Hynad said:
Killiana1a said:
Crytek is up there at the top in terms of development studios who take the due diligence and devotion to routinely put out gems of games.
|
Far Cry, Crysis, Crysis: Warhead, and Crysis 2... gems of games?
In what world?
They're really great graphics achievement, but as far as most other aspects go... not so much.
Other than this, your comment about Molyneux was spot on.
|
It is difficult for FPS games to be revolutionary unlike other genres. Hell, IGN lists both Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2 in the top 25 Xbox 360 games.
Speaking from a single player experience, both Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2 are nothing compared to Far Cry and Crysis, in my opinion. The campaigns sucked and only offered one way to approach the mission, guns blazing.Far Cry and Crysis offered all sorts of approaches, same as Crysis. You could go in Rambo guns blazing, stealth, or avoid the enemies altogether. My only complaint with Crysis is that it was too short and delved into the alien shit way too quickly. I wanted 2 to 3 more levels sabotaging the Korean army.
As for multiplayer, the only FPS series I trust to do it right everytime is Battlefield.