By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Gnizmo said:

Here is an idea. What if Dsis can change a persons target? He jacks Radish for a known kill and puts him on prof. The bus driver and body snatcher bit just don't add up sadly.

There is actually a role that does this, it's called a redirector

http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Redirector



-

Around the Network

Also it can be both pro-town and anti-town.



-

zexen_lowe said:
Vetteman94 said:
Gnizmo said:

Here is an idea. What if Dsis can change a persons target? He jacks Radish for a known kill and puts him on prof. The bus driver and body snatcher bit just don't add up sadly.


I had an ability like that as a Mafia once.


Do you remember what your role was called? We could search it in mafiascum to see if it's a common role

Metal Gear found it,  its called a redirecter,  interestingly enough I was also Mafia Godfather that game with that role



Hmm...doesn't help much if we can't know whether it's a pro-town or anti-town role. I guess we should wait for dsis, though if he's antitown the only thing he needs to do is agree with everything we said and claim pro-town-ness -_-




dsister said:

"Judged" sounds like something Qui-gon and jedis would do.

 And it's much more likely that the confirmed innocent was killed by scum. As I can't see Qui-gon assassinating people...


@Zexen
The above is pretty damning. The role is confirmed and it is the only logical explanation. There is no good reason to redirect a kill onto a confirmed townie with a handy role. Genuinely I can't think of anything he can say that would change my mind. It is as good as a confession. Dsister believes the kill must have been done by scum, and it was done by him!

Vote: Dsister



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

Around the Network
Gnizmo said:
dsister said:

"Judged" sounds like something Qui-gon and jedis would do.

 And it's much more likely that the confirmed innocent was killed by scum. As I can't see Qui-gon assassinating people...


@Zexen
The above is pretty damning. The role is confirmed and it is the only logical explanation. There is no good reason to redirect a kill onto a confirmed townie with a handy role. Genuinely I can't think of anything he can say that would change my mind. It is as good as a confession. Dsister believes the kill must have been done by scum, and it was done by him!

Vote: Dsister

I don't quite see what you see there, although I am suspicious of Dsis right now too, we shouldn't vote too rashly yet, especially with such low numbers and with what is probably almost no power roles left, what's interesting is the fact that Dsis visited prof too.. People say that he might be the redirector, can he also be the person who unwittingly deflects a night action done onot him onto someone else? I think such role exists as I remember reading about it. Dsis has alot of explaining to do.

HoS Dsister

Holding off the vote for now.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

I think I found the role that I was talking about in the post above, I am not going to mention it yet and wait for Dsis's explanations for his presence at the murder scene. 

 



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

So we go from one SK kill on Night 1 to 4 deaths on Night 2. I am confused. Although some people don't like that, I'm going to look for clues in the flavor.



Signature goes here!

A clue perhaps? In flavour it says that Prof has a letter "m" around his neck and Hutt was killed with a letter M carved into his back, coincidence? If joined together could it be the reference to the masons, and on top of that if a mason has a killing ability would it be possible for him/her to be anti town with such an ability, ie SK, although as I understand it, SK is a separate third party so unlikely to be part of a mason group. Prof didn't have the killing abilitiy, he had a double vote so it's unlikely that he is responsible for Hutt's death, so that leaves possibility of a vigilante.

Theory that I proposed earlier in regards to the "crushed" death seems the most plausible to me right now, unless someone offes a better theory, either that or we're stuck with god knows how many serial killers.

Rambling here.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

A quick search yielded me this result;

"Jabba the Hutt does show rare moments of charity, however. For instance, in one Expanded Universe story, he prevents a Chevin named Ephant Mon from freezing to death on an ice planet by covering him with his bloated layers of fat; the two are eventually rescued, and Ephant Mon becomes totally loyal to the crime lord, making him the only resident of Jabba's palace that the crime lord trusts."

Edited in, because the post went haywire: So could it be that R2D2 was crushed by the fat?



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.