By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Epic citadel on iphone 4 surpasses early 360 games graphicly

forest-spirit on 07 October 2010

So that's how great a game can look if you take out interaction, characters, physics, ai, animations and stuff. Brilliant!



Around the Network
mai on 07 October 2010
forest-spirit said:

So that's how great a game can look if you take out interaction, characters, physics, ai, animations and stuff. Brilliant!

Well, they did show characters and interaction in stage demo (google Project Sword), but it looked pathetic gameplay-wise and boring.



milkyjoe on 07 October 2010

I'd like to see them do this on the current iPhone to the same level of graphical quality with that town being full of people, like it would be in an actual game. I suspect I may be waiting a while.



VGChartz

IMU1808 on 07 October 2010
kowenicki said:
Doobie_wop said:
kowenicki said:
Doobie_wop said:
kowenicki said:
Doobie_wop said:

Amped 3 (2K Sports)
Call of Duty 2 (Activision Inc.)
Condemned: Criminal Origins (SEGA Corp.)
FIFA Soccer 06 Road to 2006 FIFA World Cup (Electronic Arts Inc.)
GUN (Activision)
Kameo: Elements of Power (Microsoft Game Studios and Rare Ltd.)
Madden NFL 06 (Electronic Arts)
NBA 2K6 (2K Sports)
NBA LIVE 06 (Electronic Arts)
Need for Speed Most Wanted (Electronic Arts) 
NHL 2K6 (2K Sports) 
Perfect Dark Zero (Microsoft Game Studios and Rare Ltd.)
Peter Jackson s King Kong: The Official Game of the Movie (Ubisoft)
Project Gotham Racing 3 (Microsoft Game Studios and Bizarre Creations Ltd.)
Quake 4 (id Software and Activision)
Ridge Racer 6 (Namco Ltd.)
Tiger Woods PGA TOUR 06 (Electronic Arts)
Tony Hawk s American Wasteland (Activision)

Those are the early 360 games (2005), it looks better than all of them. I'd say it looks better than some games even released in 2008, looks alot like Fable 2, but as people mentioned, it's pretty much a tech demo with nothing going on. Makes you think about how good something like Uncharted 2 or Resident Evil 5 could look if nothing ever happens.


And what about listing every Wii game and all the early PS3 games...  for instance it was widely reported that Ridge Racer 6 (360) looked better than Ridge Racer 7 (PS3)... not to mention RFOM (awful imo).

This is a bogus comparison and pretty much a trolling exercise.


What? The 360 was released in 2005, most of it's games had a year less of development on them and he brought up the 360. I already said that the I-phone game has nothing going on, so that's the reason why it can push that kind presentation on a limited device. I don't know why you would bring in your comparisons between consoles into this, this thread isn't about the 360 vs the PS3, it's about the early 360 titles not looking good as one game released years later that also happens to be a priced tech demo. You then go on to troll against PS3 exclusive games for no reason at all, it's just your overreaction to anyone mentioning anything that could possibly be seen as negative towards the 360.

You also shouldn't troll the Wii, when it has several games that look better than those launch games.

 

Whatever.

Why does the OP only mention the 360?  Please tell me?  If this had PS3 instead of 360 in the title there would be a forum melt down.

Worse still... If this article was headed:

"Epic citadel looks better than almost all Wii games"

Complaints would have been huge and It would have been locked.  Simple as that.

So please spare me the fake

 

Maybe. No need to give me shit over it though. I gave my thought on the topic, wrote down some reasons and went on my merry way. Had he said the same thing about the PS3, I would have agreed with him, because outside of Motorstorm, every PS3 game looked like crap at launch. Your better off reporting the OP instead of making yourself look bad in this thread.



Only the OP looks bad in this thread imo, he saw it and his immediate thought was (wrong as it turns out) this "game" looks better than early 360 full games, he didnt think Wii, he didnt thing early PS3... why is that?

Some research makes the point of the thread and the author of the thread look a bit silly.  I have this "tech demo" on my iphone 4.0.  It is very far from being a fully functioning game and cannot be compared to a fully functioning game.... not on the 360, the PS3, the Wii or even the PSP...

Sorta defense, dude. Maybe it's just because 360 came first and this is about tech more so than simple graphics comparison?

OT: It's nice but I'm not very impressed when compared to 360. Mainly when you factor in the difference in screen rez and very little on screen.



Lostplanet22 on 07 October 2010

I am the only who thought this looked like Oblivion =p?



 

Around the Network
ConnorJCP on 07 October 2010
IMU1808 said:
kowenicki said:
Doobie_wop said:
kowenicki said:
Doobie_wop said:
kowenicki said:
Doobie_wop said:

Amped 3 (2K Sports)
Call of Duty 2 (Activision Inc.)
Condemned: Criminal Origins (SEGA Corp.)
FIFA Soccer 06 Road to 2006 FIFA World Cup (Electronic Arts Inc.)
GUN (Activision)
Kameo: Elements of Power (Microsoft Game Studios and Rare Ltd.)
Madden NFL 06 (Electronic Arts)
NBA 2K6 (2K Sports)
NBA LIVE 06 (Electronic Arts)
Need for Speed Most Wanted (Electronic Arts) 
NHL 2K6 (2K Sports) 
Perfect Dark Zero (Microsoft Game Studios and Rare Ltd.)
Peter Jackson s King Kong: The Official Game of the Movie (Ubisoft)
Project Gotham Racing 3 (Microsoft Game Studios and Bizarre Creations Ltd.)
Quake 4 (id Software and Activision)
Ridge Racer 6 (Namco Ltd.)
Tiger Woods PGA TOUR 06 (Electronic Arts)
Tony Hawk s American Wasteland (Activision)

Those are the early 360 games (2005), it looks better than all of them. I'd say it looks better than some games even released in 2008, looks alot like Fable 2, but as people mentioned, it's pretty much a tech demo with nothing going on. Makes you think about how good something like Uncharted 2 or Resident Evil 5 could look if nothing ever happens.


