By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - New Reach multiplayer vids.

"Ssssswwwwaaaat!"



I live for the burn...and the sting of pleasure...
I live for the sword, the steel, and the gun...

- Wasteland - The Mission.

Around the Network
damndl0ser said:
evolution_1ne said:

that was actually pretty boring imo , I think the saddest part about this game is it's criminally small player count. what is the point of forge world huh? I mean it's gonna make for some real kick ass episodes of red vs. blue but other than that??? Halo Reach maps are screaming for sum 32 vs. 32 spartan on elite total devastation, but this is 360 soo...... maybe next gen.....


I personally hate 32 vs 32 games.  They are always such a mess and I don't like them.  But to each his own, if you enjoy that good for you.  

Agreed. For me anything bigger than 10v10 seems like a clusterfuck, and makes my role feel insignificant.  in a 32 v 32 player match I could go 20 kills 0 deaths and my team can still get crushed or I can go 0-20 and win, it's just a mess.



the first video looked boring as hell but the 2nd one seemed ok



Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!

Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st

Serious_frusting said:

the first video looked boring as hell but the 2nd one seemed ok


Multiplayer games always seem boring when you are watching them, but when you play them its another story.



I live for the burn...and the sting of pleasure...
I live for the sword, the steel, and the gun...

- Wasteland - The Mission.

Severance said:
Serious_frusting said:

the first video looked boring as hell but the 2nd one seemed ok


Multiplayer games always seem boring when you are watching them, but when you play them its another story.


I think it was more to do with the level design of the first video to be honest



Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!

Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st

Around the Network
tuscaniman said:
evolution_1ne said:

that was actually pretty boring imo , I think the saddest part about this game is it's criminally small player count. what is the point of forge world huh? I mean it's gonna make for some real kick ass episodes of red vs. blue but other than that??? Halo Reach maps are screaming for sum 32 vs. 32 spartan on elite total devastation, but this is 360 soo...... maybe next gen.....


I'd like you to name me a fps on your precious ps3 that is better than this because it offers more players. Killzone 2? Nope not hardly and I have that game. Its average at best. MAG? Don't make me laugh. Battlefield or COD? Multiplats. You can take your trolling elsewhere because if you knew anything about Halo you would know it does not need 32v32 or even 16v16. It wouldn't work and it would be a complete mess. Just like KZ2 is a huge unstructured spamfest online.



I think killzone2 is more than average. Your telling him to take his trolling somewhere else,yet your trolling on KZ2 and mag. I personally love the halo series,but I'm not going to get all up in arms,when someone else doesn't.



God I hate it when people compare killzone to halo... IMO i rekon its trying to compare forza to GT....

Its ludacris...

Example: Killzone 2 is great no doubt, single and mulitplayer are pretty good and the graphics are damn impressive, but people who own both Halo 3 and Killzone 2 and have played both multiplayer and single player know just how much Halo 3 blows it out of the water. It doesnt matter whether kz2 can play alot more players at the same time online, in the end has the fun factor that is greater in sheer amount.

Don't get me wrong, playing killzone 2 online is fun but halo 3 online is just fun fun fun fun fun fun!!! It why people keep coming back to it again and again and again.

And once again people who have both Halo 3 and Killzone 2 are the only ones who truly understand me when I say these things.



Ps. THESE VIDS ARE GREAT =)

 

I SERIOUSLY CANNOT WAIT FOR REACH!!!!

 

=) =) =)



tuscaniman said:
evolution_1ne said:

that was actually pretty boring imo , I think the saddest part about this game is it's criminally small player count. what is the point of forge world huh? I mean it's gonna make for some real kick ass episodes of red vs. blue but other than that??? Halo Reach maps are screaming for sum 32 vs. 32 spartan on elite total devastation, but this is 360 soo...... maybe next gen.....


I'd like you to name me a fps on your precious ps3 that is better than this because it offers more players. Killzone 2? Nope not hardly and I have that game. Its average at best. MAG? Don't make me laugh. Battlefield or COD? Multiplats. You can take your trolling elsewhere because if you knew anything about Halo you would know it does not need 32v32 or even 16v16. It wouldn't work and it would be a complete mess. Just like KZ2 is a huge unstructured spamfest online.

Like I said, it doesnt matter whether its 32 vs 32 or 8 vs 8...

 

The Halo fun factor is what sets it way above the rest if the pack....



evolution_1ne said:

that was actually pretty boring imo , I think the saddest part about this game is it's criminally small player count. what is the point of forge world huh? I mean it's gonna make for some real kick ass episodes of red vs. blue but other than that??? Halo Reach maps are screaming for sum 32 vs. 32 spartan on elite total devastation, but this is 360 soo...... maybe next gen.....

it allways awesome for the Lolzzzz haha

PDZ had 32 Players and was a good game but a mess at the same time... Kz2 SpamFest or MAG wich is horrible... the only game i liked on Ps3 with many online players was the 1st Resistance. anyhow 4vs4 and 5vs5 and the way to go for competitive game. 32vs32 or 16vs16 is too much people and a online mess!

So u think is 360 that cant do it... PDZ says hi ... lool