Lord Ciansworth said:
Kasz216 said:
It's all a matter of forcing irresponsible countries to cap spending at +10% of revenue or so, while actually enforcing it and having regulators check out all the "budget tricks" countries use to hide how much they're really spending.
|
While spending caps will be introduced in a new EU treaty next year, the seemingly perpetual recession such severe austerity would cause makes it no less likely that troubled states will be able to acquire credit from the markets at sustainable interest rates.
The European Central Bank being granted the power to operate as a 'lender of last resort' is the best solution on the table. Unfortunately Germany seems to be taking a strong stand against such a move, making it a political improbability.
|
The ECB already is a lender of last resort.
If you mean being a "Lender of Last Resort" to countries... that's a horrible idea.
All that would ensure is that there would be no incentive to actually cap your deficit spending, since the ECB will be there to bail you out anyway... and then either the countries who are responsible would either eventually get fed up and quit the union, have to impliment austeirty themselves to cover the deficit spending countries or outright Europe collapses.
The ECB as a lender of last resort doesn't solve the euro crisis, it strenghens it and just kicks the can down the road abit.
Outside which, proper caps would prevent them from aquiring such credit. Since money gained from bonds should not count towards Revenue.
As for "Perpetual recession". It wouldn't be perpetual, though it would occur until their markets shrink back to their "real" fair market value.
It's the best option out there.
The other two lead to massive collapses that take longer to recover from.