By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

@Vetteman: Any chance you watched Gnizmo last night?



Signature goes here!

Around the Network

Okay,  Another sith is dead

Any new Info vett?



-

Okay, so as it turns out radish had an apprentice of sorts? I honestly did not expect this turn of events, Gniz gave off a pro-town vibe to me, so I am genuinely shocked to discover that he was scum. Me and Zex are likely to have similar, if not exactly the same suspects.

 

How many left and how many is it to lynch? Some of the names on the front page don't seem to be crossed out :S



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

Vetteman94 said:
zexen_lowe said:

Another day, another killed color. I wonder what the heck happened this night. Still, only one mafia remaining and I'm torn between two candidates on who that last one might be


Mind sharing who those 2 are?

I'd rather see every player's reaction to the night first before casting my suspicions. Still, it's not like I'm Sherlock Holmes, my suspects should be quite obvious




oops i'll update the front page sorry



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Around the Network

Well I guess I'll launch the discussion by naming who main suspects: NotStan and MetalGear.

I'll start with MetalGear since it doesn't require much post linking: my main concern with him is the lurking or active lurking if you prefer. I understand he had retricted online access at the beginning of the game but his contribution to the discussion is minimal, most of his posts are either explaining his situation or asking what's going on. He didn't push strongly for any lynches, mostly got on a the bandwagon, he could easily be scum trying to lay lown.

About NotStan now. He suffers from the same lack of active participation as MG when it comes to pushing for lynches and bandwagoning and since the beginning of the game he's been making posts that have been bothering me.

- Twilight regret, trying to push away his responsability for the lynch of Baal.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3991967

- Start of day comments:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3993554 - The part could almost read like "Interesting our kill didn't go through"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3996906 - The wording is quite interesting here.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3999484 - Comments on Gnizmo's pro-town vibe maybe that's because he thought his friend was doing a good job at blending in.

- Then there's the "role doesn't match with alignment" posts, which we forgot about yesterday while we were busy with dsister. I believe NotStan was stressed about having the nameclaim down the line so he thought he'd drop this line so he could use his own name in that situation. This would prevent him from having to pick one out and risk having that name already in use.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3994227
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3994721



Signature goes here!

Wow, day one and I had them in a single post. Gnizmo must of facpalmed really hard when Linkz quoted this.

Linkzmax said:
hatmoza said:

I want Gnizmo and Linkz take on everything that's happened so far.

Rather than jump to conclusions, why did you choose the two of us to get opinions from?

Gnizmo was my top suspect today. And since you guys never give me credit for my insight, I'll give myself a pat on the back thank you very much ... ... MVP from heph would be cool too.

hatmoza said:
hatmoza said:

Vote Dsister

A redirector's action would show on both targets. 

Why would you block someone who didn't have a night action? Your claim does not make sense to me.


Here, let me answer my question since you folded your cards and gave up. I would too in your shoes with so much evidence pointing to you being scum.

I don't necessarily agree with the redirector role, as a matter of fact, I'm going to look into the person who first brought it up if I live through tomorrow as I think that was nothing but a way to throw confusion into the mix.

What I do believe is that you targeted prof because you killed him. Plain and simple.

 

As much as I agree with Trucks on Stan and MG, I'm not ready to trust him, or Zexen for that matter. I believe/agree there is only one scum left. Seeing how they were two SKs. But I don't have a reason to trust neither of yet. 

Let's hear from MG and Stan.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

TruckOSaurus said:

@Vetteman: Any chance you watched Gnizmo last night?


No I didnt



Each to their speculations Trucks, but I don't think you had much participation either.

In regards to the regret of lynching Baal - yes of course I regret lynching the pro town roleblocker, after all all he had to do was nameclaim and I would have dropped my vote, as probably a few other people. Pro town roleblocker is a very important asset, if a person doesn't regret voting for him even after finding out that he was pro town then there is something to suspect - say your hammer vote on him for example, a minute before hat could unvote.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3991923

No, I said interesting night in a sense of "Strange that on the first night only one person got killed in a game likely to be flooded with powerroles".

Now I don't have very much time to respond to the rest of these "accusations" since I have to leave but I have to say this:

I am Anakin Skywalker and  I am a vanilla townie, I hold no power and lynching me would just waste a lynch and will cause another death overnight seeing as there is a scum floating around. If you do wish to lynch me, don't hammer me till 12 tonight, as I do have some pretty interesting information that may help to deduce who the scum is.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

hatmoza said:

Wow, day one and I had them in a single post. Gnizmo must of facpalmed really hard when Linkz quoted this.

Linkzmax said:
hatmoza said:

I want Gnizmo and Linkz take on everything that's happened so far.

Rather than jump to conclusions, why did you choose the two of us to get opinions from?

Gnizmo was my top suspect today. And since you guys never give me credit for my insight, I'll give myself a pat on the back thank you very much ... ... MVP from heph would be cool too.

hatmoza said:
hatmoza said:

Vote Dsister

A redirector's action would show on both targets. 

Why would you block someone who didn't have a night action? Your claim does not make sense to me.


Here, let me answer my question since you folded your cards and gave up. I would too in your shoes with so much evidence pointing to you being scum.

I don't necessarily agree with the redirector role, as a matter of fact, I'm going to look into the person who first brought it up if I live through tomorrow as I think that was nothing but a way to throw confusion into the mix.

What I do believe is that you targeted prof because you killed him. Plain and simple.

 

As much as I agree with Trucks on Stan and MG, I'm not ready to trust him, or Zexen for that matter. I believe/agree there is only one scum left. Seeing how they were two SKs. But I don't have a reason to trust neither of yet. 

Let's hear from MG and Stan.

I'm glad you don't trust me because frankly I don't trust you 100% either, zexen even less.



Signature goes here!