Meh, looks no better then GOw 3, and crtek releases pics thatare not ameplay that look betetr then the actual game they did it with Crysis on PC, for all we know they it could be runnign at 1 FPS, its just a screen shot.

first game was boring as well.

This is for a hundred percent the PC version. If u can't tell that from just looking at the screenshots u are probably blind.

Oh and IGN just dragged those Screenshots into the XBox360 section.

I mean they are also in the PC Section. PC Screenshots.

http://uk.media.pc.ign.com/media/143/14354294/imgs_1.html

Did you read the first look article. 1FPS comment suggests no.

http://www.gamesthirst.com/2010/02/10/new-crysis-2-ps3-scans-best-looking-console-game-ever/

HUH? Ps3 was the first version shown in february.

Crytek always release nicer looking screens then the actual game I played crysis on PC, and saw it first hand. Thats a  fact. its easy to make screens look good, doesnt look any betetr then GOw 3 and a bit worse then crysis oN PC.

Don't worry. Selnor is confused. He thinks PC Screenshots with graphics that will probably eat more then 4GB Ram are from XBox 360.

Chances are those are PC pics like they do with many games and paste them into the Ps3 and 360 sites. its called marketing.

Thats not the PS3 version. It's already been shown in these forums that the 360 version has been used to show PS3 and PC media. Why, I dont know. But no PC media has even seen the Crysis 2 on PC. And you would have thought so.

its the PS3 version, its from the PS3 magazine, LMAo, I suggest you read please. Also, crytek have stated it will run identical on both with the PS3 runnign a little better, Crysis is very physics heavy.

Those are totally not console screenshots.