By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - EA: NPD is 'misrepresentation of our industry'

So according to EA the NPD group is misleading and Irrelevant. Find out why below!

US' monthly sales tracker is 'misleading and potentially irrelevant' says CNN Money report

Major US publishers are on the verge of revolt against NPD, according to a CNN report.

The likes of EA and Activision see the group's monthly retail sales bulletins as 'misleading and potentially irrelevant'.

That's because the reports don't factor in Xbox Live, PSN or iTunes data,.

"Using NPD data for video game sales is like measuring music sales and ignoring something called iTunes," the report quotes EA corporate communications executive Tiffany Steckler as saying.

"We see NPD's data as a misrepresentation of the entire industry."

Last week, NPD's report said that retail sales fell eight per cent in the US.

In the meantime, publishers continue to grow into digital content streams to supplement and sometimes expand further than sales of boxed games.

Activision has seen huge success through Call of Duty map packs - while EA itself is forecasting that it will make $750m in digital sales revenues for the year ending March 31st, a rise of 39 per cent.

Plus, rising stars like Zynga, generates its revenues purely from online transactions within Facebook. It's been valued as over $8bn previously.

But NPD has tried to calm the grumbles, saying the report blows 'out of proportion' the situation.

Divisive analyst Michael Pachter of Wedbush Morgan also defends NPD, calling it a "gross overstatement" to write its reports off: "EA saying physical game sales don't matter is like Best Buy saying television sales don't matter."

 

 

I agree with EA I heard somewhere



Around the Network

Does this give more credence to VG Chartz #'s?



kidcudi said:

Does this give more credence to VG Chartz #'s?

Not really since VGChartz doesnt track digital sales either, at least not to my  knowledge they dont.  The only reason I believe it does is because VGChartz offers numbers for all regions and not just the US.  Which is only a portion of game sales



Vetteman94 said:
kidcudi said:

Does this give more credence to VG Chartz #'s?

Not really since VGChartz doesnt track digital sales either, at least not to my  knowledge they dont.  The only reason I believe it does is because VGChartz offers numbers for all regions and not just the US.  Which is only a portion of game sales

Well i know GT5 prolgue would be at 5.2 million if it had digital tracking so i'm gonna have to say no



so my guess is that EA or Activison pay NPD for there data. 

But SONY, MS or Apple aren't going to give NPD that data then have NPD charge them for it. 



Of Course That's Just My Opinion, I Could Be Wrong