By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Mother jailed for sex with son

Xbbjf9s said:
FootballFan said:

Did the boy get arrested for agreeing to participate or did the women force him?

doubt it he is a minor, they most likely put everything on her..as it should be

Hmmm thats slightly ridiculous. He is self contious of his actions. Asuming he isn't a complete retard he should know that having sex with his mother is wrong. At the end of the day she is more in the wrong as she is an elder with more repsonsibility....but he didn't need to recreate the big bang with her....as they say it takes two to tango



Around the Network
FootballFan said:
Xbbjf9s said:
FootballFan said:

Did the boy get arrested for agreeing to participate or did the women force him?

doubt it he is a minor, they most likely put everything on her..as it should be

Hmmm thats slightly ridiculous. He is self contious of his actions. Asuming he isn't a complete retard he should know that having sex with his mother is wrong. At the end of the day she is more in the wrong as she is an elder with more repsonsibility....but he didn't need to recreate the big bang with her....as they say it takes two to tango


i didn't read the whole thing, did he know it was his mom? I'm just assuming he didn't know.

edit- so he did know, well imo 14 is old enough to know right from wrong but like i said i doubt he will get any blame.



Well I guess I'm late for the mother fucker jokes.

I usually have some sort of gripe with that kind of stuff. This whole thing looks like it was consensual, and anyone with a bit of study in philosophy and defending individual freedom should agree that there is a massive hole in the logic of punishment for a victimless crime. Having a kid with your own mother means about 1/4 of chances of genetic issues, so that would be a crime, for sure...

But still... aren't most of we against unallowing people with genetic issues to have children? It would be Nazist and simply crude, huh? How is that any different? Look, I'm not defending any of this, just trying to look beyond the whole issue. I wonder if someone could answer my question with more than "well... it's weird and plain wrong".



 

 

 

 

 

If you think that's sick, feel free to read this. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/7662232/Grandmother-and-grandson-to-have-child-together.html

Seriously tho, what the mother did is very wrong. I can't even imagine it doing it.. urghhhh

But still, we can't be sure that the boy was 100% against that. Unless she threatened him with a knife or something, the boy... still got an erection on his own. If, for example, a fugly chick tried to rape me, I'm sure my dick would look like a frightened turtle and I'd run as soon as she turned her back on me.



haxxiy said:

Well I guess I'm late for the mother fucker jokes.

I usually have some sort of gripe with that kind of stuff. This whole thing looks like it was consensual, and anyone with a bit of study in philosophy and defending individual freedom should agree that there is a massive hole in the logic of punishment for a victimless crime. Having a kid with your own mother means about 1/4 of chances of genetic issues, so that would be a crime, for sure...

But still... aren't most of we against unallowing people with genetic issues to have children? It would be Nazist and simply crude, huh? How is that any different? Look, I'm not defending any of this, just trying to look beyond the whole issue. I wonder if someone could answer my question with more than "well... it's weird and plain wrong".

good question but the only answer i have for you is "it's gross" lol. 



Around the Network
Tuganuno said:

If you think that's sick, feel free to read this. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/7662232/Grandmother-and-grandson-to-have-child-together.html

Seriously tho, what the mother did is very wrong. I can't even imagine it doing it.. urghhhh

But still, we can't be sure that the boy was 100% against that. Unless she threatened him with a knife or something, the boy... still got an erection on his own. If, for example, a fugly chick tried to rape me, I'm sure my dick would look like a frightened turtle and I'd run as soon as she turned her back on me.

didn't read just saw the bolded...not going there man



If they want to F*CK, Let em F*CK.  J/K    :D

 Who was on top?



izaaz101 said:
TheRealMafoo said:

The upside for him, is he should never get pissed off if people call him a mother fucker. it wouldn't be a lie.


Dude got laid at 14 - I don't think he cares!

 

Biologically, and cognitively, this is horrible. I hope they both get counselling and come out all right.

Totally agree.

I think that in cases as violent as these (in psicological terms) its pretty important that institutions take good care of both the victim and the "criminal" (victima and victimario in spanish).



Read this in the paper a few days ago. Despicable.



Xbbjf9s said:
haxxiy said:

Well I guess I'm late for the mother fucker jokes.

I usually have some sort of gripe with that kind of stuff. This whole thing looks like it was consensual, and anyone with a bit of study in philosophy and defending individual freedom should agree that there is a massive hole in the logic of punishment for a victimless crime. Having a kid with your own mother means about 1/4 of chances of genetic issues, so that would be a crime, for sure...

But still... aren't most of we against unallowing people with genetic issues to have children? It would be Nazist and simply crude, huh? How is that any different? Look, I'm not defending any of this, just trying to look beyond the whole issue. I wonder if someone could answer my question with more than "well... it's weird and plain wrong".

good question but the only answer i have for you is "it's gross" lol. 

Even if there are chances of genetics issues, it would still be perfectly possible for 1st degree relatives to procrate, as it happens all the time with cattle, by instance.

The main reason events as this get so much atention is because it makes our cultural beliefs crumble. "Incest" as a moral condenmed act is a cultural creation. The fact that we have a word for that says it all in its own.

If you look it up, in many cultures it was "natural" (and in some still is) that the first sexual relation of people was with their parents, specially for girls. Fuck! I read once that there is even a society whose initiation ritual consisted for young people who wanted to be seen as adults from that day on to make a felatio and swallow what comes out of it to the elders because they thought that masculinity was held in semen (btw: imagine how many porn stars would looks as Arnold Schwarzenegger already).

I mean, if you look all of those things through our "cultural glasses" it makes perfect sense they are perturbing. But if you try and take them out and try to understand how those people see the world, their relations, their beliefs, their  aspirations, you are less impelled to immediately disapprove what they are doing. You don't need the urge to reject it.  You don't feel it is a menace to you at all.

Anyway, returning to subject, I don't know how these two lived it. I'm pretty sure that the fact that she gave him in adoption may have been the main reason she got turned on by his son, and also the main reason why she didn't want to subdue her desire. For the kid, he was confused and happy, a 14 year old hot blooded boy with a hard penis. He may have been so confused that he couldn't rationally control his desire either. But as far as we know, relatives who gave in adoption and later reunite and have sexual relations with each other may be a syndrome, as the grandmother story has this points in common.