By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - JRPG's are dead

AkibaFan said:

he is genralising whole genr on 1 game, tht is th worst thng u cn do in a argument. did u make tis thread for flamebait op? 

If i play oblivion (tht buggy game) and say wrpg's are dead is tht fair?

ff13 can be whatvr it wnts, bt 4 me it was bettr thn all othr games this gen and i hd th most fun.


lol...will you hush.



Around the Network
SmoothCriminal said:

The definition that you're giving is VERY strict and excludes some of the best JRPGs, Fire Emblem for example. Also, last time I checked, Modern Warfare has experience points, and they level you up. How is that not an RPG? The same happens in Counter-Strike, except it doesn't carry over from match to match, which is why i called it a limited RPG. Both of these games have separate battles (in the form of matches) with a specialized system.

 

I'll continue to focus on the definition, thank you very much. If I can't define things by their definition, then classification means nothing.

If I asked for a peanut butter and grape jelly sandwich, and I got a peanut butter and strawberry sandwich, would they be the same? They both share the connotation as PB&J sandwiches, but they are two very different things (especially since strawberry jelly tastes like garbage). 

Modern Warfare is not an RPG because it doesn't have a specialized system for battles. The entire game is one big system for shooting.

Fire Emblem, I don't know much about, but I do think there is a system that allows you to power up according to the enemies you defeat. If not, it's a strategy game.

The definition is strict because that's what RPGs are.

And no, the connotations aren't the same. PBJ has a connotation of peanut butter and jelly. Meanwhile, hate and loathe have the same definition but not connotation. In colloquial English, you can't stick to rigid definitions because it hardly makes sense. Hell, not even proper English can you.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

Xxain said:
AkibaFan said:

he is genralising whole genr on 1 game, tht is th worst thng u cn do in a argument. did u make tis thread for flamebait op? 

If i play oblivion (tht buggy game) and say wrpg's are dead is tht fair?

ff13 can be whatvr it wnts, bt 4 me it was bettr thn all othr games this gen and i hd th most fun.


lol...will you hush.

last time u told me to hush u got banned, so i wudn't do tht again dude.

@lestatdrk

I hve not played daggerfall, played only oblivion. Is a ok game, bt combat is boring nd th story is vry disapointng, so are wrpg's dead? no they r not.



AkibaFan said:
Xxain said:
AkibaFan said:

he is genralising whole genr on 1 game, tht is th worst thng u cn do in a argument. did u make tis thread for flamebait op? 

If i play oblivion (tht buggy game) and say wrpg's are dead is tht fair?

ff13 can be whatvr it wnts, bt 4 me it was bettr thn all othr games this gen and i hd th most fun.


lol...will you hush.

last time u told me to hush u got banned, so i wudn't do tht again dude.

@lestatdrk

I hve not played daggerfall, played only oblivion. Is a ok game, bt combat is boring nd th story is vry disapointng, so are wrpg's dead? no they r not.

While I may not agree with your spelling Akiba. I do agree with what your saying.



AkibaFan said:
Xxain said:
AkibaFan said:

he is genralising whole genr on 1 game, tht is th worst thng u cn do in a argument. did u make tis thread for flamebait op? 

If i play oblivion (tht buggy game) and say wrpg's are dead is tht fair?

ff13 can be whatvr it wnts, bt 4 me it was bettr thn all othr games this gen and i hd th most fun.


lol...will you hush.

last time u told me to hush u got banned, so i wudn't do tht again dude.

@lestatdrk

I hve not played daggerfall, played only oblivion. Is a ok game, bt combat is boring nd th story is vry disapointng, so are wrpg's dead? no they r not.

I was never banned for telling you hush? I believe i was banned for denying you any personal opinioin EDIT: and belittlwing ur intelligenece



Around the Network
dtewi said:
SmoothCriminal said:

The definition that you're giving is VERY strict and excludes some of the best JRPGs, Fire Emblem for example. Also, last time I checked, Modern Warfare has experience points, and they level you up. How is that not an RPG? The same happens in Counter-Strike, except it doesn't carry over from match to match, which is why i called it a limited RPG. Both of these games have separate battles (in the form of matches) with a specialized system.

 

I'll continue to focus on the definition, thank you very much. If I can't define things by their definition, then classification means nothing.

If I asked for a peanut butter and grape jelly sandwich, and I got a peanut butter and strawberry sandwich, would they be the same? They both share the connotation as PB&J sandwiches, but they are two very different things (especially since strawberry jelly tastes like garbage). 

Modern Warfare is not an RPG because it doesn't have a specialized system for battles. The entire game is one big system for shooting.

Fire Emblem, I don't know much about, but I do think there is a system that allows you to power up according to the enemies you defeat. If not, it's a strategy game.

