By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Scoffers and unbelievers - please try to explain this

lestatdark said:

Actually, historically speaking, it was not the bible who was written by "people influenced by the holy spirit", instead that's reserved to the scriptures and passages inside. The bible is actually just a very pinpoint compilation of those scriptures and manuscripts compiled over centuries, both the old testament (written in tandem with jewish beliefs and scriptures, and the new testament, which is unique to Christian ideology).

The bible itself, as I  said, was compiled in the 3rd century, during the ascension of the Byzantine Roman empire, with Christianity as the emerging religion. Emperor Constantine with the conjunction of Christian priests and clergy were the original compilers of the bible. 

I may not be Christian myself (I'm a wiccan), but I have two heavy-Christian believers in my family (my grandparents from my dad's side of the family), so I was taught a lot of the history of the bible when I was young. 

So the contradiction is still true. The bible itself was written and compiled by men who chose to carefully put only those scriptures that "fitted" the Christian ideology of the early Christian era, leaving aside a lot of controversial scriptures that were later found in the Dead Sea.
Amongst these controversial scriptures, there are some that contradict the depiction of Jesus Christ and it's relationship with Maria Magdalene, especially the scriptures written by Magdalene herself.

Yes, the scriptures that compose the bible may have some "higher power" influencing or inspiring the people that wrote them, but in the end, man and it's preconceptions, prejudices and hidden agendas left their influence in the final product itself.

FTR the Roman Empire was still unified during Constantine's reign.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

Around the Network
sapphi_snake said:
lestatdark said:

Actually, historically speaking, it was not the bible who was written by "people influenced by the holy spirit", instead that's reserved to the scriptures and passages inside. The bible is actually just a very pinpoint compilation of those scriptures and manuscripts compiled over centuries, both the old testament (written in tandem with jewish beliefs and scriptures, and the new testament, which is unique to Christian ideology).

The bible itself, as I  said, was compiled in the 3rd century, during the ascension of the Byzantine Roman empire, with Christianity as the emerging religion. Emperor Constantine with the conjunction of Christian priests and clergy were the original compilers of the bible. 

I may not be Christian myself (I'm a wiccan), but I have two heavy-Christian believers in my family (my grandparents from my dad's side of the family), so I was taught a lot of the history of the bible when I was young. 

So the contradiction is still true. The bible itself was written and compiled by men who chose to carefully put only those scriptures that "fitted" the Christian ideology of the early Christian era, leaving aside a lot of controversial scriptures that were later found in the Dead Sea.
Amongst these controversial scriptures, there are some that contradict the depiction of Jesus Christ and it's relationship with Maria Magdalene, especially the scriptures written by Magdalene herself.

Yes, the scriptures that compose the bible may have some "higher power" influencing or inspiring the people that wrote them, but in the end, man and it's preconceptions, prejudices and hidden agendas left their influence in the final product itself.

FTR the Roman Empire was still unified during Constantine's reign.

That's right, but it was during constantine's reign that the shift to the Byzantine era began, especially circa 324 when he moved the empire's capital from Nicomedia to Byzantium. Also, it's only due to conventions that Byzantine and Roman empire are said separately, because they were basically the same during that era.



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"

lestatdark said:
sapphi_snake said:
lestatdark said:

Actually, historically speaking, it was not the bible who was written by "people influenced by the holy spirit", instead that's reserved to the scriptures and passages inside. The bible is actually just a very pinpoint compilation of those scriptures and manuscripts compiled over centuries, both the old testament (written in tandem with jewish beliefs and scriptures, and the new testament, which is unique to Christian ideology).

The bible itself, as I  said, was compiled in the 3rd century, during the ascension of the Byzantine Roman empire, with Christianity as the emerging religion. Emperor Constantine with the conjunction of Christian priests and clergy were the original compilers of the bible. 

I may not be Christian myself (I'm a wiccan), but I have two heavy-Christian believers in my family (my grandparents from my dad's side of the family), so I was taught a lot of the history of the bible when I was young. 

So the contradiction is still true. The bible itself was written and compiled by men who chose to carefully put only those scriptures that "fitted" the Christian ideology of the early Christian era, leaving aside a lot of controversial scriptures that were later found in the Dead Sea.
Amongst these controversial scriptures, there are some that contradict the depiction of Jesus Christ and it's relationship with Maria Magdalene, especially the scriptures written by Magdalene herself.

Yes, the scriptures that compose the bible may have some "higher power" influencing or inspiring the people that wrote them, but in the end, man and it's preconceptions, prejudices and hidden agendas left their influence in the final product itself.

