The last day ended before I could contribute (I would have voted for RCTJunkie anyway based on the evidence provided.)
Now its day again here are my thoughts, you pompous bastard:

Stefl
While being wary is one thing: I'd feel extremely uneasy lynching Stefl after he's revealed a genuine mafia member to the town (why would a mafia member roleclaim and share information like that with the town so early on in the game?) I'd certainly like some clarification on his role though. And to hear what he has to say: particularly if he has some more investigation results from last night. I think we'd be foolish to become so paranoid we look a gift horse in the mouth.

Supermario
Supermario is easily my biggest suspect. He'd previously been lurking so much we assumed he would get modkilled but jumped in at the last minute and saved himself. His few posts have been utterly cavalier in attitude and extremely suspicious. I'd vote for him now but I'd like to see everybody's thoughts first.

Vetteman
After initally lurking, Vetteman has done little besides defend himself for the whole game.
He very strongly defended SM128's sudden hammer blow yesterday but has not actually done anything overtly suspicious yet.

I'm currently rereading through the entire thread again for clues given what we now know.

One amusing thing I noticed - after Khuutra requested doctor protection saying it would scare off mafia attacks, and players chiming in that this always happens and it works, Soleron posted:

"The reason it's an awesome strategy is, even in full possession of that knowledge, the killing roles still act exactly as he wants them to."

Soleron was on the opposing mafia team to Khuutra and Khuutra was killed in a mafia attack that night.

How devilish of him.

I did not defend SM128s hammer vote,  where are you people coming up with this stuff.  Explain to me how you came to this conclusion?

For all of you asking me to explain myself....There is nothing to explain, I saw that RCT was proven guilty by the cop and voted for him, just like everyone else had done. If you didn't want the day to end you shouldn't have voted yet.

I don't see how is this can be interpreted as anything other than defending his sudden hammer vote as you're attacking someone simply because they're pissed off at him for doing so.

You also seemed pleased that twilight arrived abruptly, why was that?

Stefl isn't the cop. Both the cop and deputy are dead.

We don't know what stefl is exactly.

The point of contention isn't who you voted for its that you seemed to want to limit discussion and end things as early as possible even though other people clearly had more to say.

Either way....

@Nikells
If others had more to say they shouldn't have voted in the first place and left someone at L-1.....

That is a fair point however:

You knew they had already voted while they didn't know that you would. You had all the information and knew the day would end when you hammer voted. Stefl himself, the source of the guilty verdict, even unvoted at the last minute to prevent it from happening.

I'm not saying you don't have a point but it makes you look super suspicious because you don't appear to care what the rest of the town think (even the person who's evidence you're apparently basing the vote on.)

Holy shit.