Rpruett said:
You're right that ANY company can fail. However, you're wrong that they are equally susceptible. There is an immense amount of resource re-shuffling and re-direction that a larger company, far more diverse company can do to survive. If for some reason Windows got over-taken in the Operating systems market in the same form of dominance that Microsoft now holds, they'd be hurting pretty tremendously since their business isn't incredibly diverse.
Wrong. Sony doesn't have a monopoly on any of their divisions. Movies, music, TVs, computers, stereos, or video games... there is plenty of worthy competition in all of those areas, many of which are losing Sony a lot of money as of late. The numbers don't lie: Billions in debt! It's not rocket science, dude. Do you really think Sony Pictures or Music is going to pour an endless amount of resources into SCE if they keep posting losses? Keep dreaming...
The Wii was a desperation strategy (Not for Marketshare), it was the cheapest next gen console they could possibly produce and represented a marginal upgrade (Even marginal by Nintendo standards). It absolutely was a desperation console.
Lol, your continuous responses just further prove that you have no idea what you're talking about. Do you really think that Nintendo was almost broke before the introduction of the Wii? They had BILLIONS in the bank; the loss that they posted this year was their first ever in the 30 years they've been in gaming, even after the Gamecube. They could have easliy gone the route of Microsoft or Sony and created a system just as powerful if they wanted to. They knew that it was not the right move for them this gen and went the Wii route to differentiate themselves from the competition, which resulted in amazing sales and tons of profit. It absolutely WAS NOT a desperation console in any way, shape or form. Try doing some research before you respond next time.
I'm not diminishing profit, what I am saying however is Nintendo doesn't scale well. Even as the far and away dominant generation leader they are currently and have been the worst selling console in 2011. With no real signs of that changing. Sony and Microsoft (But more Sony) live on more of an aggressive marketing model. The PS3 was about as bad of a launch as a system could have, between pricing, timing, software, etc. And it has rebounded to be a probably an 80 million+ in sales console atleast. Nintendo couldn't give away their Gamecube last generation.
Nobody is denying that Nintendo treated the Wii like shit in 2011, particularly in America, but the NES prospered for 7 years after it's launch in Japan before the introduction of the SNES in Japan in 1990. The Wii was not meant to have a 10 year plan like the PS3. Problem is, Sony will never recoup the losses they've suffered with the PS3 anytime in this generation, even though what they've done to turn around its sales/software is certainly commendable.
I believe Sony will never witness a generation like Nintendo has for their consoles.
If you're talking about consoles sold, I agree, although I don't believe Nintendo will ever sell less than N64 numbers again either. As far as profit (which is the basis for what this thread is about), I don't believe Nintendo will ever have the abysmal performance Sony did this gen.
When have I said that Nintendo has a worse track record? I've said numerous times that Nintendo runs their business supremely. What I am saying is that Nintendo has no margin for error or mis-steps. They have nothing beyond gaming. Like I have been saying, I think Handhelds are a dying breed right now. 5 years from now we might not even see them any longer. I would love to see Nintendo's profit from their Handhelds vs Consoles.
If handhelds were to die in the next couple of years (and I don't believe they will), that would certainly be an obstacle for Nintendo to overcome. But don't act like they haven't had any prior experience with error and mis-steps (the Virtual Boy, modest console sales in the 5th and 6th gen). They have, and despite that, they've rebounded splendidly while profiting every time. So saying they have "no margin for error" is yet another incorrect statement.
|