By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Can Bungie Surpass God Of War 3 Using PS3? Sources Say _____

 

Can Bungie Surpass God Of War 3 Using PS3? Sources Say _____

bungie is going to pass it and then some 29 10.51%
 
its going to be close 13 4.71%
 
it could go both ways 31 11.23%
 
not even close gow3 is still the best 107 38.77%
 
its way to early to tell 96 34.78%
 
Total:276
slowmo on 04 May 2010
FF_Fanatic said:
slowmo said:
FF_Fanatic said:
ROFL I will beleive it when I see it, the last bungie (non MS one) I played was Oni, that was a brilliant game, as to whether they can pass GOW III, I Seiously doubt it since they are multiplatform, because not everything will be ps3 dedicated, therefore comporimises will be have to be made to allow for a x360 version

 

Yeah right, for every FFXIII there is a Bayonetta and Ghostbusters to show the PS3 has held the 360 back too.  The strengths of the two consoles are very different so compromises are made on both sides. 

doesn't change the fact that GOW III is still the most impressive game to hit consoles, nothing on my x360 can stand up to that and yes I own ps3 and x360, and we all know experienced the developers was on bayonetta or ghostbusters, the SE developers however are very experienced and are well known for pushing hardware and we all know what happened on FF XIII.

Thanks for confirming my suspicions, another user to add to the ignore list. 



Around the Network
Boberman on 04 May 2010

No, since they will make a multi plat game, make it for the 360 and port it to the PS3. As well they are not a 1st party studio trying to sell the PS3 unlike Santa Monica, or Naughty Dog who is given more time to perfect a product to sell the system.



FF_Fanatic on 04 May 2010
slowmo said:
FF_Fanatic said:
slowmo said:
FF_Fanatic said:
ROFL I will beleive it when I see it, the last bungie (non MS one) I played was Oni, that was a brilliant game, as to whether they can pass GOW III, I Seiously doubt it since they are multiplatform, because not everything will be ps3 dedicated, therefore comporimises will be have to be made to allow for a x360 version

 

Yeah right, for every FFXIII there is a Bayonetta and Ghostbusters to show the PS3 has held the 360 back too.  The strengths of the two consoles are very different so compromises are made on both sides. 

doesn't change the fact that GOW III is still the most impressive game to hit consoles, nothing on my x360 can stand up to that and yes I own ps3 and x360, and we all know experienced the developers was on bayonetta or ghostbusters, the SE developers however are very experienced and are well known for pushing hardware and we all know what happened on FF XIII.

Thanks for confirming my suspicions, another user to add to the ignore list. 

lol carry on being in denial, ps users was happy to admit xbox had the stronger hardware(ps2 days), it's so funny how xfans are all in denial that ps3 is more powerful, and alan wake is evidence of that it was a game made specifically for x360 and it did not even get anywhere near uncharted 1 never mind anything else, so carry on your stupid ignores, plug your ears and pray x360 survives bungie going multi



xxmob on 04 May 2010
FF_Fanatic said:

lol carry on being in denial, ps users was happy to admit xbox had the stronger hardware(ps2 days), it's so funny how xfans are all in denial that ps3 is more powerful, and alan wake is evidence of that it was a game made specifically for x360 and it did not even get anywhere near uncharted 1 never mind anything else, so carry on your stupid ignores, plug your ears and pray x360 survives bungie going multi

im an xbox fan and i have no problem telling people the ps3 hardware is better, and i also dont know what you mean when you say Alan wake didnt even surpass uncharted 1, the uncharted 1 that i played had major graphic pop ins and it didnt really look all that good to me when everything was clay (and for the fact that Alan Wake isn't out yet) haha.

I also dont see why the x360 is going to die from bungie going multiplat, I mean the 360 still gets bungie games its just not exclusive to the 360 any more, if your a gammer it shouldn't matter wich system the game is on, but it should matter on the game quality itself.




FF_Fanatic on 05 May 2010
xxmob said:
FF_Fanatic said:

lol carry on being in denial, ps users was happy to admit xbox had the stronger hardware(ps2 days), it's so funny how xfans are all in denial that ps3 is more powerful, and alan wake is evidence of that it was a game made specifically for x360 and it did not even get anywhere near uncharted 1 never mind anything else, so carry on your stupid ignores, plug your ears and pray x360 survives bungie going multi

im an xbox fan and i have no problem telling people the ps3 hardware is better, and i also dont know what you mean when you say Alan wake didnt even surpass uncharted 1, the uncharted 1 that i played had major graphic pop ins and it didnt really look all that good to me when everything was clay (and for the fact that Alan Wake isn't out yet) haha.

I also dont see why the x360 is going to die from bungie going multiplat, I mean the 360 still gets bungie games its just not exclusive to the 360 any more, if your a gammer it shouldn't matter wich system the game is on, but it should matter on the game quality itself.

uncharted 1 did not have massive graphic pop in lol, you never played on it, i never had one issue with it, and neither has any of my friends...

also i am not a fan of any system i just hate it when people think they know what they are going on about and try and spin it.



Around the Network
Bullet100000 on 05 May 2010
freebs2 said:
lol like bungie is an hardwere-pushing developer..... Halo in terms of graphics has never been that great.

