unknown_soul89 said:
Antabus said:
unknown_soul89 said:
Antabus said:
unknown_soul89 said:
Antabus said:
Why not? They don't sell you less than X numbers of consoles per order. ;)
But Sony has shipped more PS3's than they needed because retailers overestimated the demand for PS3 slim a bit and 360 shipped numbers are closer to current sales numbers because of the current demand of 360s.
|
By 2 million, get real
|
No. By something like 1 million or less. Do you think that every shipped console is sold instantly? Of course not. There are always consoles in supply chain. I think that figure is usually something in range of 1 million.
|
yes but theres no reason to believe that 360s range is much different, all we know is that VG chartz isn't accurate besides those numbers for shipped came out awhile ago
|
Yes there is. Slim launched few weeks ago and it was(is?) supply constrained. Which pretty much means that most of those shipped consoles were sold as soon as possible. Just before that, we don't know how much older models were shipped to retailers. It is possible that ms stopped shipping them to sell out the old models before the slim.
|
at most it creates a margin of error of a few hundred thousand I doubt it effects the final result unless their really close in install base
|
Good. Now that we could agree on that, what if there is a margin of 500k for the usual rate of shipped/sold in "favor" of 360 and for ps3 the same 500k would be a "negative" for ps3. How would those shipped/sold figures look like then?
Ms would have 500k (I don't think they had that much but let's play with this) consoles on supply chain and ps3 would have 1,5m consoles on supply chain. MS shipped was 41,7m and sold units would have been 41,2m or so. PS3 had 38,1m shipped and sold numbers would have been 36,6m or so. How much are those figures off from VGC numbers? Is it within the margin of error?