By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - GT5 to have motorcycles Kaz says maybe, and KZ3 beta footage

akuseru on 27 October 2010
slowmo said:
akuseru said:
slowmo said:
akuseru said:
kowenicki said:
evolution_1ne said:
kowenicki said:
evolution_1ne said:

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=270710

"The environment we have right now allows us to drive motorcycles, but we need to get Gran Turismo 5 done first," Polyphony boss Kazunori Yamauchi told the latest issue of PSM3. "Once that's out of the way, if there's a strong demand for bikes, that's something we'd consider."


LOL.. is it finished or what?


guess not, I read some where there was a slight frame rate drop and they have been working on that.....

edit: found it http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=270424


that sounds.... pathetic, to be honest.

Basically he is saying that on some very very rare occasions it may "dip" below 60fps... dip? like to 50 or so fps... and thats the reason for the delay?  I'm not buying that at all.

Why won't you 'buy' that? Seeing that you tend to 'buy' whatever nonsense coming from certain other camps, you should really try to save up some money and 'buy' this "pile of shit", because it might be the real deal Kaz is selling it :D

Some devs actually put a lot of care into their games, and do not actually crown their own games as "king of X games" until it actually is the king, and Kaz wants this game to be the undisputed king. For Kaz, this takes time.

Take your time Kaz, make your game as good as you can. It's your work and you decide when it releases.

Fact for you

Released game > Unreleased game

It's time to let the project go and release it already.

Wow, that is some fact you dropped on me there... NOT.

Here's an 'ACTUAL FACT' for you:

More than half of the games released this gen should've been longer in development. That's why we're seeing all the bugs, all the patches and even the DLC. Because people like you can't wait for games to be released properly and the devs rush their games out.

Or maybe you were more than happy with, let's say Gears 2 online at launch? Or maybe you're happy with how the new Fallout is playing? If you answer yes on any of those questions, I won't waste anymore of my time on you.

I can play a released game, I cannot play a unreleased game so it is a fact no matter how much you dislike it.

I have no intention of picking up the new Fallout for now so I cannot comment on it.

I found Gears 2 fine for me at launch but then again I wasn't one of those people who bitched about the fact it wasn't Gears 1 and they couldn't run around never using anything but the shotgun or sniper rifle.  Sure there were some niggles but it wasn't hopelessly broken or unenjoyable to play.  The mistakes they made on Gears 2 could have been avoided with a beta which they are rectifying for Gears 3.  I actually think Gears 2 was more enjoyable around Title update 3 than it is now they've pandered to the shotgun crew.  I personally didn't have an issue with it being released as I didn't have the problems many did.  It wasn't the bugs that bothered people most, they just whined because they didn't want to adapt to the new playing style imo.

 

BTW - I cannot wait for the crow you'll be eating when all the GT5 bugs come out, and they will come.  Longer development time does not mean less bugs in any shape or form but you keep pretending thats the case if you like. 


When did you ever say that PLAYING the game was the fact in question. You said Released game > Unreleased games which, for me, it clearly doesn't if the game is not functioning properly. LMAO.

I don't care how Gears is gameplay wise and that you can run around with shotgun and whatever. That's not what I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is that one of the most anticipated games on "The KING of Online" had MAJOR online issues at launch and not seeing a patch for months. This is something that should've been fixed before the launch of Gears 2, not Gears 3. FAIL.

And will I be eating crow? No, I won't, because I don't care enough about your 'internet forum customs' to be doing that. My life goes on without even thinking about what I said in this thread. And did I say there would be no bugs in the game? No I didn't. Do I believe development time have something to do with more bugs being ironed out? YES I do! You even said so yourself: "The mistakes they made on Gears 2 could have been avoided with a beta which they are rectifying for Gears 3." - So BETA is not a part of development time? Fail much? Like really, how can you put "The mistakes they made on Gears 2 could have been avoided with a beta which they are rectifying for Gears 3." and "Longer development time does not mean less bugs in any shape or form but you keep pretending thats the case if you like." in the same post? Try to convince me I got it all wrong by spewing some more bullshit now. I'll be waiting... OH, and waiter: Bring me a year supply of strawberry flavored crow while you're at it. I know you can't afford your own, so I'll buy it for you. I'm nice am I not?

Dismissed.



Around the Network
slowmo on 28 October 2010
akuseru said:
slowmo said:
akuseru said:
slowmo said:
akuseru said:
kowenicki said:
evolution_1ne said:
kowenicki said:
evolution_1ne said:

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=270710

"The environment we have right now allows us to drive motorcycles, but we need to get Gran Turismo 5 done first," Polyphony boss Kazunori Yamauchi told the latest issue of PSM3. "Once that's out of the way, if there's a strong demand for bikes, that's something we'd consider."


