on Microsoft, show that you're a gaming company and not just a typical publisher.
|
finally your true face.
I read through the thread and you really came up with a lot of nonsense. MS losing money with first party studios? They reported a gigantic profit in a time they opened 3 studios and bought Twisted Pixel.
The 360 library is the most diverse of all three IMO. A lot of core titles from 1st and 3rd party, a lot of casual titles from 1st and 3rd party (some of them for Kinect, some of them with regular controls). Plus the greatest lineup ever on XBLA and Fable Heroes will prove it again, just like Alan Wake, Haunt and Crimson Dragon will.
The funny part is that you were talking about core titles at first, before you switched to "variety". In a year with games like Steel Battalion, The Witcher 2, Halo 4, Fable, Crimson Dragon, Alan Wake, Ryse, Star Wars Kinect, Kinect Rush etc etc all exclusives, your logic makes zero sense for both scenarios. Add all the multiplats like GTA V, Max Payne, CoD, Mass Effect 3, Ghost Recon Future Soldier, Resident Evil, Bioshock Infinite, Borderlands 2, Street Fighter x Tekken, Silent Hill etc. and you have barely time to play all thtese titles.
Why do quite a few PS3 fans fail to understand that the Xbox 360 is just doing fine for the past years. I don't get why people like you (or VG King) are desperately searching for something to prove that the PS3 is superior. Who do you guys want to convince anyway?
|
LOL My true face. Just say it, did I answer those quotes incorectly? Just say it.
I'm not talking about games available to PC or consoles, but to Microsoft themselves. My logic makes a whole lot of sense. The Xbox 360 experience me fromat its core is a poor mans PC experience at its core. I can admit this, because the 360 has kept from buying a PC, because all their top exclusives keep coming to the 360 or consoles, period. Even Sony is catching onto this method by Microsoft. XSN, Too Human trilogy, Ninja Blade, Project Gotham is gone, Ninety-Nine Nights and much, much more have failed. The top four games....well...top three games now are becoming fatigued.
Microsoft are throwing core gamers a bone at best. The multiplats are coming without a struggle because third party publishers want the highest profit possible. If you are a Kinect owner, the 360 is king because its exclusives are at the helm.
|
Wow, Since you're so much of a Sony Fan, what are you even doing in this thread??.
And i believe it was the PS3 that was trying to be a poor mans PC, you know with the Other OS and that, But that failed big time for them.
And MS Exclusives sell alot more then Sony Exclusives, is the're something about that, that you don't like??.
Sony's Exclusives can't even outsell the 3rd party games on their own console most of the time.
The COD games etc mostly always sells better on the 360.
Sony has been playing catch up to MS all along this gen, and thats fact..
Now to move back on topic.
I can't wait for monday to come :D .
|
Essay Pro