kowenicki said:
AkibaFan said:
kowenicki said:
Lostplanet22 said:
kowenicki said:
NoddyHolder said:
probably, the USA and its puppets (I mean allies...) have no qualms in subverting over nations soverignty if they dont like them.
|
so its the USA's fault if one set of muslims want to blow up another set of muslims...?
btw.. I'd wager that Iran sponsor more terrorism than the US does.
|
Could be but the truth we never know...
Western nations will say those countries for sure support more terrorism...on the other side they will say western nations are supporting more terrorism.. London, Madrid ,09/11. those are no terrorist attacks it is an punishment from Allah...
|
whoaaa. hang on.
Did you just say that all those people murdered in 9/11, July london bombings and in Madrid were killed as an act of God and were not terrorist attrocities?
|
terrorist thought allah's will ws to hve thos ppl killed
|
Garbage and extremely offensive.
Weak minded young men easily influenced by terrororists with a political and economic agenda. Dont be so naive.
|
Most everything has a political and/or ecenomic agenda. But to say that it wasn't also influnced by religious agenda is foolish. They did think they were carrying out Gods will.
Whilst people do terrible acts for many dogmas, religion is terribly effective because it teaches faith, or belief without evidence. Once people are willing to believe things without evidence then they can do most anything. Both tremendously good and hugely terrible.
And jumping to the offensive and garbage argument is just weak. Its not offensive to say that a terrorist that blows himself/herself up in a name of a god had religious motivation. But of course its an over simplification. But certainly not an offensive one.
