| BoneArk said: I think Sony + Nintendo would be a better collaboration than Microsoft imo. |
We all saw how that turned out last time...
| BoneArk said: I think Sony + Nintendo would be a better collaboration than Microsoft imo. |
We all saw how that turned out last time...
Sony + MSFT should come together and take down Nintendo. :D
Will never happen, but I would love to see the death of that plumber.
| Squilliam said: The reason why I say this is because it appears that both will be better able to meet their goals working together than they will working seperately. Microsoft isn't averse to working with other competitors, even in the same industry so cue Apple if you want and Microsoft perfectly matches Nintendo in terms of shoring up their weaknesses in networking, development environment and they would both benefit from having similar hardware and that hardware can be produced cheaper with better economies of scale for both parties. |
Did you think of this while you were high?
I dont think its beneficial for nintendo. there are a lot of costs to consider, not just the IP, there are initial investments and long term maintenance costs, and nintendo doesn't have to go to microsoft, some technologies used by in xbox live might not have been their own technology, purchasing usage rights are common on techno firms considering high R&D costs. and nintendo has a differentiation strategy, they'd rather avoid a competitive market by producing unique products that are not present in the market, considering the console industry requires high initial investments and requires long development time for a product to be feasible, competitors would not have enough time to copy their tech.
and most nintendo users really don't care about online gaming.
I wouldn't see Nintendo working with Microsoft or Apple. With both of them having their foot in the gaming world, they might consider their Intellectual Properties at risk.
Google is too obvious, but I doubt it will happen. I think Google has ambitions towards an Android-compatible gaming system on the way, to follow Apple's iPhone.
Maybe they could try a large internet company that does not seem close to entering the gaming market (Yahoo?) or perhaps something like Steam, not owned by direct competition?
This is assuming Nintendo wants an XBox Live style online system. Those systems are popular among Halo players who like to shout racial slurs 24/7, but the super-hardcore is staying away from the Wii. Nintendo isn't going to spend millions of dollars to appeal to people who don't even buy their system or games.
Wii has more 20 million sellers than PS3 has 5 million sellers.
Acolyte of Disruption
| Showertea said: This is assuming Nintendo wants an XBox Live style online system. Those systems are popular among Halo players who like to shout racial slurs 24/7, but the super-hardcore is staying away from the Wii. Nintendo isn't going to spend millions of dollars to appeal to people who don't even buy their system or games. |
If they thought like that, would we even have the Wii?
Nintendo has always been a fairly stubborn company. That isn't a bad characteristic by any means, but I seriously doubt they'd ever work with a direct competitor under any circumstances.

Atto Suggests...:
Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series
Game - Metro Last Light
TV - Deadwood
Music - Forest Swords
| Squilliam said: The reason why I say this is because it appears that both will be better able to meet their goals working together than they will working seperately. Microsoft isn't averse to working with other competitors, even in the same industry so cue Apple if you want and Microsoft perfectly matches Nintendo in terms of shoring up their weaknesses in networking, development environment and they would both benefit from having similar hardware and that hardware can be produced cheaper with better economies of scale for both parties. Advantages Nintendo:
Advantages Microsoft:
|
The oh-so-subtle subtext here is MS fans should cooperate with Nintendo fans against annoying Sony fans, or at least that's the only explanation I can come up with for this that makes sense; I would be hard pressed to come up with two other companies with less compatible corporate cultures and unaligned interests.
So Nintendo should want to be acquired by MS so they can integrate MS's realtime bleeping tech? Seriously? You're a better Sophist than that Squilliam. I would suggest advocating the merging of Nintendo with a codeword substitute for MS in the form of some notoriously pro-microsoft proxy, such as valve. It would have the advantage of being less obvious, and might even make sense as long as you didn't think about it for too long.