kowenicki said:
SamuelRSmith said:
Sweeping statements, much? In modern history, the UK has suffered at the hands of Irish Republicanism more than it has Muslim Extremism.
|
Presumably he is talking globally...
BUT.. this isnt a helpful topic/thread at all.
|
Well, he specifically mentioned "America and Europe", then outlined exceptions to American terrorist incidents. I'm outlining the exception of the UK from Europe. I'm also going to assume that other European countries have higher priorities than Muslim Extremists, too.
---
(No longer directed at Kowenicki), I think a very important thing to remember is that a large number of Muslim terrorist attacks are not directly related to religion. The vast majority of Muslim-related incidents come from Israel and Russia, where the attacks are less on a twisted-take on the religion, and more a struggle for independence. The fact that the people involved are Muslim is almost (but, not entirely, in Israel's case), coincidental. If you are to take those incidents out of the scale, the global threat of "Islam" is much lower. In fact, over the past decade, places like Colombia with the FARC are at far greater risk than anywhere with Islam.
Terrorism isn't all bad, either. It can lead to brilliant changes, and move humanity forward. Boston Tea Party, anyone? Or the Suffragettes?