Yeah... Sorry I am really not buying this now. You are obviously crumpling under pressure here. There is no good reason to ever act scummy. I really can't think of a single good reason for it. This kind of seals it for me.

Vote: Baalzamon

Honestly, I had what I believed to be a well thought out, clever response about hatmoza, but I'm not even going to say it.  Every post I make, people read it with the thought that I am scum, and they dig into it and find the tiniest little indication that could potentially mean that I am scum, and it just isn't even worth it anymore.

I've actually almost gotten to the point where if I get voted out, I might just laugh my ass off that you all were so ignorant that no matter what I said, you would just ignore it, leading to death of a town asset.

With an odd number of players, not lynching one day would yield us the same number of days as would lynching, extra kills (SK, vig) and doc protections notwhitsanding. So, in this case, a no lynch doesn't help us. Hence why everyone who's voting no lynch should reconsider their vote

This is the same thing I said to Baalz, but while there I acknowledged the possibility of a grammar mistake, here there's a problem because there can't be any mistake. How can you "have an underlying feeling" that he's not the enemy? You're not supposed to know anyone's alignment (again, unless you're mason), you may feel that the argument against Baalz is weak, but that doesn't make him automatically town, you're jumping to a conclusion and, if you're town, defending someone you shouldn't.

As I said, No Lynch doesn't help us at all, and I think you're trying to make people pull out of his track

Vote: radishhead

My post was supposed to come after wonk's...I was agreeing with him in the odd/even number of players, but it seems I took a good time to write it

I've been pretty busy today, the fastest I can get on tommorow would be 3pm eastern. I do think Bazaalmon is acting pretty strangely, he might just be trying a different play style but I don't buy the "Acting scummy to be town thing".

Somebody asked me what I define as "extreme."  Being that I can't see my being voted out as doing anything except hurting the town, this would classify as one of those moments.

The only chance I stand of not being voted out is if the other suspect, radish, is voted out, so radish it will be.

Unvote

Vote: Radish

Prof told me to act scummier.  I saw prof as a "veteran" so to speak being.  Being that it was my first game I've ever played, I assumed a "veteran" would know what he was talking about, and if he says I need to act a little scummier as a town, then I need to act a little scummier as a town.  If you were playing your first game ever, and a "veteran" gave you advice, would you not attempt to put that advice into play in your next game?

Prof, I rather despise you for telling me this advice, as it has rather ruined any and all fun I've yet to have in this round.

Did he specifically say "scummier"?

I should put my vote where my preferences lie

Gorky: radishhead

FoS baal

Don't know what he specifically said, but I know that is what I interpreted it to mean, and I've learned my lesson.