^^^

That.

 

Maybe Reach will change all that but only time will tell.  Bungie makes games with great gameplay but they never push the hardware to its limits.



*Al Bundy's My Hero*

 

*Al Bundy For President*

Waiting On GT7!!!

 PSN ID: Acidfacekiller

xxmob on 05 May 2010
FF_Fanatic said:
xxmob said:
FF_Fanatic said:

lol carry on being in denial, ps users was happy to admit xbox had the stronger hardware(ps2 days), it's so funny how xfans are all in denial that ps3 is more powerful, and alan wake is evidence of that it was a game made specifically for x360 and it did not even get anywhere near uncharted 1 never mind anything else, so carry on your stupid ignores, plug your ears and pray x360 survives bungie going multi

im an xbox fan and i have no problem telling people the ps3 hardware is better, and i also dont know what you mean when you say Alan wake didnt even surpass uncharted 1, the uncharted 1 that i played had major graphic pop ins and it didnt really look all that good to me when everything was clay (and for the fact that Alan Wake isn't out yet) haha.

I also dont see why the x360 is going to die from bungie going multiplat, I mean the 360 still gets bungie games its just not exclusive to the 360 any more, if your a gammer it shouldn't matter wich system the game is on, but it should matter on the game quality itself.

uncharted 1 did not have massive graphic pop in lol, you never played on it, i never had one issue with it, and neither has any of my friends...

also i am not a fan of any system i just hate it when people think they know what they are going on about and try and spin it.

really because at the begging of the game were you find the uboat in the amazon yeah it was all turned to clay, until the cutscene when your friend gets shoot (everything just popped in), when you just brook out of prison with the camera girl and were driving away, yeah there were some parts in the chase were the trees would turn in to clay, every other thing was very miner like rocks that wouldn't pop in when you first looked at them and little this like that.

say what you want but when i played the game there were graphical pop ins




xxmob on 05 May 2010

ign http://ps3.ign.com/articles/834/834931p2.html

9.0 Graphics
There's no doubt the game looks great and that the use of in-game assets for the movies is seamless transition, but there's still a fair amount of screen tearing and texture pop in

and yeah if you still dont think ive played the game then go cheek out my account since my psn name is there

sorry i just dont like when people accuse me of not doing something when i have.... even if its about a game haha




slowmo on 05 May 2010
xxmob said:
FF_Fanatic said:
xxmob said:
FF_Fanatic said:

lol carry on being in denial, ps users was happy to admit xbox had the stronger hardware(ps2 days), it's so funny how xfans are all in denial that ps3 is more powerful, and alan wake is evidence of that it was a game made specifically for x360 and it did not even get anywhere near uncharted 1 never mind anything else, so carry on your stupid ignores, plug your ears and pray x360 survives bungie going multi

im an xbox fan and i have no problem telling people the ps3 hardware is better, and i also dont know what you mean when you say Alan wake didnt even surpass uncharted 1, the uncharted 1 that i played had major graphic pop ins and it didnt really look all that good to me when everything was clay (and for the fact that Alan Wake isn't out yet) haha.

I also dont see why the x360 is going to die from bungie going multiplat, I mean the 360 still gets bungie games its just not exclusive to the 360 any more, if your a gammer it shouldn't matter wich system the game is on, but it should matter on the game quality itself.

uncharted 1 did not have massive graphic pop in lol, you never played on it, i never had one issue with it, and neither has any of my friends...

also i am not a fan of any system i just hate it when people think they know what they are going on about and try and spin it.

really because at the begging of the game were you find the uboat in the amazon yeah it was all turned to clay, until the cutscene when your friend gets shoot (everything just popped in), when you just brook out of prison with the camera girl and were driving away, yeah there were some parts in the chase were the trees would turn in to clay, every other thing was very miner like rocks that wouldn't pop in when you first looked at them and little this like that.

say what you want but when i played the game there were graphical pop ins

 

For a guy that is not a fan of any system he sure does hate the 360 and post an awful lot of bullshit Playstation propoganda.  Just to clarify his people thinking what they know they are going on about, allow me to help you disprove his bullshit claims that there is no pop in on Uncharted.

 

http://www.ztgamedomain.com/5199/Uncharted-Drakes-Fortune.html

Notice in the Cons "- Some Minor Graphical Issues (Pop-in/Screen Tearing)"

http://uk.ps3.ign.com/articles/834/834931p2.html

The graphics summary "There's no doubt the game looks great and that the use of in-game assets for the movies is seamless transition, but there's still a fair amount of screen tearing and texture pop in."

http://www.vgchartz.com/games/gamereviewdisp.php?id=12778&reviewid=750

From a pro PS3 poster on this very site "The graphics shine like no other, with minor pop-in issues."

http://playstationlifestyle.net/2008/08/20/greatest-hits-official-uncharted-drakes-fortune-review/

"There is still a fair amount of texture pop-in and screen tearing throughout the game. It’s a very minor problem"

 

I could go on and on but the point is proven that if the guy cannot even understand what texture pop in is then he is hardly able to make any comment on graphical fidelity given how little he knows on the subject.