This seems to be a good match up so lets hear the debates people!

P.s.

Be fair in your argument, popularity has nothing to do with this fight so no bringing up sales and what not.

My argument is that Nathan eeks out the win (thanks to his Chimeran powers)

Strength-wise they are probably pretty close, keep in mind Master Chief is also genitically modified, however the Chief has the super-suit, so a win for him.

I dunno, remember at the end of r2 hale can blow sh*t up with a flick of his wrists

Hmm. Well IMO the Chimera are WAY cooler than the Covenant. So if Hale can take those big bastards out then.

Hale > Master Chief

I'm not sure they are even remotely close in strength. Does Nathan Hale have unbreakable bones? Is he able to toss 20 ton tanks? Is he trained in CQC and does he have superhuman speed and reflexes?

Even if the MC was butt naked without his armor I think he would stomp over Hale without a problem.

Power-wise, Master Chief wins, I mean... I don't even need to elaborate.

Drake is the better character, I mean... I don't even need to elaborate.

He said Hale, not Drake.    Yes I first thought of Uncharted's Drake as well but then I read the OP and realized he said Hale.

Ah, I guess I should have prefaced my statement with "I have only played R:FOM so far", so what you're talking about could make a difference. I loved R:FOM, definitely my favorite shooter on the PS3. And Halo 3 is my favorite 360 shooter, so this was kinda tough for me.

Wrong nathan man, I'm talking about resistance nathan

I thought Uncharted 2 was your favorite PS3 shooter?!

PS - I've been playing UC2 online a ton and it is crazy good.  Why have you not been online to play some?