selnor said:
|
It's Epic Games. What did ya expect :D.
Wow graphic wars already without even talking about how fuckin aweosme Bulletstorm is...
Bulletstorm's graphics are fantastic and the gameplay look so much fun. Really can't wait for this!

selnor said:
|
It's Epic Games. What did ya expect :D.
Wow graphic wars already without even talking about how fuckin aweosme Bulletstorm is...
Bulletstorm's graphics are fantastic and the gameplay look so much fun. Really can't wait for this!

Solid_Snake4RD said:
yes i have played ME2 and that why i was recommending it as one of the good ones abt REACH,we don't know shit about it till next month i'm not saying that REACH won't be good but just saying all those will be the best out there and then not even mentioning the biggest current games and some of the biggest upcoming is what selnor always does |
Easy fella.
IMO GT5 is far better than U2, GOW3 and KZ3. In fact KZ3 is the least impressive for me right now. MAinly because I can think of 4 FPS's coming out that are more impressive technically.
Sure KZ3 has some nice water, or great lighting. But as an overall engine others impress me more and happen to be in the same genre.
If I really wanted it to be about console wars I would have put Halo Reach at the top. But honestly from the heart 3rd party devs are making the consoles sing that bit more right now.
this is like what would happen is a lot of other shooters had style and a sense of humor
| huaxiong90 said: And here we go again with the graphics arguments. The game looks great, yes, but I have seen better. I'll leave it at that. |
Please cmon. I am referring to overal technicality. GFX are just 1 part of showing a systems power. Scale, amount of enemies, draw distance etc are all part of the power of a console. Hence my view. Anyone can do 10 enemies in a small play area.
The challenge is more onscreen with big environments ( or big enemies ) whilst looking good to.
selnor said:
|
yeah i know but they aren't
as first party will still be better and you put REACH there and not KZ2 and some of the old big games,thats bullshit like you always do
| selnor said: Technically, GOW3 is much easier to do with the scale in the way the camera nad viewpoints are done. And Reach is easily technically on GT5's level. Just because realsim isnt the graphical focus of Halo doesnt mean, that huge playable areas, high quality visulas mixed with 60 Plus advanced AI at once isnt a huge technical achievement. Cant wait to see the huge Warthog battle in Misson 4 that we saw a glimpse of in the gameplay trailer. |
no its GOW3 is a masterpeice
and Reach is nowhere near GT5,just drop it.you will push everything as the best
| CGI-Quality said: You see selnor, the responses in this thread are why I didn't go the route of a graphics debate. I can understand your enthusiam for Bulletstorm, regardless. |
Thing is, many here only refer to GFX alone.
The reason why a said technically to you and gave you my list, is that I consider things like scale, amount of onscreen action, draw distance etc to.
If I wanted it to be a console war, I would have put the 360 exclusive Reach at the top. But although impressive in overall tech. From what we have seen my list is what I satnd by.
And sorry, KZ3 isnt impressing me for overall tech comapred to other FPS's. I prefer GT5 for PS3 exclusives. IT's really awesome all around.
Solid_Snake4RD said:
yeah i know but they aren't as first party will still be better and you put REACH there and not KZ2 and some of the old big games,thats bullshit like you always do |
OK. So you want me to put KZ2 there when I think it's 'overall tech is not as good as the games Ive mentioned? The fact that the enemy count and playable areas are not as great as these other FPS's instantly puts it out of that list for me.
Hell GT5 is there. It's my number 1 PS3 exclusive for tech ahcievement. I looked at Motorstorm 3 and was very unimpressed. TLG has me impressed but I need to see more.
IMO 3rd party devs are leading the way on 'WHOLE' tech power right now.
someone PLEASE agree with selnor so he wil drop it and we can actally talk about the game at hand
PLEASE!

In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!
"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"
For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!
| selnor said: Easy fella. IMO GT5 is far better than U2, GOW3 and KZ3. In fact KZ3 is the least impressive for me right now. MAinly because I can think of 4 FPS's coming out that are more impressive technically. Sure KZ3 has some nice water, or great lighting. But as an overall engine others impress me more and happen to be in the same genre. If I really wanted it to be about console wars I would have put Halo Reach at the top. But honestly from the heart 3rd party devs are making the consoles sing that bit more right now. |
offcourse it is most impressive to you cause you just won't admit it that it will come of the best
and obviously eveything you want to be the best,you will push it as the best
hell you even gunned Forza,Alan Wake as the best and look what they came out with
i remember you saying GT5 won't be as good as F3 and even you knew then that you were being delusional
you have started the whole thing over again,you just don't listen
Solid_Snake4RD said:
yeah i know but they aren't as first party will still be better and you put REACH there and not KZ2 and some of the old big games,thats bullshit like you always do
no its GOW3 is a masterpeice and Reach is nowhere near GT5,just drop it.you will push everything as the best |
I'm not pushing either GT5 or Reach as the best.
And yes Reach's engine is getting huge praise from every media that got to play 3 missions. Declaring the scale and size of Reach as breathtaking. It was the scale that caught ALL 3 media outlets attention. If your wondering IGN, Gamespot and Eurogamer.