By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - VGC's Mafia Round 33 Uncharted Mayhem

Linkzmax said:
EBWOP: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4226400

"I will have a random order generated that I will keep to myself. If when someone roleclaims if the list is on something that wouldn't apply to that player I bump them to next item on the list that would apply."

yeah that's the very sentence that makes the rule broken if there is a miller in the game ^^



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Around the Network

Also, we've got a good first day going on. One of the best in a while, it would be foolish to let it end on a timelimit.

Vote: Time extension



Signature goes here!

hatmoza said:
Hephaestos said:
Linkzmax said:
Last time I'll discuss my non-penalized issue. Do you guys think if everyone claimed Town/Townie/Pro-town/whatever the PMs say that as the penalty cycled through the list we could confirm 2 or 3 of the 8 or 9 townies by their loss of vote? It's an exploit which doesn't belong in this game or any other.

if 2 people claimed they would not get the same penalty... at least that is what I gathered from wonk's post. and thus it's not possible to confirm anything.

Say the bomb claims... he could at random lose his suicide attack, lose his passive defensive suicide or not be able to vote. So technically a miller should at random be either not impacted or not able to vote... this would make it a 50% chance of being confirmable, such as every other player.


I really don't like how you used a miller and a bomb as an example :/

bomb is the example that came to mind for a role both active and passive.

Miller is not an example, it's the subject of the discution ^^



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

TruckOSaurus said:
Also, we've got a good first day going on. One of the best in a while, it would be foolish to let it end on a timelimit.

Vote: Time extension


except there's plurality not majority, so for that i'm not willing to extend.



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

theprof00 said:
Warning: this is off-topic from the current discussion.

Did anyone notice anything interesting in regarding to the opening flavor?

I'd prefer to point out my suspicion sometime later on, when it may be more helpful with analyzing, but I don't want to go down with the idea either. Can someone else verify that they're seeing what I'm seeing? It has to do with one of the sentences in the flavor.
I'm pretty sure it's meant to be hidden.. if you know what I'm talking about, please say "I see it".
If nobody sees it, well, I'll probably have to give it away by the end of day.

I reread it and I saw something, don't know if it's the same thing as what you saw. What I noticed would be linked to a possible role in the game and it would make me wary of hatmoza.



Signature goes here!

Around the Network
Hephaestos said:
TruckOSaurus said:
Also, we've got a good first day going on. One of the best in a while, it would be foolish to let it end on a timelimit.

Vote: Time extension


except there's plurality not majority, so for that i'm not willing to extend.

Does this equate to whoever has the most votes when the time expires is lynched?



Signature goes here!

Hephaestos said:
hatmoza said:
Hephaestos said:
Linkzmax said:
Last time I'll discuss my non-penalized issue. Do you guys think if everyone claimed Town/Townie/Pro-town/whatever the PMs say that as the penalty cycled through the list we could confirm 2 or 3 of the 8 or 9 townies by their loss of vote? It's an exploit which doesn't belong in this game or any other.

if 2 people claimed they would not get the same penalty... at least that is what I gathered from wonk's post. and thus it's not possible to confirm anything.

Say the bomb claims... he could at random lose his suicide attack, lose his passive defensive suicide or not be able to vote. So technically a miller should at random be either not impacted or not able to vote... this would make it a 50% chance of being confirmable, such as every other player.


I really don't like how you used a miller and a bomb as an example :/

bomb is the example that came to mind for a role both active and passive.

Miller is not an example, it's the subject of the discution ^^

 

Last time you mentioned bomb as an example in mafia, you were in fact soft claiming bomb. And sure enough you were bomb. At least I think that was you.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

TruckOSaurus said:
Also, we've got a good first day going on. One of the best in a while, it would be foolish to let it end on a timelimit.

Vote: Time extension


the chance for ending the day ended 30 hours ago with 0 votes for it, so the day will end as scheduled in 6 hours



TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
Warning: this is off-topic from the current discussion.

Did anyone notice anything interesting in regarding to the opening flavor?

I'd prefer to point out my suspicion sometime later on, when it may be more helpful with analyzing, but I don't want to go down with the idea either. Can someone else verify that they're seeing what I'm seeing? It has to do with one of the sentences in the flavor.
I'm pretty sure it's meant to be hidden.. if you know what I'm talking about, please say "I see it".
If nobody sees it, well, I'll probably have to give it away by the end of day.

I reread it and I saw something, don't know if it's the same thing as what you saw. What I noticed would be linked to a possible role in the game and it would make me wary of hatmoza.


Do share!



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Just so everyone knows my feeling toward time extensions. Fuck time extensions -_-



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson