By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Killzone 3′s Trump Card..Multiplayer

Jay520 on 24 February 2011
Jay520 said:
BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:

Reviews and actual players back me up though.  While there will always be minoritys that enjoy certain games over others, I don't see how you can even compare KZ3's level of multiplayer to Halo.  I mean their in totally seperate realms of depth and sheer content and playability.  And I've played alot of both.  KZ3 has only 3 modes, and very limited upgradable classes.  Its fun and amazing, but miles behind still when in comparison to Halo. 

There's a reason that all pro gamers in MLG and stuff strive to be good at Halo, its the true proving ground in terms of multiplayer on consoles.

Oh i see what you did there, ok... and i don't see how anyone can compare any kind of multiplayer to counter-strike as that is basically the ultimate proving ground of all multiplayer of all time especially to its Gun Game which is miles ahead and more fun than anything on consoles and a community that will never die and multiple tournaments a year back me up with that.

Back to the thread. Killzone 3 is fucking awesome.


And your right and I would never argue that. Counter strike is the premier proving ground for shooters, but that doesn't apply to consoles last I checked.  I never made the Halo camparison the article in the OP did and I just responded.  And killzone 3 fucking rules your right.  The campaign and multiplayer have both blown me away.

What's your point?


i guess my point was was it really necassary to bring halo reach into this thread and say killzones MP is mediocre compared to halos?

The OP made the direct comparison and said that KZ3 has better multiplayer than Halo Reach. 


Um, it said that KZ3 had better graphics and than Reach. It never said KZ3 had better multiplayer than Reach

what the hell is this



Around the Network
BenVTrigger on 24 February 2011
Jay520 said:
BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:

Reviews and actual players back me up though.  While there will always be minoritys that enjoy certain games over others, I don't see how you can even compare KZ3's level of multiplayer to Halo.  I mean their in totally seperate realms of depth and sheer content and playability.  And I've played alot of both.  KZ3 has only 3 modes, and very limited upgradable classes.  Its fun and amazing, but miles behind still when in comparison to Halo. 

There's a reason that all pro gamers in MLG and stuff strive to be good at Halo, its the true proving ground in terms of multiplayer on consoles.

Oh i see what you did there, ok... and i don't see how anyone can compare any kind of multiplayer to counter-strike as that is basically the ultimate proving ground of all multiplayer of all time especially to its Gun Game which is miles ahead and more fun than anything on consoles and a community that will never die and multiple tournaments a year back me up with that.

Back to the thread. Killzone 3 is fucking awesome.


And your right and I would never argue that. Counter strike is the premier proving ground for shooters, but that doesn't apply to consoles last I checked.  I never made the Halo camparison the article in the OP did and I just responded.  And killzone 3 fucking rules your right.  The campaign and multiplayer have both blown me away.

What's your point?


i guess my point was was it really necassary to bring halo reach into this thread and say killzones MP is mediocre compared to halos?

The OP made the direct comparison and said that KZ3 has better multiplayer than Halo Reach. 


Um, it said that KZ3 had better graphics and than Reach. It never said KZ3 is better than Reach

Quotes like this don't imply that KZ3 has better multiplayer?

"Killzone 3 has something to offer you. And while it doesn't quite get to the number of options that a Call of Duty: Black Ops or Halo Reach has, it certainly makes up for having less by making less more"

"Both games pale in comparison to the amount of action that Killzone 3 is pushing on any given moment.  Aside from the frantic gunfights, explosions, and chaos that is ensuing on the battlefield, the environments of Killzone 3's multiplayer map selection are quite amazing."

Listen I'm not hating on KZ3.  I adore the game and so far its easily my GOTY, and I've played more of both games than probably 95% of the users on this site.  I never meant to turn this into Halo vs Killzone thread I was just responding to the comments the OP made comparing them.  He seems to apparently lead toward Killzone being better and mentioned it competing with Halo.  I think Halo, at least multiplayer, is better and just gave a counter argument.  Sorry for stirring up so much in the thread that was not my intention.



Jay520 on 24 February 2011
BenVTrigger said:
Jay520 said:
BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:

Reviews and actual players back me up though.  While there will always be minoritys that enjoy certain games over others, I don't see how you can even compare KZ3's level of multiplayer to Halo.  I mean their in totally seperate realms of depth and sheer content and playability.  And I've played alot of both.  KZ3 has only 3 modes, and very limited upgradable classes.  Its fun and amazing, but miles behind still when in comparison to Halo. 

There's a reason that all pro gamers in MLG and stuff strive to be good at Halo, its the true proving ground in terms of multiplayer on consoles.

Oh i see what you did there, ok... and i don't see how anyone can compare any kind of multiplayer to counter-strike as that is basically the ultimate proving ground of all multiplayer of all time especially to its Gun Game which is miles ahead and more fun than anything on consoles and a community that will never die and multiple tournaments a year back me up with that.

Back to the thread. Killzone 3 is fucking awesome.


And your right and I would never argue that. Counter strike is the premier proving ground for shooters, but that doesn't apply to consoles last I checked.  I never made the Halo camparison the article in the OP did and I just responded.  And killzone 3 fucking rules your right.  The campaign and multiplayer have both blown me away.

What's your point?


i guess my point was was it really necassary to bring halo reach into this thread and say killzones MP is mediocre compared to halos?

The OP made the direct comparison and said that KZ3 has better multiplayer than Halo Reach. 


Um, it said that KZ3 had better graphics and than Reach. It never said KZ3 is better than Reach

Quotes like this don't imply that KZ3 has better multiplayer?

"Killzone 3 has something to offer you. And while it doesn't quite get to the number of options that a Call of Duty: Black Ops or Halo Reach has, it certainly makes up for having less by making less more"

"Both games pale in comparison to the amount of action that Killzone 3 is pushing on any given moment.  Aside from the frantic gunfights, explosions, and chaos that is ensuing on the battlefield, the environments of Killzone 3's multiplayer map selection are quite amazing."

Listen I'm not hating on KZ3.  I adore the game and so far its easily my GOTY, and I've played more of both games than probably 95% of the users on this site.  I never meant to turn this into Halo vs Killzone thread I was just responding to the comments the OP made comparing them.  He seems to apparently lead toward Killzone being better and mentioned it competing with Halo.  I think Halo, at least multiplayer, is better and just gave a counter argument.  Sorry for stirring up so much in the thread that was not my intention.

It's all good. I was just bringing something up. I agree that he did imply that he enjoyed KZ3 as much as Halo, but he never said KZ3 was better than Reach. Or at least, I don't feel as though he did.