By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - When I see stuff like this, I'm glad I identify myself as Atheist :P

chocoloco on 17 May 2010

Quotes I was shown by my friend today that make me proud not to be a Christian. Sorry guys I have no online source but.

Miracles and Missions Digest: Jesus Compassion For an Aldulterous Women Dallas, TEXAS

"God will NOT ACCOMODATE any man or women to feed their lust of the flesh to allow hum or her to REMARRY... GOD only put two togethher--no more-- and they become ONE. And NO COURT or CHURCH LAW can amend that LAW! Marriage is NOT A NECESSITY-- God has made man and women so that they can live without sex. We do not expect "an old maid" who never got a chance to marry to have sex from time to time because she is lonesome or "has " to have sex. God says that if she ever did get a chance to marry, she could be put away immediately as soon as her husband discovered she was not a virgin."

This quote seems like it should be from the 1930's yet it comes out of modern day TEXAS, what trash!!!



Around the Network
KingFate on 17 May 2010
chocoloco said:

Quotes I was shown by my friend today that make me proud not to be a Christian. Sorry guys I have no online source but.

Miracles and Missions Digest: Jesus Compassion For an Aldulterous Women Dallas, TEXAS

"God will NOT ACCOMODATE any man or women to feed their lust of the flesh to allow hum or her to REMARRY... GOD only put two togethher--no more-- and they become ONE. And NO COURT or CHURCH LAW can amend that LAW! Marriage is NOT A NECESSITY-- God has made man and women so that they can live without sex. We do not expect "an old maid" who never got a chance to marry to have sex from time to time because she is lonesome or "has " to have sex. God says that if she ever did get a chance to marry, she could be put away immediately as soon as her husband discovered she was not a virgin."

This quote seems like it should be from the 1930's yet it comes out of modern day TEXAS, what trash!!!

I think the people who make those rules need to get laid, then talk about how easy it is to resist the urges.



PSN ID: KingFate_

Akvod on 17 May 2010
dtewi said:
Akvod said:
dtewi said:
Akvod said:
highwaystar101 said:
Oh dear. They're like one of those groups of actors that travel round schools telling students not to do drugs or have underage sex. They try to act cool, but it just doesn't work.

Man, can't find that Family Guy (or was it Simpsons O.o) clip.

The abstience advocate sits with the chair backwards and... bah fuck it... I forgot >.<

Bah, South Park is a much better example.

Meh, that show died seasons of ago. They ironically were the ones that resorted to cheap cash ins of pop culture references and movie parodies, and overly focusing on politics (and poorly, especially with the election period).

I mean, c'mon, the AIDs episode? The Brittny Spears episode? Stopped watching after that season.

I'm pretty sure the anti-smoking episode than any crap Family Guy churned out in the past 8 years, including that abstinence episode.

But see, the difference is that neither Family Guy writers, nor myself, see the show as being the pinacle of comedy as you and MT claim South Park is.

I barely watch Family Guy, but at least I can kill a decent 15 minutes with it, than I can with South Park today. It's a shame, since I used to actually watch that show regularly. Now? Nope.



dtewi on 17 May 2010
Akvod said:

But see, the difference is that neither Family Guy writers, nor myself, see the show as being the pinacle of comedy as you and MT claim South Park is.

I barely watch Family Guy, but at least I can kill a decent 15 minutes with it, than I can with South Park today. It's a shame, since I used to actually watch that show regularly. Now? Nope.

O_o

I'm just saying South Park is better than Family Guy.

Futurama is the pinnacle of comedy and epicness.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

patapon on 17 May 2010

wikiedy wack.



Around the Network
stof on 18 May 2010



Akvod said:

But see, the difference is that neither Family Guy writers, nor myself, see the show as being the pinacle of comedy as you and MT claim South Park is.

I barely watch Family Guy, but at least I can kill a decent 15 minutes with it, than I can with South Park today. It's a shame, since I used to actually watch that show regularly. Now? Nope.

I've never claimed Southpark was the best cartoon, but watch this season's "Medicinal Kentucky Fried Chicken" Episode of South Park. It's freaking hillarious. 
And you don't kill 15 minutes with Family guy, it kills you for 15 minutes. Least funny cartoon on television before American Dad came out.

I'm a mod, come to me if there's mod'n to do. 

Chrizum is the best thing to happen to the internet, Period.

Serves me right for challenging his sales predictions!

Bet with dsisister44: Red Steel 2 will sell 1 million within it's first 365 days of sales.

Seece on 18 May 2010
pizzahut451 said:
Thatmax said:
pizzahut451 said:
when I see threads like this, I'm glad I identify myself as christian

Thats not as clever as you think it is...

well i wasnt trying to be ''clever'' or anything. im glad i am not in one of the most arrogant group of people in the world

Most arrogant groups?



 

Rath on 18 May 2010
pizzahut451 said:
Thatmax said:
pizzahut451 said:
when I see threads like this, I'm glad I identify myself as christian

Thats not as clever as you think it is...

well i wasnt trying to be ''clever'' or anything. im glad i am not in one of the most arrogant group of people in the world

Which group is this? The one that claims to know utterly the absolute meaning of the universe or the one that claims to be almost entirely ignorant?



Sqrl on 18 May 2010
Rath said:
pizzahut451 said:
Thatmax said:
pizzahut451 said:
when I see threads like this, I'm glad I identify myself as christian

Thats not as clever as you think it is...

well i wasnt trying to be ''clever'' or anything. im glad i am not in one of the most arrogant group of people in the world

Which group is this? The one that claims to know utterly the absolute meaning of the universe or the one that claims to be almost entirely ignorant?

@this sort of discussion in general,

I don't know why people get into this.

Both the devoutly religous and the devoutly non-religious have those among them who are arrogantly certain of their beliefs.  Neither has cornered the market on sanctimony or general douchebaggery.

All of which bares it self out every time two or more people get together to try and convince each other that one side or the other is really worse about it than the other.

The bottom line is neither side can be sure their right, and neither side is going to convince the other their wrong.  So really the only reasons left to have the discussion is if you just enjoy arguing about it or if you're interested in theology/philosophy.  I'm all for the later kind of discussion but I can't help but get the sense that this is not exactly where this is headed right now, ya know what I mean?

 

 
To Each Man, Responsibility
KingFate on 18 May 2010
Sqrl said:
Rath said:
pizzahut451 said:
Thatmax said:
pizzahut451 said:
when I see threads like this, I'm glad I identify myself as christian

Thats not as clever as you think it is...

well i wasnt trying to be ''clever'' or anything. im glad i am not in one of the most arrogant group of people in the world

Which group is this? The one that claims to know utterly the absolute meaning of the universe or the one that claims to be almost entirely ignorant?

@this sort of discussion in general,

I don't know why people get into this.

Both the devoutly religous and the devoutly non-religious have those among them who are arrogantly certain of their beliefs.  Neither has cornered the market on sanctimony or general douchebaggery.

All of which bares it self out every time two or more people get together to try and convince each other that one side or the other is really worse about it than the other.

The bottom line is neither side can be sure their right, and neither side is going to convince the other their wrong.  So really the only reasons left to have the discussion is if you just enjoy arguing about it or if you're interested in theology/philosophy.  I'm all for the later kind of discussion but I can't help but get the sense that this is not exactly where this is headed right now, ya know what I mean?

 

 

I agree entirely with the bolded, douchebags come in all flavors . Also, I don't think this is going to end well either tbh.



PSN ID: KingFate_