Rpruett said:
Kasz216 said:
Rpruett said:
Kasz216 said:
Rpruett said:
It's a way to hack any PS3. He gave anyone the instructions on hacking any PS3. Obviously, I'm not concerned with him cracking 'my personal PS3' but he gave everyone the ability to hack any bank account (PS3). Not saying I could personally hack YOUR PS3 from a distance, but if I had the opportunity to have access to your PS3, I certainly could using his method.
Obviously, this is going to cause problems with the bank. Especially because these bank account hacks cause other people to lose their money, reliability and safety of their bank account.
|
I don't see your point where this is an issue? Since the only people who can hack their PS3's are still, the people who own their PS3s. Or people who break into someone elses house.
In which case, they could just steal your PS3 rather then hack it.
I think this website would be enlightening to you.
http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/neutronics/todd/nuc.bomb.html
It is... quite literally, a blueprint to build a nueclear weapon.
Anyone could build their own atomic bomb, or modify anyone elses I suppose.
|
How many Nukes have you built with that guide, since it is the tell all blueprint to crafting them?
The point is, to build your own nuclear weapon you need a lot of resources at your disposal. There is a reason not every country in the world has Nukes at their disposal. Despite how easy you would think it is. Instructions alone is probably the easiest part of the process.
The point where it's an issue is you have someone who has claimed not to do anything illegal while cracking the PS3 (Piracy, etc) , while simultaneously and obviously released codes to the rest of the internet (For his obvious intent) (to financially harm Sony via Piracy). You're absolutely bat shit crazy if you don't think Sony (Or the Bank we've been referring to) is going to come after him legally and attempt anything they can find to bust him for something illegal.
Everyone seems to assume he is innocent because all he did is release the codes (If that's all he did, I have no doubt that he will win this case against Sony). However, I also believe that he took it further (I'm a realist). I completely believe that there were definitely piracy motives (Especially after releasing the codes) to his decision making and it wasn't just all earnest and honest 'jailbreaking'.
This is why and what Sony is going to attack him for. People are missing the point if releasing the codes are illegal or not. Sony is coming after him knowing the liklihood that there was a legitimate crime committed that he could be proven guilty on.
|
As for his "ulterior motives". This is the same guy who jailbroke the Iphone. There were no ulterior piracy motives there.
|
That's odd. That must be why Apple went to court trying to stop Jailbreaking from getting a DMCA Exception, right? They just felt it was to their benefit and that there was no piracy to be found right?
Again, you want me to believe this fairy tale unrealistic viewpoint. Sure Geohot didn't release an official custom firmware that 'allows' piracy. He would then catagorically be proven guilty in this situation. That's essentially walking to the police station and admitting a crime. That's retarded. He knows full well that piracy is entailed with what he is doing (And in my opinion he atleast explored this to find out how it could be done).
Ofcourse piracy of games is one of the reasons to Jailbreak a system of this nature, or cheating in games, etc. It's one of the negative side effects but it is definitely one of the known, desired outcomes.
|
And yet.. he wasn't convicted eh? Whether piracy or not is around is completely pointless.
Also. Not he wouldn't be catagorically found guilty.
It's actually not illegal to make something play Isos. Or whatever PS3 games are played in.
Piracy being one of the outcomes is... completely irrelevent.
The only time something providing or making something that has illegal uses is relevent is when there are zero legal applications.
Afterall, kitchen knives have the illegal use of stabbing no?
Stabbing someone with a kitchen knife is one of the known negative effects that some people desire... right?
For further refrence, See Sony vs Bleem. A case Sony actually lost. When Bleem was providing... you guessed it, software that allowed you to play your PS1 games on PC or also if you wanted. ISOs.
Sony and Apple both sued Geohotz for the same reason. Intimidation. An attempt to intimidate people from doing something completely legal by threatening them with expesnive lawusits. (Just like Sony did with Bleem! Which is partially why you don't see other commercial emulators, despite them being ruled legal.)
Sony literally does this all the time. LOTS of companies do.