The definition is strict because that's what RPGs are.

And no, the connotations aren't the same. PBJ has a connotation of peanut butter and jelly. Meanwhile, hate and loathe have the same definition but not connotation. In colloquial English, you can't stick to rigid definitions because it hardly makes sense. Hell, not even proper English can you.

Exactly, the entire game is the battle system, the exact same as Fire Emblem, which is considered an RPG (my favorite one at that).

Fire Emblem has a system for leveling up, but it's MUCH more basic than MW2s is. 

 

Also, I admit that my analogy was rather stupid, but it's the closest thing I have. There's not many cases where this kind of thing happens, RPGs are the only one to my knowledge.

 

I fail to see how we can't live by only definitions, that's kinda the POINT of language, isn't it? To give things definitions?



Wagram said:
AkibaFan said:
Xxain said:
AkibaFan said:

he is genralising whole genr on 1 game, tht is th worst thng u cn do in a argument. did u make tis thread for flamebait op? 

If i play oblivion (tht buggy game) and say wrpg's are dead is tht fair?

ff13 can be whatvr it wnts, bt 4 me it was bettr thn all othr games this gen and i hd th most fun.


lol...will you hush.

last time u told me to hush u got banned, so i wudn't do tht again dude.

@lestatdrk

I hve not played daggerfall, played only oblivion. Is a ok game, bt combat is boring nd th story is vry disapointng, so are wrpg's dead? no they r not.

While I may not agree with your spelling Akiba. I do agree with what your saying.

thank u. I dnt understand why ppl can genralise like this and get away with it. Is it fair? Are mods ok with threads like thes?

Can I play nsmb wii, say it hs not evolved and say "Mario is dead". wud tht be allowed? Wud i avoid a ban? Is a bad thing to do and I hve lost repect for the thred creator's post from now on, hw can I take tht persons opinion seriously now if they genralize like this?



SmoothCriminal said:

I fail to see how we can't live by only definitions, that's kinda the POINT of language, isn't it? To give things definitions?

Oh, no no no.

Connotation is the implied meaning, which is what you do everyday.

Definition is the prim and proper meaning.

For example, connotations give differing degrees to similar words.

With only definitions, tiny and small would be the same word.

However, the connotations of the words say that something tiny is smaller than something small.

Understand?



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

AkibaFan said:
Xxain said:
AkibaFan said:

he is genralising whole genr on 1 game, tht is th worst thng u cn do in a argument. did u make tis thread for flamebait op? 

If i play oblivion (tht buggy game) and say wrpg's are dead is tht fair?

ff13 can be whatvr it wnts, bt 4 me it was bettr thn all othr games this gen and i hd th most fun.


lol...will you hush.

last time u told me to hush u got banned, so i wudn't do tht again dude.

@lestatdrk

I hve not played daggerfall, played only oblivion. Is a ok game, bt combat is boring nd th story is vry disapointng, so are wrpg's dead? no they r not.

Oh, I wasn't disagreeing with you about how we shouldn't generalize an entire genre because of one game, because I also think that as well, that's what I said on my first post . I was just pointing out that particular series (Elder Scrolls) of WRPGs are known for being very buggy

I know that it's difficult sometimes to adapt to the very polar differences between both RPG classifications. It reminded me when I started playing Oblivion in 2007. At that same time I was playing SMT: DDS2, so I was juggling between both. The difference between both is staggering, yet, I loved going between both games. Kinda puts the entire genre in perspective



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"

lestatdark said:
AkibaFan said:
Xxain said:
AkibaFan said:

he is genralising whole genr on 1 game, tht is th worst thng u cn do in a argument. did u make tis thread for flamebait op? 

If i play oblivion (tht buggy game) and say wrpg's are dead is tht fair?

ff13 can be whatvr it wnts, bt 4 me it was bettr thn all othr games this gen and i hd th most fun.


lol...will you hush.

last time u told me to hush u got banned, so i wudn't do tht again dude.

@lestatdrk

I hve not played daggerfall, played only oblivion. Is a ok game, bt combat is boring nd th story is vry disapointng, so are wrpg's dead? no they r not.

Oh, I wasn't disagreeing with you about how we shouldn't generalize an entire genre because of one game, because I also think that as well, that's what I said on my first post . I was just pointing out that particular series (Elder Scrolls) of WRPGs are known for being very buggy

I know that it's difficult sometimes to adapt to the very polar differences between both RPG classifications. It reminded me when I started playing Oblivion in 2007. At that same time I was playing SMT: DDS2, so I was juggling between both. The difference between both is staggering, yet, I loved going between both games. Kinda puts the entire genre in perspective

A game that has sold 5.5Million = DEATH OF ALL JRPG!

Damn that amount of sales might as well just be 5 copies!