By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Who do you think has the larger install base 360 or ps3

binary solo said:

According to my proprietary mathematical modelling 360 has a larger install base by 576,221.5 units. With the standard 10% MoE.

There, that should end all current and future debate.

Care to show your work or are the numbers just pure bullshit



Around the Network
ArnoldRimmer said:

I think there might indeed be more people who own a PS3 than people who own a 360.

The number of shipped console is always higher than the number of people who own a console, one reason being that some people own more than one console.

From my experience, the percentage of people who own more than one 360 is a lot higher than the number of people who more than one PS3. One major reason is the fact that the 360 can so easily be modified to play pirated games and that Microsoft bans modded consoles at least once a year. Every single 360 owner I know owns a modded one. Obviously that is not representative for all 360 owners, but I'm sure the percentage of people who own a modded 360 is quite significant, just like the number of owners of modded PSPs.

Since Microsoft bans modded consoles at least once a year, these people usually own at least two 360s. One that got banned and which is used to play pirated games offline, and one unmodded 360 which is used for playing original games that the person really wants to play online. If a modded console gets broken - which is almost guaranteed to happen sooner or later if it's not one of the newer revisions - then these consoles are not returned to Microsoft for repair because they refuse to repair it or they would charge a ridiculous amount of money. So they buy another 360, mod it, and the old one usually goes in the trash or some cupboard. There is a 360 internet forum that I visit from time to time where I have seen lots of people saying that meanwhile they have 4 or more 360s at home.

And even many owners of unmodded consoles buy more than one. As everyone knows, the failure rate of the 360 was ridiculously high for most of the 360's lifespan, and at some point even 3 years of warranty against RROD were over. Repairing those units doesn't make sense, those people will instead simply buy a new one.

So I think there might indeed be more owners of PS3s. But in the end - what does does that mean anyway? I think for the manufacturers other numbers are much more important than the number of owners.

The install base is what people go off of when they are trying to decide which console they should give the most attention to for profit because the bigger the install base the more potential buyers but with the 360s failrate their install base isn't near their sales so people just assume it has a larger install base which I feel is marking companies biased towards it or rather in favor of it 



Antabus said:
rakugakist said:
Icyedge said:
rakugakist said:
Mr Puggsly said:
Icyedge said:
 

But why shops would have more PS3s sitting than 360s? Im not taking any side or saying VGchartz numbers are wrong, im really wandering why since both console sale at a similar rate. Im a sales manager myself (not in the video game business) we only keep more of stuff that sales more. Does Sony ask for bigger minimum order than Microsoft? Does Sony deserve more store than Microsoft?

Maybe MS just hasen't had the opportunity to flood the stores with consoles yet? Lets bear in mind the 360 is selling significantly better than the PS3 at the moment.


Ha ha ha, flood the stores.  These arguments are so funny.

True, as if its Sony or MS that decide how much consoles stores are to order. Tough, its possible Microsoft isnt able to fill all their orders at the moment. I guess thats what he meant.

The flooding one is my favorite.  Sony can't force stores to buy their system. It makes no sense at all and is hardly an argument.

Why not? They don't sell you less than X numbers of consoles per order. ;)

But Sony has shipped more PS3's than they needed because retailers overestimated the demand for PS3 slim a bit and 360 shipped numbers are closer to current sales numbers because of the current demand of 360s.

By 2 million, get real 



hsrob said:

This thread again?  Despite a 42% failure rate, it's still currently the best selling home console in the world, the thing must be awesome!

no it isn't, that would be the ps2, followed by the wii, and the failrate might be one of the reasons it sells more since so many people have had to replace it not to mention banned consoles 



unknown_soul89 said:
Antabus said:

Why not? They don't sell you less than X numbers of consoles per order. ;)

But Sony has shipped more PS3's than they needed because retailers overestimated the demand for PS3 slim a bit and 360 shipped numbers are closer to current sales numbers because of the current demand of 360s.

By 2 million, get real 

No. By something like 1 million or less. Do you think that every shipped console is sold instantly? Of course not. There are always consoles in supply chain. I think that figure is usually something in range of 1 million.



Around the Network
unknown_soul89 said:
hsrob said:

This thread again?  Despite a 42% failure rate, it's still currently the best selling home console in the world, the thing must be awesome!

no it isn't, that would be the ps2, followed by the wii, and the failrate might be one of the reasons it sells more since so many people have had to replace it not to mention banned consoles 


Currently it is the best selling home console. take a look at the weekly numbers!



