By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Canada kicks racist butt!

Joelcool7 said:
Kasz216 said:
Joelcool7 said:
Kasz216 said:
 

 

A)  Being off of his meds makes it a different crime.  Reckless endangerment.  Facts of the crime are different... so Invalid.  The actual crime started well before this happened when he went off his meds knowing he'd be a danger.  Reckless Endangerment.

B) Same punishment as any other stabbing.

C) Different facts of the crime.   He had premdiatated stabbing someone.

Unless

C2) He planned to stab someone in particular then decided this guy would do.  In which case, same punishment if he has stabbed as many people as person B.   If not, again... facts of the crime are different and would be reflected in sentencing.

Though if he was dumb enough to actually let people know he was going to stab someone else, i'm pretty sure there are other charges he could be brought up on.

D) He's not intentionally stabbing him then is he?  So.... different facts of the crime?

E) Again, different facts of the crime.   Either way he should be punished MORE serverly.  He is committing two crimes instead of one.  


So let me get this straight your saying a single crime.

Someone is walking down the street bumps into a man and then intentionally kills him

Then isn't a man walking down the street accidently bumps into a man, notices the man is black so he then kills him a different crime?

You said it, different facts of the crime. You can't say the same crime happening differently should have the same punishment or out come.

Again I will say motive is the drive behind sentencing and motive is what helps prisons know how to deal with the criminal. Rehabilititation likelyness to re-offend etc...etc...

No.  It's not a different crime.

The man is black in every case... the person notices he is black in every case.

The person stabs him every case.  The person is sane in every case.

Everything is the same except why they stabbed.

Exactly, why they stabbed. Making it different and again different motive. So it shouldn't be judged to be the same crime as it wasn't their was a different motive.

It doesn't make it different... in the slightest.  There is no actual difference.

The person, fully in their right mind decided to stab someone on the fly.

The motive is irrelevent.  Motive only goes to prove the crime.


That's why "theoretically" people get sent to jail for the maxium then get parole later on.

You don't judge "reformability" until you know... they actually try and reform.


It's awful sloppy to say "He's probably going to reform so lets give him 5 years instead of 10 and if he doesn't... whoops!"


Furthermore... it's dumb to say "He's less likely to reform so lets give him 12 years instead of 10".

Because you know.  Same 2 criminals stabbed for two different reasons.

Neither reform. 

One gets out in 10 years, the other 12.   Where is the justice in that?


We have parole boards for a reason. 



Around the Network
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:




It has actually nothing to do with winning an arugement.

And even in the context of "winning" and arguement which came later it's about making a dumb comparison to hilter.

 I don't think I've ever seen a topic on this site where a person ever officially won (most of the time people just forget about a certain thread, and it dies out

I don't think I have ever won an argument. usually the people participating in the debate (Politically correct statement for argument) All have good points, evidence to support those points and reasons for them supporting those points.

We don't debate to win, we debate to learn, have fun and get to know other forum members. I even debate at times defending positions I disagree with just to see what others think. Its fun to do and its intellectual I actually bet I've learnt more here debating on the forum and other forums then I have in school.

Ease up have some fun. Your not going to win this debate anymore then I will or Sapphy Snake will. Eventually I will stop posting you will stop posting and Sapphy Snake will stop posting. Then a few days weeks or months from now we'll meet up in another thread and have a lot of fun debating with each other once again.

P.S- Good lesson, just because you don't win or get in a debate with a user doesn't mean you should take what they say personally. Everyone has different opinions. Example in this thread Sapphy Snake and I agree and are supporting the same argument. But on another topic not to long ago we disagreed and debated on different sides. Yet I have alot of respect and fun talking with Sapphy and I bet he has alot of fun debating and talking with me. I will probubly even add him to my friends list soon.

In other words we don't debate to win, we don't debate because we dislike a user. Its all supposed to be an enjoyable discussion in which everyone leaves learning things about the others opinions and we all end up making more friends!



-JC7

"In God We Trust - In Games We Play " - Joel Reimer

 

Kasz216 said:


Let me help you out.  Property crimes have the largest rate of recidivism.

http://www.sgc.wa.gov/PUBS/Recidivism/Adult_Recidivism_CY04.pdf

 

Crimes done for economic benefit are done so because... well economic benefit.  So if you beat someone up for their money... you have good incentive to do so again.

If you beat someone up because they are a different race for fun... and you go to jail for a while.

What is your benefit to do so again?


Racists aren't mentally ill or anything... (well some are)

They beat people up of another race by actual choice.  Not compulsion or need.


Therefore rcidivism SHOULD be lower then people of compulsion (crazy) or need (poor).

Doesn't this make the ma bigger threat to society? They're not crazy (and crazy people should be sent to mental institutions, not prison), nor are they doing it out of need (and there could be programs who could help them to get a job and live an honest living). How exactly can you "fix" a racist/homophobe, so the he can ever be released back into society?



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:


Let me help you out.  Property crimes have the largest rate of recidivism.

http://www.sgc.wa.gov/PUBS/Recidivism/Adult_Recidivism_CY04.pdf

 

Crimes done for economic benefit are done so because... well economic benefit.  So if you beat someone up for their money... you have good incentive to do so again.

