93 is a solid Meta. Should hold at least 91 or 92 to the end though, and perhaps even 93 or 94, depending on the 8s and 9s. Anyone read any of the sub 9 reviews?

In your opinion, IMO if reach has a better story than Halo 1, and a better multiplayer than Halo 2 then it will be the best fps ever.

I read the gamesradar one since I was curious about the only 80. It was well written, splitten in 2 categories, campaign and multiplayer. Honestly, after reading the campaign review I thought it were going to score 8 but it scored 7, no big deal there, he wasnt praising it. But, after reading their multiplayer section, I really thought it was going to score a 10, it scored 9. Strangely, their Halo 3 multiplayer score is 10 and the reviewer said himself that halo reach multiplayer is even better. The way he review the multiplayer really does seem like he think it is the more advance multiplayer of all console FPS. Why does he give it a 9 then? Read it, its interesting. Maybe gamesradar wanted hits...

I read the gamesradar one since I was curious about the only 80. It was well written, splitten in 2 categories, campaign and multiplayer. Honestly, after reading the campaign review I thought it were going to score 8 but it scored 7, no big deal there, he wasnt praising it. But, after reading their multiplayer section, I really thought it was going to score a 10, it scored 9. Strangely, their Halo 3 multiplayer score is 10 and the reviewer said himself that halo reach multiplayer is even better. The way he review the multiplayer really does seem like he think it is the more advance multiplayer of all console FPS. Why does he give it a 9 then? Read it, its interesting. Maybe gamesradar wanted hits...

Well, there are a couple of headscratchers in other review I've read so far to be fair. The IGN review tries to say the number of maps for multiplayer is lacking by comparing it to the Halo 3 maps plus its 12 DLC maps, which is a baffling comparison to make imo. Gametrailers was complaining about the beam rifle and plasma grenade launcher being too strong, but from what I can remember from the beta, killing people with those two weapons isn't exactly a walk in the park.

It's hard to imagine anybody on the fence who hasn't played a Halo game, though I do wonder what the thoughts of people who've never played it before are about these reviews.

Well, there are a couple of headscratchers in other review I've read so far to be fair. The IGN review tries to say the number of maps for multiplayer is lacking by comparing it to the Halo 3 maps plus its 12 DLC maps, which is a baffling comparison to make imo. Gametrailers was complaining about the beam rifle and plasma grenade launcher being too strong, but from what I can remember from the beta, killing people with those two weapons isn't exactly a walk in the park.

It's hard to imagine anybody on the fence who hasn't played a Halo game, though I do wonder what the thoughts of people who've never played it before are about these reviews.

Well, there are a couple of headscratchers in other review I've read so far to be fair. The IGN review tries to say the number of maps for multiplayer is lacking by comparing it to the Halo 3 maps plus its 12 DLC maps, which is a baffling comparison to make imo. Gametrailers was complaining about the beam rifle and plasma grenade launcher being too strong, but from what I can remember from the beta, killing people with those two weapons isn't exactly a walk in the park.

It's hard to imagine anybody on the fence who hasn't played a Halo game, though I do wonder what the thoughts of people who've never played it before are about these reviews.