And what about listing every Wii game and all the early PS3 games...  for instance it was widely reported that Ridge Racer 6 (360) looked better than Ridge Racer 7 (PS3)... not to mention RFOM (awful imo).

This is a bogus comparison and pretty much a trolling exercise.


What? The 360 was released in 2005, most of it's games had a year less of development on them and he brought up the 360. I already said that the I-phone game has nothing going on, so that's the reason why it can push that kind presentation on a limited device. I don't know why you would bring in your comparisons between consoles into this, this thread isn't about the 360 vs the PS3, it's about the early 360 titles not looking good as one game released years later that also happens to be a priced tech demo. You then go on to troll against PS3 exclusive games for no reason at all, it's just your overreaction to anyone mentioning anything that could possibly be seen as negative towards the 360.

You also shouldn't troll the Wii, when it has several games that look better than those launch games.

 

Whatever.

Why does the OP only mention the 360?  Please tell me?  If this had PS3 instead of 360 in the title there would be a forum melt down.

Worse still... If this article was headed:

"Epic citadel looks better than almost all Wii games"

Complaints would have been huge and It would have been locked.  Simple as that.

So please spare me the fake

 

Maybe. No need to give me shit over it though. I gave my thought on the topic, wrote down some reasons and went on my merry way. Had he said the same thing about the PS3, I would have agreed with him, because outside of Motorstorm, every PS3 game looked like crap at launch. Your better off reporting the OP instead of making yourself look bad in this thread.



Only the OP looks bad in this thread imo, he saw it and his immediate thought was (wrong as it turns out) this "game" looks better than early 360 full games, he didnt think Wii, he didnt thing early PS3... why is that?

Some research makes the point of the thread and the author of the thread look a bit silly.  I have this "tech demo" on my iphone 4.0.  It is very far from being a fully functioning game and cannot be compared to a fully functioning game.... not on the 360, the PS3, the Wii or even the PSP...

Sorta defense, dude. Maybe it's just because 360 came first and this is about tech more so than simple graphics comparison?

OT: It's nice but I'm not very impressed when compared to 360. Mainly when you factor in the difference in screen rez and very little on screen.

kowenick, is there something wrong?
Because your having a major cry over, him using xbox 360 in his thread title.
and this thread has nothing to do with ps3, or wii, so dont try and bring them into this.
Id say your trolling, not Doobie.



Smart Men answer questions, Wise men ask questions.
Gamers play games, True Gamers support Gaming

tuscaniman on 07 October 2010

Its Leo-J so of course the title says "Looks better than early 360 games", even though we know if this is the case it looks better than early PS3 games as well. One look at Resistance:Fall of Man and you would realize this. If everyone remembers right the PS3 was behind the 360 graphically when it released and it played catch up, caught up, and eventually surpassed. Now the 360 will play catch up and at least equal with Gears of War 3.



IMU1808 on 07 October 2010
tuscaniman said:

Its Leo-J so of course the title says "Looks better than early 360 games", even though we know if this is the case it looks better than early PS3 games as well. One look at Resistance:Fall of Man and you would realize this. If everyone remembers right the PS3 was behind the 360 graphically when it released and it played catch up, caught up, and eventually surpassed. Now the 360 will play catch up and at least equal with Gears of War 3.


If that's what you think then FINE, GREAT, SURE. Why the outcry for it to be mentioned? This is about TECH, not console graphics comparisons. Must some people be so over defensive about this stuff? It's like graphics is the only thing gamers care about these days...



nightsurge on 07 October 2010
ConnorJCP said:

kowenick, is there something wrong?
Because your having a major cry over, him using xbox 360 in his thread title.
and this thread has nothing to do with ps3, or wii, so dont try and bring them into this.
Id say your trolling, not Doobie.

If it has nothing to do with the PS3 or Wii then it has nothing to do with the 360 either.

PS3 early games looked just as bad or worse than early 360 games.  All Wii games look worse than any PS3 or 360 game.

The OP is making a nice stealth troll attempt and since this site is majority PS3 fans it will go unnoticed and unpunished.



nightsurge on 07 October 2010
IMU1808 said:
tuscaniman said:

Its Leo-J so of course the title says "Looks better than early 360 games", even though we know if this is the case it looks better than early PS3 games as well. One look at Resistance:Fall of Man and you would realize this. If everyone remembers right the PS3 was behind the 360 graphically when it released and it played catch up, caught up, and eventually surpassed. Now the 360 will play catch up and at least equal with Gears of War 3.


If that's what you think then FINE, GREAT, SURE. Why the outcry for it to be mentioned? This is about TECH, not console graphics comparisons. Must some people be so over defensive about this stuff? It's like graphics is the only thing gamers care about these days...

Sure seems to be about graphics, not tech.  No mention of tech anywhere in the OP or the title or the thread.

Even if it were about tech, why would he not mention the other console tech, or handheld tech?

Quit trying to sugar coat it.  We know the OP, Leo-J, and this is no surprise at all coming from him.