1-Nothing to misread. I deducted that Radish and Linkz are Elena and Chloe. StillI could be very wrong. I doubt it, but I could.

2- Lets just say, Nathan got my message loud and clear.

Chloe fits the ability, just like my character fits theirs. And in case you didn't figure it out Einstein, that's the reason I believe you are town. I'm not worried about people assuming I'm budding up with you, results of my/your findings will back up our pro-alignment.

I did research, and I cannot say anything about it or I'll lose my ability. A single word can give it away. Let's just say It was such a forgettable moment in the game for me.

No, that there was not deliberate. That I figured out later.

wow I messed up my addition beforei It should have been 31 hours left before. Since it's just under 29 hours left now.

I changed my mind.

Vote radishhead.

VOTALS!

on players

Hat: prof, nen,

Radish: vett, final-fan

by players

prof: hat

nen: hat

vett: radish

final-fan: radish

with 12 people it would take 7 votes for a majority, with the current spread of votes 7 is what is needed for a lynch before the time limit.

Should I repeat myself? You're literally saying that a nearly unconfirmable role should be easily confirmed by a nearly meaningless penalty at this point in the game.

Because you think I'm Mafia, or because you think I'm a threat to the town?

It's a line of thought you can't argue further because it's simply wrong. While you FoSed hat for it, "This here sounds even worse... it's a name claim (which are authorised) made by a player for an otherone.... so what happends, well the real chloe can say "No" and directly paint a target on him/herself... or this can become a confirmation of linkz that will be only undone by chloe's death at which point Linkz can just say "i never said I was chloe"." very much reads like you're implying hat did it to set a fakeclaim for me. You are further pushing that idea here by saying I didn't narrow it sooner, which wasn't the case either.(And yes I know how you could try to rebute that, but I'm expecting you not to, which isn't to say it's bad not to) Oh how I wish timestamps weren't such absolute crap here. I can only give a post-by-post instead:

hat asked who has a nice ass -> radish claims his character definitely fits -> TOS doesn't mention the topic -> same for nen -> Baal checks in -> nen reply's to question with "Hey, I'm up here"(I haven't yet checked if it's soft-claim or the general 'I'm more than my assests') -> Kantor checks in(speaking of, where's he been?) -> I claim my character has a hot ass.

So of those 5 people, we have two check ins, one yes, one "avoiding", and one that I haven't fully considered yet. Zero denials. As for what qualifies, I looked up Chloe Frazer(no I'm not familiar with the flavor) and it wasn't long before I came across mentions of her ass being hot, sexy, nice, etc.. continuing with the timeline:

you state you don't know about your character's ass -> hat makes his post that radish and I are probably Elena, Chloe, or Nathan(and states he thinks Nathan is being mod roleplayed) -> hat states character has a nice ass -> I say hat is right about me

Again, zero denials and 4 people have yet to even post after the initial question. This is where I narrowed myself into one of two names. I can't say "you're right" and not correct the theory on Nathan or that would be questioned if I tried to fakeclaim him later. As hypothetical scum it'd be absolutley insane to force myself into one of two(or even three if you care to disagree with my last point) nameclaims when hat(and it wouldn't matter what his alignment is) stated only three characters have hot asses and there were two yeses on the table and zero denials.

Semantics. Though it doesn't read literally as such, I meant the scummates implication you were making which is a two-way connection. You did clearly only state it as one direction,(though as I've done in the past, hat makes a good point in the flaws of your logic) though with the connections you've made I feel like you're already painting me as scum and using others as evidence against me.

The fact that you said I'd be a direct lynch if hat flips mafia means you aren't even considering he could be buddying up to me, which means you are again implying I'm scum. There's little harm for scum in pushing for an "easy" mislynch and huge gains if the focus of a day can be on said mislynch.

Finally, it's a statement like the bolded which is why I'm expecting to be lynched, but I don't think it's a certainty either. I know that auto-lynching a miller claim at some point during the game isn't the right move, and I have some faith that there are others that will see that also.