LOL.. is it finished or what?


guess not, I read some where there was a slight frame rate drop and they have been working on that.....

edit: found it http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=270424


that sounds.... pathetic, to be honest.

Basically he is saying that on some very very rare occasions it may "dip" below 60fps... dip? like to 50 or so fps... and thats the reason for the delay?  I'm not buying that at all.

Why won't you 'buy' that? Seeing that you tend to 'buy' whatever nonsense coming from certain other camps, you should really try to save up some money and 'buy' this "pile of shit", because it might be the real deal Kaz is selling it :D

Some devs actually put a lot of care into their games, and do not actually crown their own games as "king of X games" until it actually is the king, and Kaz wants this game to be the undisputed king. For Kaz, this takes time.

Take your time Kaz, make your game as good as you can. It's your work and you decide when it releases.

Fact for you

Released game > Unreleased game

It's time to let the project go and release it already.

Wow, that is some fact you dropped on me there... NOT.

Here's an 'ACTUAL FACT' for you:

More than half of the games released this gen should've been longer in development. That's why we're seeing all the bugs, all the patches and even the DLC. Because people like you can't wait for games to be released properly and the devs rush their games out.

Or maybe you were more than happy with, let's say Gears 2 online at launch? Or maybe you're happy with how the new Fallout is playing? If you answer yes on any of those questions, I won't waste anymore of my time on you.

I can play a released game, I cannot play a unreleased game so it is a fact no matter how much you dislike it.

I have no intention of picking up the new Fallout for now so I cannot comment on it.

I found Gears 2 fine for me at launch but then again I wasn't one of those people who bitched about the fact it wasn't Gears 1 and they couldn't run around never using anything but the shotgun or sniper rifle.  Sure there were some niggles but it wasn't hopelessly broken or unenjoyable to play.  The mistakes they made on Gears 2 could have been avoided with a beta which they are rectifying for Gears 3.  I actually think Gears 2 was more enjoyable around Title update 3 than it is now they've pandered to the shotgun crew.  I personally didn't have an issue with it being released as I didn't have the problems many did.  It wasn't the bugs that bothered people most, they just whined because they didn't want to adapt to the new playing style imo.

 

BTW - I cannot wait for the crow you'll be eating when all the GT5 bugs come out, and they will come.  Longer development time does not mean less bugs in any shape or form but you keep pretending thats the case if you like. 


When did you ever say that PLAYING the game was the fact in question. You said Released game > Unreleased games which, for me, it clearly doesn't if the game is not functioning properly. LMAO.

I don't care how Gears is gameplay wise and that you can run around with shotgun and whatever. That's not what I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is that one of the most anticipated games on "The KING of Online" had MAJOR online issues at launch and not seeing a patch for months. This is something that should've been fixed before the launch of Gears 2, not Gears 3. FAIL.

And will I be eating crow? No, I won't, because I don't care enough about your 'internet forum customs' to be doing that. My life goes on without even thinking about what I said in this thread. And did I say there would be no bugs in the game? No I didn't. Do I believe development time have something to do with more bugs being ironed out? YES I do! You even said so yourself: "The mistakes they made on Gears 2 could have been avoided with a beta which they are rectifying for Gears 3." - So BETA is not a part of development time? Fail much? Like really, how can you put "The mistakes they made on Gears 2 could have been avoided with a beta which they are rectifying for Gears 3." and "Longer development time does not mean less bugs in any shape or form but you keep pretending thats the case if you like." in the same post? Try to convince me I got it all wrong by spewing some more bullshit now. I'll be waiting... OH, and waiter: Bring me a year supply of strawberry flavored crow while you're at it. I know you can't afford your own, so I'll buy it for you. I'm nice am I not?

Dismissed.


"When did you ever say that PLAYING the game was the fact in question. You said Released game > Unreleased games which, for me, it clearly doesn't if the game is not functioning properly. LMAO."

I stopped reading there, find someone else to pester with your bullshit.



akuseru on 28 October 2010

"When did you ever say that PLAYING the game was the fact in question. You said Released game > Unreleased games which, for me, it clearly doesn't if the game is not functioning properly. LMAO."

I stopped reading there, find someone else to pester with your bullshit.

hahahaha!!! what a joke! not that I expected anything else when I saw your name and avatar, but come on...



slowmo on 28 October 2010
akuseru said:

"When did you ever say that PLAYING the game was the fact in question. You said Released game > Unreleased games which, for me, it clearly doesn't if the game is not functioning properly. LMAO."

I stopped reading there, find someone else to pester with your bullshit.

hahahaha!!! what a joke! not that I expected anything else when I saw your name and avatar, but come on...

Well if you already made your mind up about me before talking it speaks volumes of you as a poster.