FTR the Roman Empire was still unified during Constantine's reign.

That's right, but it was during constantine's reign that the shift to the Byzantine era began, especially circa 324 when he moved the empire's capital from Nicomedia to Byzantium. Also, it's only due to conventions that Byzantine and Roman empire are said separately, because they were basically the same during that era.

True, though the Byzantine Empire is tha name attributed to the Eastern Roman Empire during the Middle Ages.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

sapphi_snake said:
lestatdark said:
sapphi_snake said:
lestatdark said:

Actually, historically speaking, it was not the bible who was written by "people influenced by the holy spirit", instead that's reserved to the scriptures and passages inside. The bible is actually just a very pinpoint compilation of those scriptures and manuscripts compiled over centuries, both the old testament (written in tandem with jewish beliefs and scriptures, and the new testament, which is unique to Christian ideology).

The bible itself, as I  said, was compiled in the 3rd century, during the ascension of the Byzantine Roman empire, with Christianity as the emerging religion. Emperor Constantine with the conjunction of Christian priests and clergy were the original compilers of the bible. 

I may not be Christian myself (I'm a wiccan), but I have two heavy-Christian believers in my family (my grandparents from my dad's side of the family), so I was taught a lot of the history of the bible when I was young. 

So the contradiction is still true. The bible itself was written and compiled by men who chose to carefully put only those scriptures that "fitted" the Christian ideology of the early Christian era, leaving aside a lot of controversial scriptures that were later found in the Dead Sea.
Amongst these controversial scriptures, there are some that contradict the depiction of Jesus Christ and it's relationship with Maria Magdalene, especially the scriptures written by Magdalene herself.

Yes, the scriptures that compose the bible may have some "higher power" influencing or inspiring the people that wrote them, but in the end, man and it's preconceptions, prejudices and hidden agendas left their influence in the final product itself.

FTR the Roman Empire was still unified during Constantine's reign.

That's right, but it was during constantine's reign that the shift to the Byzantine era began, especially circa 324 when he moved the empire's capital from Nicomedia to Byzantium. Also, it's only due to conventions that Byzantine and Roman empire are said separately, because they were basically the same during that era.

True, though the Byzantine Empire is tha name attributed to the Eastern Roman Empire during the Middle Ages.


Correct, though the Byzantine Empire had many shifts in it's territory during the thousand years that composed it, especially in two major centuries (6th and 11th century) when it had almost the same territory as the original Roman Empire. 

This conversation is probably going way off-topic now, but I think it's always good to shed some historical significance to events, such as the creation of the Christian Bible, which in the end, is just another book. 



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"

lestatdark said:


Correct, though the Byzantine Empire had many shifts in it's territory during the thousand years that composed it, especially in two major centuries (6th and 11th century) when it had almost the same territory as the original Roman Empire. 

This conversation is probably going way off-topic now, but I think it's always good to shed some historical significance to events, such as the creation of the Christian Bible, which in the end, is just another book. 

Yeah. People should know that it was not initially a singular book.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

Around the Network
Farmageddon said:
zarx said:
Farmageddon said:

He, my post is broken :(

I guess it was probably stupid to quote all that.

Well, it wasn't anything usefull anyway.


congrats you broke the thread

Is it too late to say it was n porpuse?

*glares angrily* Yes...



-dunno001

-On a quest for the truly perfect game; I don't think it exists...

This doesn't prove anything..



 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.enterprisecorruption.com



Oh gosh, ANOTHER one of these threads...?



Nintendo Network ID: Cheebee   3DS Code: 2320 - 6113 - 9046

 

Cheebee said:

Oh gosh, ANOTHER one of these threads...?


it's interesting.

 

 

Economic Collapse in September?

By: Clif Droke

Posted Sunday, 18 May 2008

A rumor is swirling around the Internet that an inglorious end to the U.S. economy is imminent.  Unlike previous rumors to this effect, this one carries the weight of recent events in the financial realm and has many believing the rumor will come to pass.

http://news.goldseek.com/ClifDroke/1211138541.php

 

 

apart from that, you've gotta guy who on July 18, 2008 predicted the sharpest market downturn to the date since 9/11/01.

http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.983582/msg/624ab36903fa8696

(link to individual message replicated as above)

 

 

http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.983582/browse_thread/thread/aad550b590f931bf?pli=1

(link to thread from which the post comes from)

 

 

This certainly raises questions and makes ya(for me at least) rethink how the current condition of the worldwide economy came to be and how global economy works in general.