Gotta go take a test Will be back later.

first of all, radish, a townie should never go out of their way to look town. The more town a player looks, the more likely they are to die. So yes, acting "scummy" is beneficial to townies, specifically power roles.

However, that is not what Baal did. He was not trying to act scummy, he is being scummy and saying it was an act.

I'm convinced enough to throw my vote on this.

ungork

vote: Baalzamon

Also, just to point something out that I have seen mentioned yet, Baal wrote in a post to (Radish?),

"why on earth would you bring up flavor when all it led to was [my own suspicion]".

Is that a mafia complaining about his teammate?

FoS Wonk

For leading the town in what is clearly the wrong direction. These suspicions make no sense - I merely wanted people to stop discussing the flavour BECAUSE Heph had pointed out that it wasn't worth doing. Why would we want to keep discussing the flavour after Heph had told us that it's pointless? And why are you trying to get us talking about it again?

It wasn't to me, but I'll check who it was in a sec

Edit: It was being aimed at Wonk

now you seem to be getting rather defensive.

Funny part is had you just said you hadn't read hephs post it would have been very plausible since it was the post right before yours and it hadn't been that long. Instead you defended you post by saying the discussion continued.

You never explained why wanting the flavour discussion to end was suspicious. I clearly said "we shouldn't have looked too far into the flavour", which I assume is the post that is causing the fuss. This post wasn't meant to mean much - it was just me being smug for feeling that the Gork thing was leading nowhere, and it got confirmed by Heph. The post was going to begin "as I suspected", but I didn't think that it would be well recieved x) Why did you want discussion of the flavour to continue?

1. So you know going after baal or trucks is the fith direction? While wondering about you zex and dsis is clrearly wrong?

2. Then why did you say the discussion continued intead of just saying this before?

3. And why would 3 people need to ask us to stop once it was clarified?

4. This is a very different subject.

There were 6 posts in between Heph's and my post

Three of them were mentioning it...

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3989925

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3989931

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3989946

1. I don't know which direction is correct, except that this one is wrong (because I know my alignment, and the argument makes no sense)

2. I did both - I mentioned that it was leading nowhere, and then afterwards mentioned that we shouldn't have done it.

3. How should I know? I can't control what other people post.

4. No it's not - it's the reason for the FoS