By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
hatmoza said:
TruckOSaurus said:

Did you just confirm hatmoza as town?

I promised myself that I was going to vote the first player who mentioned heph's unintentional confirmation of my role. As unfair and cheap it was for me to exploit the situation like I did, I still believe the only people who point this out or be concerned with this confirmation are scum.

Vote: Trucks

What would I gain from pointing it out if I were scum? It wouldn't be new information to me.

People were suspicious of your claim, I also had my doubts about it, I saw this as a reason to stop worrying about it.



Signature goes here!

Around the Network
hatmoza said:

If I didn't know any better (and it seems I say that every game now) I'd say trucks was trying to indirectly push for a first day lynch with his little gork stunt back there.

" looky looky, the flavor text says if we don't lynch, the evil gork will get one of us."


have you noticed that this was my original question about gorking?

I said that I thought the SK was gorky, and we sated him by lynching, but if we didn't he can kill someone randomly.

This is basically the same right?



TruckOSaurus said:
hatmoza said:
TruckOSaurus said:

Did you just confirm hatmoza as town?

I promised myself that I was going to vote the first player who mentioned heph's unintentional confirmation of my role. As unfair and cheap it was for me to exploit the situation like I did, I still believe the only people who point this out or be concerned with this confirmation are scum.

Vote: Trucks

What would I gain from pointing it out if I were scum? It wouldn't be new information to me.

People were suspicious of your claim, I also had my doubts about it, I saw this as a reason to stop worrying about it.

rather than something to gain, it could be seen as scum criticizing the host for giving an advantage to the town (even though I didn't see it as confirming, myself).



theprof00 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
hatmoza said:
TruckOSaurus said:

Did you just confirm hatmoza as town?

I promised myself that I was going to vote the first player who mentioned heph's unintentional confirmation of my role. As unfair and cheap it was for me to exploit the situation like I did, I still believe the only people who point this out or be concerned with this confirmation are scum.

Vote: Trucks

What would I gain from pointing it out if I were scum? It wouldn't be new information to me.

People were suspicious of your claim, I also had my doubts about it, I saw this as a reason to stop worrying about it.

rather than something to gain, it could be seen as scum criticizing the host for giving an advantage to the town (even though I didn't see it as confirming, myself).

exactly! And that's what I was implying in my post. Poorly worded of course. Matter of fact, all my posts seem  to be plagued with typos and scattered thoughts. I"ve been up for almost 40 hours.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Could we drop the "gork", please? It's just getting in the way atm, if it becomes a problem we can address it later...



Sig thanks to Saber! :D 

Around the Network
dsister said:

Could we drop the "gork", please? It's just getting in the way atm, if it becomes a problem we can address it later...

What do you want to discuss then?



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

theprof00 said:
hatmoza said:

If I didn't know any better (and it seems I say that every game now) I'd say trucks was trying to indirectly push for a first day lynch with his little gork stunt back there.

" looky looky, the flavor text says if we don't lynch, the evil gork will get one of us."


have you noticed that this was my original question about gorking?

I said that I thought the SK was gorky, and we sated him by lynching, but if we didn't he can kill someone randomly.

This is basically the same right?

 I believe we were quick to dismiss it. But that wasn't as shady as Balz and trucks discussion. We already hurdled that bump. But as soon as we turned our backs, TOS and Balz went right back into it ... wait , wasn't balz the one to initially point out the clarification of Gork was nothing but flavor  in the first place? Why would he go back an' open a can of worms onthe subject again?



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Baalzamon said:
dsister said:

Could we drop the "gork", please? It's just getting in the way atm, if it becomes a problem we can address it later...

What do you want to discuss then?


Something that won't clutter the thread with pointless worry/pondering 



Sig thanks to Saber! :D 

Baalzamon said:
dsister said:

Could we drop the "gork", please? It's just getting in the way atm, if it becomes a problem we can address it later...

What do you want to discuss then?

Heph already confirmed that the Gork in the flavour meant nothing - there's no point in talking about it. I agree that it's getting in the way - especially considering that we've got quite a tight time limit for the day.



Click this button, you know you want to!  [Subscribe]

Watch me on YouTube!

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRadishBros

~~~~ Mario Kart 8 drove far past my expectations! Never again will I doubt the wheels of a Monster Franchise! :0 ~~~~

hatmoza said:
theprof00 said:
hatmoza said:

If I didn't know any better (and it seems I say that every game now) I'd say trucks was trying to indirectly push for a first day lynch with his little gork stunt back there.

" looky looky, the flavor text says if we don't lynch, the evil gork will get one of us."


have you noticed that this was my original question about gorking?

I said that I thought the SK was gorky, and we sated him by lynching, but if we didn't he can kill someone randomly.

This is basically the same right?

 I believe we were quick to dismiss it. But that wasn't as shady as Balz and trucks discussion. We already hurdled that bump. But as soon as we turned our backs, TOS and Balz went right back into it ... wait , wasn't balz the one to initially point out the clarification of Gork was nothing but flavor  in the first place? Why would he go back an' open a can of worms onthe subject again?

I still found it to be interesting discussion that could lead to something, but it seems it has fallen apart and doesn't have any importance, so it was all a waste of my thinking.



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.