By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 18 Game Thread

lol

ok so mario definitely is trying to get out of the crosshair -> Scum (or twisted bomb) that's his 3rd defensive post in a row after many joke posts.

Vet that sure was quick! and although I do myself suspect sabby... well that was quick...

 

c03n3nj0 said:

And how come no one has suspected me? I feel both happy and absolutely ignored. :'(

that can be arranged =)



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Around the Network

IFFFF i'm not mistaken:

9 out of 12 players have voted 

4 votes SM128 

GoW3ever, Stefl, hephaestos, Silver

3 vote Sabby

Trangen, Vette, SM128

1 votes Nikells 

Sabby

1 vote GoW

Dister

Yet to vote

c03n3nj0, nikells, Noname



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Can please someone make a votecount? I somehow lost track on how much votes are there and which persons got voted for...

Edit: Guess I was too late... hehe...



trangentspree said:

People who I think or know are Town: tanstalas, dsister, stefl, Gnizmo (that dejected tone has to be real), Nikells (don't know why really, just an impression), theRepublic (convincing lines of argument.)

He's put me in a list with the majority of the confirmed/dead pro-town players.

Also: I have something I want to ask j0.



Nikells said:
trangentspree said:

People who I think or know are Town: tanstalas, dsister, stefl, Gnizmo (that dejected tone has to be real), Nikells (don't know why really, just an impression), theRepublic (convincing lines of argument.)

He's put me in a list with the majority of the confirmed/dead pro-town players.

Also: I have something I want to ask j0.


Yes, and when I saw that it made me further suspicious of you and a little less comfortable with dsister and stefl. Soleron picked a lot of players who he thought were pro-town, but Soleron could realistically only know for certain the alignment of one (or maybe two) more player(s) in this game - his own mafiaso buddicos. It's entirely possible that he would try to hide those players in his list by either saying they are not suspicious (like you), or by not saying very much about them at all (like sabby or j0 - or well like you again really!) After all he only remarks "don't know why really, just an impression" regarding his thinking that you are protown.



Around the Network

For those saying its a quick vote,  are you guys just that slow of readers?   He put forth a convincing arguement,  I read through the entire thing, and I agreed with the majority of it.    Hence my vote.   I dont really see what the big deal is.  



First of all, I'd like to say that I'm sorry for not being here often. It's because I've been very busy with work and some other stuff.

But anyways, that was a good post by trangentspree. I can see how I seem suspicious butI haven't really said anything out of the ordinary throughout the whole game except for when I posted my opinion on Stefl stating that I considered him innocent. I was confused at that certain part because of the way Godofwar_3ever replied to my post. I was considering the possibility of a insane cop over a Mafia cop because if Stefl was a Mafia cop, I didn't see why he would say Dsister was innocent, (because that would be very risky for them both if he was a Mafia cop). But later on he posted his explanation on what his role was and now he most likely is pro-town (my opinion).

So apart from that, I haven't really done anything scummy. As for Soleron, don't any of you think he posted those comments because of the attention some of the players had attracted? Like when Supermario wa the prime suspect due to his day one "no vote" and his ordinary defence? The same applies to Vetteman, Godofwar, and Silver_tiger (for lurking if I remember correctly).

As for Nikells, his statement somewhat makes me think he could be pro-town but at the same time I still suspect him because the classic defence usually is; "I am pro-town OR I know I'm pro-town" or anything along those lines. (But this kind of defence does work and does sound convincing at times) But right now I'm torn between thinking keeping my vote on him because his defence wasn't all that bad.  (was actually pretty convincing)

What has caught my attention most is the how vetteman and supermario both hopped abroad the bandwagon so fast. People say I wanted DAY 1 to end (and that was after about 36 hours) and then Vetteman today stated "I know this is going to look horrible but this game needs to get on a roll Vote: Nikells" http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=113175&page=82

And don't forget that was ANOTHER bandwagon that Vetteman participated in. Stuff like this is easy to miss but honestly, there alot more to be suspicious about Vetteman AND Supermario (he joined the bandwagon as well almost immediately). I know I said that I thought Supermario was innocent but really it seems as if he wanted to get rid of me to save is ass as he currently has 4 votes to his name. Didn't Vetteman and Supermario both realise that it was POSSIBLE for me to come and defend myself or did they have other plans? Oh yeah, I forgot that this is the same Supermario who has acted weird throughout the whole game and didn't hesitate to drop the hammer on RCT yesterday and this is the same Vetteman who has attracted a considerable amount of attention. Kudos to everyone who didn't join the bandwagon without letting me explain myself.

I would like to vote for Supermario but that could mean the end of him as he currently has four votes to his name. So if everyone is okay with it, can I vote off Supermario now?




Wait. Do I have a basic misunderstanding about where the hammer vote lies in this game? I thought it was standard practice for the hammer vote to be 1 of HALF the number of players currently alive.

There are 12 players right now. So isn't it 7 votes to lynch?



trangentspree said:

Wait. Do I have a basic misunderstanding about where the hammer vote lies in this game? I thought it was standard practice for the hammer vote to be 1 of HALF the number of players currently alive.

There are 12 players right now. So isn't it 7 votes to lynch?


I thought there were only 11 players alive...so I though 5 votes would be enough. Anyway I'm just not trying to smack a hammer vote unless everyone agrees.




trangentspree said:

Wait. Do I have a basic misunderstanding about where the hammer vote lies in this game? I thought it was standard practice for the hammer vote to be 1 of HALF the number of players currently alive.

There are 12 players right now. So isn't it 7 votes to lynch?


Eurgh. That's meant to be "PLUS 1 of HALF" but the "plus" symbol doesn't seem to want to appear there.

I'll post again in less than an hour from now!