theprof00 said:
Hephaestos said:
2) An insighfull post. thanks for the honesty.
1) By negative result I mean "visited but no death", like what radish got for baal, which only says that he didn't break a neck ^^. Yes the one shot is the the theory I see as the most credible. notice how the abilities are 1 2 3 ... i'm guessing wonk had fun there, though these are also minor roles (cop is minor with 2 millers).
3) I believe we're fairly unconcered by one an other because of linkz... we saw the same reasons to lynch him, when others doubted... I'm still confident that given the info the lynch was the correct descision (the power was only revealed late... and without it's description... then again roleblocker kind of traped linkz).
4) I disagree with your notion that baal's quick answer is a proof of honesty... why would he have lied? A scum that stayed at home will just say that he stayed at home. And actually he'll be quick about it because he doesn't have the worry of keeping in the grey about having a power or not... and look at radish, his shot was watching last night, on top of his unlimited tracking, his role is important, as should be with 2 millers.
5) What i'm gonna say is a bit odd since I used it the other way against linkz... but after looking up the names in the wiki.... Does anyone besides trucks claims to have a bad guy's name as town? Hat was a charater that worked with nathan, raja was "best friends with nathan" in the past, my name is a good guy too... ABC was not such a character and was mafia... we haven't seen any real name =/= alignment. or am I mistaken on the names so far?
|
1) well well well, that's not what Radish said, though, is it? Radish never actually said that Baal visited anyone. He said no result, which means that person stayed home.
3) I don't see how any of that is not concerning. You ignore someone simply because their arguments for someone's lynch was justified? Surely there is more to be said than that. It's almost like you're saying that the lack of incriminating evidence is evidence of innocence.
4) Well, imo, if Baal is mafia, and his partner is trucks, that would have to mean trucks did the kill (unless it's some kind of magical power that can be done from home lol), which I don't think he would have, given that he was scrutized just that day. It's very fair to say that he was under suspicion and a very good target for all kinds of investigation. So, that would mean that if Baal is mafia, then someone other than Trucks is mafia, ie you or vette imo, and I don't believe that it's Vette (but maybe you do), in which case, we must simply disagree (I also kinda don't think it's you) but I'm on the border given the things you've said today. In any case I believe that if Baal had any kind of pressure on him (guilt) then he might have said that he DID go out and protect someone.
5) unfortunately, I have resorted to this as part of my evidence against Trucks, it's hard to overlook. Hat's didn't, but given his role, it kind of does.
|
1) yes and no. yes, I express myself badly ^^... visited but no info linked to a death. No radish didn't say no result, I pressed him specifically on this because his no result is actuall information.
radishhead said: I can confirm that Baal didn't do anything last night, nor was visited by anyone - I probably should have chosen a better target |
That means he was both not moving, nor targeted (besides by radish), this also tels us that Baal is not the broken neck killer, however, it doesn't exempt him from being part of the shooting group (the voices of the first night that point to mafia).
3) I don't ignore trucks... but besides his name, the only incriminating evidence is ABC... and he threaded nicely, I did believe part of his story yesterday.
4) don't forget that trucks was scrutinized because of ABC, who turned out to be mafia and not SK. On the other hand, Baal opened yesterday by a self incriminating post out of nowhere, I believe he brought himself almost as much attention as trucks got from ABC.
5) I take that as a confirmation of the trend.