By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - The Official Halo: Reach review thread

Reviews are very helpful , it the scores by themselves that a little misreading. I'm one who totally ignores 100% and read the lower reviews. Even the lower score reviews has a lot of good to say about Reach which is a good sign. It's was the lower score reviews (totally ignore the 100% scores)that help me decided to buy 360 for Forza 3. One reviewer gave Forza 3 a lower score because the races lengths after season 4 took 15-30 minutes  to complete. This is when I decide to buy FM3.



Around the Network
binary solo said:

Meta-wise it doesn't stack up against the best of the best for 360 in 2010. With ME2 only having 1 out of 98 reviews coming in at below 90, as far as Meta Critic goes ME2 is untouchable (ME2 even beats last year's uber-Meta game UC2 for least reviews below 90).

Reach is still ahead of RDR though in that RDR has 9 reviews below 90, and H:R only has 4 as of this post.

Current Meta as of this post 93.

This game is going to win a good number of GOTY's but I think this year the spoils will be shared among a few games, unlike last year's lopsided affair. 360 console exclusive exclusive exclusive (ME2 [still a console exclusive for the purposes of 2010 GOTY) H:R), in addition to RDR may get 360 the most GOTYs for 2010.


I think for every GOTY award RDR wins, I'll bang my head against the wall one time. That game is not that good.



themanwithnoname's law: As an America's sales or NPD thread grows longer, the probabilty of the comment "America = World" [sarcasticly] being made approaches 1.

Halo : Reach is currently at a 93 at Metacritic. But damn, I didn't expect so many reviews to be under 9.



Who's the best Pac, Nas, and Big. Just leave it to that.

PLAYSTATION®3 is the future.....NOW.......B_E_L_I_E_V_E

Slaughterhouse Is The Sh*t  .... NOW ........ B_E_L_I_E_V_E

Doobie_wop said:
Icyedge said:
 

The way he review the multiplayer really does seem like he think it is the more advance multiplayer of all console FPS.

A lot has changed in three years, Halo 3 was great back then but during that time, other FPS's have come and done some great thing's, so Halo: Reach has more competition now with recently released titles.

You and Iwar missed the part I left in the quote. Personally, I dont have any problem with low score, like the 7 the campaing got. I have problem when the score isnt consequent with the review. I know its relative, but his multiplayer part dont even mention a negative aspect. Hes really praising it all the way. Did you read it?



When you average all 36 of the ratings on the OP, you get 93.7 which would be rounded to 94. I would be completley happy with Reach getting a 94 considering thats what Halo 3 got.



Around the Network

93/100 is a very good score.



Reach said:

Reality is this pure and simple... Reach = 10. Enough said... I dont care about giant Bomb that review is biased and that guy is probably a Halo hater.


Buddy you have some problems you need to work on. People are allowed to have different opinions. Also you haven't even played the game yet as it isn't out so HOW do YOU know it is a 10? Just because the guy doesn't give Halo a 10 doesn't mean that he is a troll that just hates Halo.



The review's really aren't that surprising. Everybody know's it's going to be a great game. This is the only Xbox360 game,that I'm getting this year. I'll have this game in 2 days. lol



good thread CGI-Quality. You sure know how to put together a better thread than I ever could. lol



CGI-Quality said:

The game may hold on to atleast a 93 Meta after all.


Well, it only has 27 reviews, it can go up too. I think it will get plenty of perfect scores to keep it well in the 90's. The problem with the superhyped games is we only know how good this game is until months from now, once the hype goes down.



 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)