only had seen a few episodes between 1997 and 2007 when it was on myself. Now I've seen all 214 and the movies.

Atlatis started in 2004 so there was 3 years of overlap and 2 years where it was on it's own.

I had pushed you day one. and was sure you were scum then. Didn't really push to hard for you day two for a few reasons. I was already sure you were scum and wanted to try to hunt for others since I new I was dead I wasn't afraid of doing anything. There wasn't too much enthusiasm when I mentioned you, linkz slightly but that was about it. Plus with the people we had lurking I didn't want the game to get that boring so fast.

Don't take too much credit for trash's lynch there were several who pushed for that and even then it never really had too many votes and could have flipped to someone else just before the end.

yeah I didn't mean to take credit at all for that.

But I want to mention. How long would everyone have put me off for later? Because that was my goal, and lynching the lurker, despite everyone previously saying that it should be a last resort, happened before me. I wanted to tread that line, and I felt that I did.

Had we both lived I would have tried to have you lynched the next day. No idea on how long anyone else would wate.

Yes, I understand, "the next day", but with suspicions on day 1, and no push on either day 1 or 2, do you really believe your conviction? IIRC stefl and ToS were next on the chopping block to the majority. It is the reason I called the game for town, because they were going to be lynched.

Additionally, a lot of my views and arguments were then carried over throughout the game, which lends credibility to my innocence. Baal was interrogated on day 3 over huge contradictions, which I was one of the first to put real pressure toward, Wonk, you were again brought into the spotlight over possibly being scum, etc, etc.

I do believe them. I just learned things playing with you guys. Revenge voting gets looked down apon even when there are clear arguments, so day one I pushed you with arguments and not my vote.

Day 2 was a big game changer for me. I was going to die besides a slim possibility of a poison doc. I figured trying to get as much info out of as many people as possible was going to work more in my favore than trying to take you down. That and I wasn't even sure at that point if I wanted to help the town or the scum team.

IIRC I managed to push you away from your suspicions by suggesting that you were being used, and that the poison was used purposely to make you continue after your suspects with more intensity.

Also, one of the things you went after me for was:

"5. My issue isn't about the town lynching day 1. It's about your defence of linkz. I'll have to go back and look at it further though."

I was able to tell the Linkz had cleared ABC through the night and was therefore town. So, I defended him, (but not about the lynching thing). 

Remember you said that Linkz was so sure that there would only be one kill. All I said was that it "just so happened to have only been one kill". It was just fyi, but you latched onto it as me defending him. 

Again, it wasn't MY misinterpretation as opposed to BOTH of us (at the least). All I was doing was saying that linkz was accidentally right. And it turned into a ridiculous argument where we were arguing two different things and somehow not figuring out that out....that is, until I did.

I think one of the hardest parts about mafia is predicting how a paranoid townie is going to act. :P

See, the way I understand it, don't argue with Wonk is a clear lesson. From now on, I'm not going to do it as town or mafia or anything. Day one, you had nothing on me. It was when you said, "i'm afraid of being killed.....Power role games are scary" or something along those lines, and I caught you in a lie or contradiction later on.

And then look at that, I caught a scum.

No, my lesson is don't talk to you. You get so stubborn, and like now, you think that it was your suspicions that had you pushing for me! I initiated it! Had I not pursued you, you would not have had these suspicions, and my pursuance was against a scum. Surely, you see the irony in that.

It's like this post:

All I have to do is not say anything against you, and you'll defend me.

Here's the next post:

Before this post, you defended me. But I was right. I caught you. 

This embedded quote is also ironic.

and because if more people have strong roles "I might just get taken out again  victim of an improper balance to the force :P"

yet you now argue the game was balanced.

I told you. My lesson, my lesson from now on, is don't argue with wonk. I've learned the same thing about Trash, and FF. You just don't argue with them and they'll leave you alone. It doesn't matter if I'm right. Don't argue.