If you beat someone up because they are a different race for fun... and you go to jail for a while.

What is your benefit to do so again?


Racists aren't mentally ill or anything... (well some are)

They beat people up of another race by actual choice.  Not compulsion or need.


Therefore rcidivism SHOULD be lower then people of compulsion (crazy) or need (poor).

Doesn't this make the ma bigger threat to society? They're not crazy (and crazy people should be sent to mental institutions, not prison), nor are they doing it out of need (and there could be programs who could help them to get a job and live an honest living). How exactly can you "fix" a racist/homophobe, so the he can ever be released back into society?

Short answer?  You don't need to fix them.

Reason why?  They're (racism aside) logical beings.

Why did the racist people beat up that black guy?

Probably because they could get away with it and thought it would be fun.

Well ok.  They got caught, and went to jail for a few years.

What are the chances they are going to beat up a black person again?

Pretty much none because they know they can be caught. 

The actual length of the punishment doesn't matter so long as it's a the risk far outweighs the reward of the slight rush of beating someone up.  In fact increased punishment may be worse, because their economic situation might get worse while in jail.

 

Either that or because they have an anger disorder.  In which case... the anger disorder is the real problem and it's not going to be directed just at people of a certain race.



Joelcool7 said:
SmokedHostage said:

12 years.. really?

Maybe it's because I'm American but that seems like a bit much.


Well criminal harrasment is a sentence of up to ten years. A hate crime adds another 2-years to that sentence. Personally I don't think its too heavy. I mean yes its one bad decision but so is murder and other crimes like assualt.

Plus with such a hefty sentence its going to prevent any prick from doing this again and if someone does it shows Canada has no tollerance for racism.

I like the fact that I live in a multicultural country where all people of all races and religions can live free of fear of racist pricks.


That is bullshit, if you commit a crime and the motive is you hate the person, you get 10 years, if you commit a crime and the motive is that you hate all people of that ethnicity, you get 12 years.

 

However, I don't care all that much cos the guys are dicks :P



Around the Network
Kasz216 said:


Let me help you out.  Property crimes have the largest rate of recidivism.

http://www.sgc.wa.gov/PUBS/Recidivism/Adult_Recidivism_CY04.pdf

 

Crimes done for economic benefit are done so because... well economic benefit.  So if you beat someone up for their money... you have good incentive to do so again.

If you beat someone up because they are a different race for fun... and you go to jail for a while.

What is your benefit to do so again?


Racists aren't mentally ill or anything... (well some are)

They beat people up of another race by actual choice.  Not compulsion or need.


Therefore rcidivism SHOULD be lower then people of compulsion (crazy) or need (poor).

That document infuriates me. Recidivism rates basically highlight everything wrong with our criminal justice system.

I hate the US prison system so much

I'm going cross-eyed



In Mother Russia you do not commit the hate crime, the hate crime commits you.

Hating is okay, harrassing is terrible.



I'm Unamerica and you can too.

The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread: 



The Hunt Begins 4/20/2010 =D

Khuutra said:
Kasz216 said:


Let me help you out.  Property crimes have the largest rate of recidivism.

http://www.sgc.wa.gov/PUBS/Recidivism/Adult_Recidivism_CY04.pdf

 

Crimes done for economic benefit are done so because... well economic benefit.  So if you beat someone up for their money... you have good incentive to do so again.

If you beat someone up because they are a different race for fun... and you go to jail for a while.

What is your benefit to do so again?


Racists aren't mentally ill or anything... (well some are)

They beat people up of another race by actual choice.  Not compulsion or need.


Therefore rcidivism SHOULD be lower then people of compulsion (crazy) or need (poor).

That document infuriates me. Recidivism rates basically highlight everything wrong with our criminal justice system.

I hate the US prison system so much

I'm going cross-eyed

Yeah... it's annoying.  In general I think that's the way it is everywhere though.  From what I can find anway.  The Recidivism rates seem pretty standard.  In your new home the recidivism rate is apparenty 75% in the provincial system.  Unsure of federal.

A harder stat to find out then you'd think tooFor some reason Canada doesn't like to look at that kind of thing.

It doesn't help that... well prisons are hellholes where if anything criminal, racism and anti-social behavior are actually reinforced.

It also shows how dumb drug laws are.

In general, NOBODY is doing prison right.



In Michigan they'd get 90 days and a pat on the back... sigh



Ask stefl1504 for a sig, even if you don't need one.

Kasz216 said:

Yeah... it's annoying.  In general I think that's the way it is everywhere though.  From what I can find anway.  The Recidivism rates seem pretty standard.  In your new home the recidivism rate is apparenty 75% in the provincial system.  Unsure of federal.

A harder stat to find out then you'd think tooFor some reason Canada doesn't like to look at that kind of thing.

It doesn't help that... well prisons are hellholes where if anything criminal, racism and anti-social behavior are actually reinforced.

It also shows how dumb drug laws are.

In general, NOBODY is doing prison right.

This is another one of those cases where I wish I was a Miracle Man-esque benevolent dictator.