By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Invisible PS3 SSFIV costumes explained

In the PlayStation 3 version of stupendous fighting game Super Street Fighter IV you can't see downloaded alternate costumes worn by your opponent if you haven't downloaded them yourself. In the Xbox 360 version you can. Why?

According to Capcom, it's down to Sony, which doesn't cover the cost of making additional data available to users. Microsoft, on the other hand, does.

"The DLC for the newest costumes is additional data that must be put on your machines from the first-party networks (XBL and PSN)," community manager and fighting game legend Seth Killian wrote on Capcom's forum.

"When you add new data to an existing product, there are significant costs to do so charged by the first parties. On XBL, those costs were covered by Microsoft. As a result, the data is distributed to everyone, so even if you have not bought the new costumes, you can still see them if you're fighting against someone that has because you still received the new data required to display them.

"For Sony, those significant costs are not covered. As a result, you only get the new costume data when you actually buy the costumes. Those that don't buy the costumes can't see them, because the new costume data isn't present on your machine, and so you only see costumes you already have the data to represent."

Killian added: "The story is a bit more complicated because the costs of adding new data vary by region in some cases, and some additions are free, or free within a certain timeframe, etc., but the bottom line in this particular case is that Sony would [have] charged Capcom significant fees for distributing the new costume data to users that hadn't actually bought the DLC. Microsoft covered those costs, so the costume data is visible to all there.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-01-04-invisible-ps3-ssfiv-costumes-explained



Around the Network

This is pretty bad news for PSN users... what's worse is that a fix is not even looking like to be coming any time soon.



So, do PSN users get to see naked fighters?



Galaki said:So, do PSN users get to see naked fighters?

Unfortunately nope. :P

Original costume/color is shown instead. There's an icon and message displayed in the Vs. screen as well ("costume not purchased" or something).

This only happens for the newest costume pack, however (the December one). The original Street Fighter IV costume set and the first Super costume set are shown even if they are not purchased (probably came on disc?).



It's microsoft consumers that covered that cost not microsoft ;)

If they are playing online that means they already payed.



PROUD MEMBER OF THE PSP RPG FAN CLUB

Around the Network

Interesting.

And I'm sure that was the first dlc that was actually dlc.  I'm sure the rest were just unlocked on disc.  Serves capcom right for charging so much.  At the same time, I'm surprised Microsoft is paying for something and Sony is not--considering how often I've heard the `'PSN has more updates because Sony doesn't charge companies and Microsoft does" arguement on this site.



KylieDog said:

Capcom just cheaping out and using Sony as a excuse.


And you think Sony will remain silent if this isn't true?



KylieDog said:

...Capcom must just be incredibly tight/cheap.


Yes, how dare they try to make money!?



KylieDog said:

...Capcom must just be incredibly tight/cheap.

Actually, it's Sony that's incredibly tight/cheap.  Neither Nintendo or Microsoft charge the publisher for free downloads, why should Sony?



KylieDog said:
jarrod said:
KylieDog said:

...Capcom must just be incredibly tight/cheap.

Actually, it's Sony that's incredibly tight/cheap.  Neither Nintendo or Microsoft charge the publisher for free downloads, why should Sony?

 

Nintendo doesn't do DLC except on 42MB limit games.  Whoo I bet those costs are high.  Microsoft charges its playerbase instead.

Eh, Nintendo does DLC on retail games too.  Even paid DLC like in Tales of Graces (costume packs just like... well, SSF4).  Remember that whole "research" thing? ;)

Sony's scamming pubs, charging them for services that are free on competitor's platform.  All there is to it, but at least direct your bitching properly.