Antabus said:
unknown_soul89 said:
Antabus said:

Why not? They don't sell you less than X numbers of consoles per order. ;)

But Sony has shipped more PS3's than they needed because retailers overestimated the demand for PS3 slim a bit and 360 shipped numbers are closer to current sales numbers because of the current demand of 360s.

By 2 million, get real 

No. By something like 1 million or less. Do you think that every shipped console is sold instantly? Of course not. There are always consoles in supply chain. I think that figure is usually something in range of 1 million.

yes but theres no reason to believe that 360s range is much different, all we know is that VG chartz isn't accurate besides those numbers for shipped came out awhile ago



unknown_soul89 said:
Antabus said:
unknown_soul89 said:
Antabus said:

Why not? They don't sell you less than X numbers of consoles per order. ;)

But Sony has shipped more PS3's than they needed because retailers overestimated the demand for PS3 slim a bit and 360 shipped numbers are closer to current sales numbers because of the current demand of 360s.

By 2 million, get real 

No. By something like 1 million or less. Do you think that every shipped console is sold instantly? Of course not. There are always consoles in supply chain. I think that figure is usually something in range of 1 million.

yes but theres no reason to believe that 360s range is much different, all we know is that VG chartz isn't accurate besides those numbers for shipped came out awhile ago

Yes there is. Slim launched few weeks ago and it was(is?)  supply constrained. Which pretty much means that most of those shipped consoles were sold as soon as possible. Just before that, we don't know how much older models were shipped to retailers. It is possible that ms stopped shipping them to sell out the old models before the slim.



Antabus said:
unknown_soul89 said:
Antabus said:
unknown_soul89 said:
Antabus said:

Why not? They don't sell you less than X numbers of consoles per order. ;)

But Sony has shipped more PS3's than they needed because retailers overestimated the demand for PS3 slim a bit and 360 shipped numbers are closer to current sales numbers because of the current demand of 360s.

By 2 million, get real 

No. By something like 1 million or less. Do you think that every shipped console is sold instantly? Of course not. There are always consoles in supply chain. I think that figure is usually something in range of 1 million.

yes but theres no reason to believe that 360s range is much different, all we know is that VG chartz isn't accurate besides those numbers for shipped came out awhile ago

Yes there is. Slim launched few weeks ago and it was(is?)  supply constrained. Which pretty much means that most of those shipped consoles were sold as soon as possible. Just before that, we don't know how much older models were shipped to retailers. It is possible that ms stopped shipping them to sell out the old models before the slim.

at most it creates a margin of error of a few hundred thousand I doubt it effects the final result unless their really close in install base



unknown_soul89 said:
Antabus said:
unknown_soul89 said:
Antabus said:
unknown_soul89 said:
Antabus said:

Why not? They don't sell you less than X numbers of consoles per order. ;)

But Sony has shipped more PS3's than they needed because retailers overestimated the demand for PS3 slim a bit and 360 shipped numbers are closer to current sales numbers because of the current demand of 360s.

By 2 million, get real 

No. By something like 1 million or less. Do you think that every shipped console is sold instantly? Of course not. There are always consoles in supply chain. I think that figure is usually something in range of 1 million.

yes but theres no reason to believe that 360s range is much different, all we know is that VG chartz isn't accurate besides those numbers for shipped came out awhile ago

Yes there is. Slim launched few weeks ago and it was(is?)  supply constrained. Which pretty much means that most of those shipped consoles were sold as soon as possible. Just before that, we don't know how much older models were shipped to retailers. It is possible that ms stopped shipping them to sell out the old models before the slim.

at most it creates a margin of error of a few hundred thousand I doubt it effects the final result unless their really close in install base

Good. Now that we could agree on that, what if there is a margin of 500k for the usual rate of shipped/sold in "favor" of 360 and for ps3 the same 500k would be a "negative" for ps3. How would those shipped/sold figures look like then?

Ms would have 500k (I don't think they had that much but let's play with this) consoles on supply chain and ps3 would have 1,5m consoles on supply chain. MS shipped was 41,7m and sold units would have been 41,2m or so. PS3 had 38,1m shipped and sold numbers would have been 36,6m or so. How much are those figures off from VGC numbers? Is it within the margin of error?