By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Homefront interview , i kinda feel sad for these guys =s

priteshmodi on 06 October 2010

More footage for those interested.

Story trailer: http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-homefront/101160

E3 Demo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVB2Tto9RW8



Around the Network
zgamer5 on 06 October 2010

looks better then all modern games out their, but really its going to flop.



Being in 3rd place never felt so good

patapon on 06 October 2010
Acevil said:
disolitude said:
Acevil said:

I'm going to be honest, I don't even know this game existed, but for some reason it looks fun like Battlefield 2 Bad Company.

These guys made Frontlines:Fuel of War...a game that came out a month after COD4, hence no one heard of it or played. Had COD4 not come out as it did...We'd all be playing Frotlines right now.


That sucks for them. Activision ruined the hopes and dreams of this company!

Well, at least Activision is doing their job!



SecondWar on 06 October 2010

Some people are missing things here.

I played Frontlines: Fuel of War. It was a game with a interesting concept but really was pretty average, and the concept did not work well when it was transferred to multiplayer. Im not sure how its changed between the two games, although Homefront looks more interesting.

Also, Kaos Studios will not go bust as they are owned by THQ. However, all the posts about he game bombing are probably accurate, as THQ has a rubbish record when it comes to shooters in this generation.



disolitude on 06 October 2010
SecondWar said:

Some people are missing things here.

I played Frontlines: Fuel of War. It was a game with a interesting concept but really was pretty average, and the concept did not work well when it was transferred to multiplayer. Im not sure how its changed between the two games, although Homefront looks more interesting.

Also, Kaos Studios will not go bust as they are owned by THQ. However, all the posts about he game bombing are probably accurate, as THQ has a rubbish record when it comes to shooters in this generation.


If Sniper can sell 500,000 copies and be the craptastic game it is, I think this won't "bomb" by any means.



Around the Network
patapon on 06 October 2010

I dislike fps these days but I like what I saw here. Battlefield 2 demo was sooo fucking fun! And this looks like a refined version of it so I just might buy



SecondWar on 06 October 2010
disolitude said:
SecondWar said:

Some people are missing things here.

I played Frontlines: Fuel of War. It was a game with a interesting concept but really was pretty average, and the concept did not work well when it was transferred to multiplayer. Im not sure how its changed between the two games, although Homefront looks more interesting.

Also, Kaos Studios will not go bust as they are owned by THQ. However, all the posts about he game bombing are probably accurate, as THQ has a rubbish record when it comes to shooters in this generation.


If Sniper can sell 500,000 copies and be the craptastic game it is, I think this won't "bomb" by any means.

Actually, thats a fair point. Forgotten about that thing, I still see it everywhere.



richardhutnik on 06 October 2010

Note that they said 32 players in a single battle.  On the XBox 360, that is not normal.  The PS3 has multiple choices but not the 360.  That is a key difference.  I believe Kaos Studios is working on this.  When I spoke to them in the past, after meeting them to see Frontlines: Fuel of War, I told them the had to push this large-scale angle.

A sad part in this in general is that developers think they have THE app when they are working on something, and they seldom pan put.



Severance on 06 October 2010
richardhutnik said:

Note that they said 32 players in a single battle.  On the XBox 360, that is not normal.  The PS3 has multiple choices but not the 360.  That is a key difference.  I believe Kaos Studios is working on this.  When I spoke to them in the past, after meeting them to see Frontlines: Fuel of War, I told them the had to push this large-scale angle.

A sad part in this in general is that developers think they have THE app when they are working on something, and they seldom pan put.


How many Players can reach handle? 32 right?



I live for the burn...and the sting of pleasure...
I live for the sword, the steel, and the gun...

- Wasteland - The Mission.

disolitude on 06 October 2010
Severance said:
richardhutnik said:

Note that they said 32 players in a single battle.  On the XBox 360, that is not normal.  The PS3 has multiple choices but not the 360.  That is a key difference.  I believe Kaos Studios is working on this.  When I spoke to them in the past, after meeting them to see Frontlines: Fuel of War, I told them the had to push this large-scale angle.

A sad part in this in general is that developers think they have THE app when they are working on something, and they seldom pan put.


How many Players can reach handle? 32 right?

Still 16...but I think that we've established that more players /= better game when Resistance 2 came out. It depends on the game and Halo Reach with any more than 16 people would not be playable.

For me any more than 8 on a map  is too much with all the zaney craziness that is going on.