i thought IGn was bias towards the ps3, it gave more AAA ratings for ps3 exclusives than xbox 360 exclusive, plus MGS4 is a ps3 exclusive which got 10/10 from ign, i dont think there is an xbox 360 exlcuisve game that got a 10/10, so i disagree

XBL has IGN Strategize with Jessica Chobot. Yup, I just jizzed thinking about it.

teh real irony there imo....... now if only developers knew

Nah that's just laziness.

If you look at Just Cause 2 the PS3 version is once again the definitive version because it includes the youtube recording feature, for me that's the selling point of the game, and as a reviewer that'd earn it at least another 10 in the 10/100 scale.

However IGN gave both the 360 and PS3 versions 8.8. Which is a fine score, but isn't exactly doing the PS3 version justice.

They are bias in one respect though. I believe IGN do exclusive content for the 360, which is distributed directly onto the 360. Last I went on my 360 that's what I remember, they dispensed game tips and other crap. Odd these aren't also on PS3, I'd guess Microsoft pays for them? 

Agreed with lurker, so what if the pS3 version of FF has better graphics and still don't get its credits?
The Ps3 still has more exclusive titles with high scores, so don't take it on IGN

IGN isn't biased, they simply love shooters. Makes perfect sense.
In fact, it even explains why Bayonetta (somehow) got a better score than GoW3 :p /JOKE

No I didn't play Halo ODST.  IGN reviewed it and said it was "more of the same stuff" which is good...

But when Ratchet and Clank:Quest for Booty was reviewed it was "more of the same stuff" which to them was bad.