By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Wait, a 8.0?

NintendoTogepi on 11 December 2007
Dallinor said:
NintendoTogepi said:
RolStoppable said:
The quality of the textures in the game (for instance the buildings in Piazza Delphino) isn't high. Also, in certain parts of the game the framerate could drop drastically.

If you ask me, 8.0 for Sunshine is fair. The animations are well done, but the overall quality of the graphics doesn't justify a higher score.

 The textures seem fine to me, and so does the frame rate....

An 8.0 for the game in 2002 is waaay too low...

They also only gave Wind Waker a 9.0 in 2003....when I still think it's the best looking game ever graphically.

 

The Legend Of Zelda: The Wind Waker meets Crysis...


 That's an AWFUL picture of The Wind Waker (and probably a beta one, that tree thing is blackish-brown in the actual game). Pictures for the game suck for some reason, it's seriously hard to capture how good the game looks in a picture.

And I love the art style & cel shading of Wind Waker. It looks good, pleasant and whimsy-full.

Crysis just looks realistic...not nessecary best looking.



Top 3 favorite games: Super Mario Galaxy, The Sims 2 (PC), The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker