Oil mostly, but also change leaders. We put Gaddafi in power, now he refused to obey us, do we are changing leaders to a new puppet.
Oil mostly, but also change leaders. We put Gaddafi in power, now he refused to obey us, do we are changing leaders to a new puppet.


| ssj12 said: Oil mostly, but also change leaders. We put Gaddafi in power, now he refused to obey us, do we are changing leaders to a new puppet. |
The US didn't put Gaddafi in power and he was never a US puppet.

Rath said:
|
opps, your right. He defeated our puppet and took over. And created one of the wealthiest nations in Africa. So actually, he pissed the US off by taking over a nation we controlled. So actually, he isn't evil at all.
http://moraloutrage.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/muammar-gaddafi-of-libya/


damn DDoS attack. piss off Redditers!!!!!


| Games4Fun said: Why in the world are we "USA" in libya? From what I understood congress was not even included on the decision making on this too. When did NATO members become the only people to ask about going to war? |
Because Barak Obama has the same flaw that Bush did. Idealism over pragmatism combined with a love of Democracy.

Mr Khan said:
Actually the lefties around here seem at least neutral on the issue, or in support of it (ManusJustus and I both do, and we're two of the more acerbic leftwingers around here) On these boards, the libertarians seem to be the ones in opposition |
It's not just the boards.
The amazing flip flop of so many people has amused me greatly.
In general, outside a few people with nuanced stances it's made it a lot easier for me to tell who to respect and who not to when it comes to political opinion.

ssj12 said:
http://moraloutrage.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/muammar-gaddafi-of-libya/ |
I posted a reply to this, don't know where it went.
Essentially, high HDI doesn't change the fact that Gaddafi is a brutal evil tyrant. That's not what the HDI measures. Better measures for how much of a brutal dictator he is are things measuring human rights, press freedoms and political freedoms.
http://www.hrw.org/en/world-report-2011
http://www.freedomhouse.org/images/File/fiw/Tables, Graphs, etc, FIW 2011_Revised 1_11_11.pdf
http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=560&year=2010
Also the UN Human Rights Council is sadly an intensely political organisation and is dominated by countries with poor human rights records, they really (and sadly) can't be taken seriously.
Edit: @Kasz. All of the three major military interventions this century by America have been very different. Opposing some while supporting others is not necessarily hypocritical.

scottie said:
|
The usage of American Military period has to be reported to Congress within 48 hours of a conflict. The president has to explain why. It's not about declaring war, it is about preventing callous use of tax payers money and the endangering of Americans against the will of Americans.
It's one of those things that prevent the president from becoming the despot he's raising arms against. Illegally.
I'm Unamerica and you can too.
The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread:
dib8rman said:
Most of them aren't his own people, they are for the greater part illegal immigrants - some of whom moved to Libya from Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia only to fight US troops in Iraq. Just a detail. |
What? Doesn't make sense no matter which way I go about it.