damndl0ser said:
"if u take away the "Window7 profit", then MS is really not that big" I was pointing out that even if you took away windows 7 and the rest of MS that the EDD division made more money than all of Sony. So if they aren't that big then I guess Sony is even smaller. What does the percentages of the EDD have to do with it? You stated that xbox 1 lost a shit ton of money, well so has the PS3, probably more so than the xbox 1. So there really is no need in pointing that out unless you want to see the flaws that the PS3 has had as well. After all all the profits the PS2 had made was eaten up by the PS3. Besides, I would imagine that before the end of this gen, MS will have turned a profit over all. (MS didn't care how much money they lost with the original Xbox, they were just getting their feet in the door to the gaming world. And I figure that by the time the next box comes out it will be even more profitable than it is now.) |
Well, If you take in count their revenues I doubt Sony is smaller than the EDD. But comparing Sony to the EDD makes no sense and has never been my point. You are the one trying to protect MS using Sony.
I m not the one trying to say "Sony is doing good !". Sony is not doing great. That is not my point too.0
And yeah, MS didnt care about losing money. They never care. That is MY point. They are a piece of shit that has always succeed using a tree step technic based on the unlimited window cash cow : We fail, We fail, We succeed !
I m not trying to say MS is not doing great. I m trying to say : this company is THE shit, their profit/revenu ratio is so high that this shows they are selling a product that cost them nothing to produce (window) at a very high price, AND, most of their non-window product are failure that only survive because of the window cash cow.
Time to Work !







