These rules are way too soft, companies will just get around the loopholes easily.
These rules are way too soft, companies will just get around the loopholes easily.
The American public deserves a royalty from the Internet Providers for DARPA's (The American People's) "Intellectual Property" AND ALL of the public land that the provider's lines stretch across.
Switch: SW-5066-1525-5130
XBL: GratuitousFREEK
If the weren't for the *ELECTED* doofuses in washingtub dee see, (THEY SOLD US OUT! CHEAP!) the Internet would be a constantly streaming source of revenue that could pay off the Reagan Memorial National Debt.
Switch: SW-5066-1525-5130
XBL: GratuitousFREEK
Hopefully these policies/rules will all be overturned. It's horrible the the US government is trying to do something like this. I guess the people in charge of us want everyone to suffer...
Tired of big government?
Want liberty in your lifetime?
Join us @
http://www.freestateproject.org
I kinda question the precedent set by a ruling such as this. While on the service this seems like a good idea, you never know how the government may attempt to increase their control of the internet in the future.
Something like this...
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=416374
That being said, preventing companies from beginning BS practices like internet caps or charging by the GB would be nice. I just feel uneasy about the government having that level of control over how the industry is run.
| FreeTalkLive said: Hopefully these policies/rules will all be overturned. It's horrible the the US government is trying to do something like this. I guess the people in charge of us want everyone to suffer... |
Oh yeah, these rules will be rolled back so the telecom companies can move in lockstep with their virtual monopolies to make sure that the only online video you can access on your Comcast connection is Comcast's online video on demand, or other issues very much like it
That's what "liberty" will get us in this case

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
Mr Khan said:
Oh yeah, these rules will be rolled back so the telecom companies can move in lockstep with their virtual monopolies to make sure that the only online video you can access on your Comcast connection is Comcast's online video on demand, or other issues very much like it That's what "liberty" will get us in this case |
Sometimes I wonder if that's what they really want...
Mr Khan said:
Oh yeah, these rules will be rolled back so the telecom companies can move in lockstep with their virtual monopolies to make sure that the only online video you can access on your Comcast connection is Comcast's online video on demand, or other issues very much like it That's what "liberty" will get us in this case |
LOl., That hasn't happened yet. Nor were things moving in that direction. Interesting theory, though.
Tired of big government?
Want liberty in your lifetime?
Join us @
http://www.freestateproject.org
FreeTalkLive said:
LOl., That hasn't happened yet. Nor were things moving in that direction. Interesting theory, though. |
Wouldn't be hard. Get Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, and TimeWarner all thinking that way, and that would be a clean majority of all broadband in the country in a tiered, restrictive system. Customer mobility is very hard when it comes to broadband, so if your provider moved to a user-hostile system, you'd pretty much have one other option in your area (usually your local cable provider vs your local phone providor), and if *both* of them cotton to the idea of making more money charging users per-Gigabyte, then you can either go back to dial-up, or just roll over and take it
The threat of losing customers is weaker than it needs to be to be an effective tool to keep them in line in this case

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.