What is it with people trying to twist things so that everything they like gets a better review?  it happened with Dead Space 3, as well. "If you felt it didn't fit your tastes you should have tried a different mode/played co op/changed the difficulty/played it different."  that's no different from here, where people are picking and chosing what to be critical of so that it doesn't get a bad score.  WE already had a review of the game's content seen here: 

http://www.gamrreview.com/review/88819/jak-amp-daxter-collection/

That told you all you neded to know about how well the series held up against modern standards and how well they played.  you already know all that shit, there's no need for me to repeat it, so I discussed mostly the changes and how well it was ported.  I could only compare this to the existing game, because if I was reviewing it on its own merits (value, graphics, gameplay, etc), it'd rate higher, but since it's my job to rate it compared to it's existing version, it got a super duper shitty score, since it was a super duper shitty port.  You'll notice I discussed that very issue in the very first paragraph when I mentioned the changes and additional content in Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D.  

This, however, was identical to the console version, save the shitty performance.  I don't understand why that incites such anger in the community.  

No wonder this thread is jokingly called "The Church of the Vita Cult" by some others.  So slavenly devoted to all things Vita that most people can't see when your chosen path is rocky.  The Jak and Daxter collection on Vita is a perfect example of developers being too lazy to give a shit about porting things to the system properly.  No to mention how absolutely terrible Soul Sacrifice really was once you got past the well written story and cool spell blending/stacking mechanic.  

So not sure what this means but 

First of i haven't read the review nor have i played the game, but this comment just rubs me the wrong way.

What makes you think you are better suited to judge a game than mike (or anybody esle for that matter)? It's not like reviewing games need's some super rare and specialized skillset. He is just as capable to form an opinion about the game as you are and just because he doesn't agree with you, you don't have to go and insult people. 

I find it particularely ironic how you call people in this thread "slavenly devoted to all things Vita that most people can't see when your chosen path is rocky", when it seems like you cant accept criticism (wheter valid or not) and diferent opinions yourself.

and last but not least Souls Sacrifice rocks, it's not without flaws but it rocks.

Also Mugen we need a new poll, this one's getting old.