By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Gamersyde: Alan Wake technically at the front, 360 and PS3. Preview.

Alan Wake is a linear game with small scale fights, compare that to a game with the epic scale and chaos going on yeah like GOW 3. Many games are up to Alan Wakes graphics, and better, UC2, God of War 3, KZ2, Crys s(Plus many other Pc game obviously)  Even mass Effect 2 is one of the 360's best, Gears of War. etc..  Whoever said Sand box game needs to do some research. Not one toehr site has made any bold claims about AW graphics, every site is saying GOW 3 is the best ever for any console.



Around the Network

Cool, Alan Wake looks pretty darn good, glad to see its comparative to Uncharted 2 since that blew my mind visually. I hope and feel God of War will usher in a new benchmark, but its good that Alan Wake, which is in a genre in which graphics and mood play an important role in setting the tone of the game and immersiveness (sp?) of the environment, is up to the benchmark thus far with currently released games on the PS3 or any console for that matter.



CGI-Quality said:
RAZurrection said:
mastorofpuppetz said:
How does Crysis 2 make 360 leap frog PS3 (LMAo), when it will also be on PS3 and at least equal

The fact you using the term "at least" is an oxymoron in itself, since most multiplatform games lesser than Crysis 2 are just not as good on PS3 as they are 360, sometimes its major, sometimes it's minor and in maybe 1% of cases they are in fact indistinguishabe or even better on PS3, but for the significant majority, the PS3 version is in fact "less".


Right now PS3 has the best visuals, deal with it, not like the 360 is ugly, dont be so sensitive.

Maybe, but it long term it looks like 360 is pulling ahead thanks to Crysis 2.

lol....but how when this very game will also be on the PS3?


someone has been countered nicely by the PS team lol



Time to Work !

RAZurrection said:
mastorofpuppetz said:
How does Crysis 2 make 360 leap frog PS3 (LMAo), when it will also be on PS3 and at least equal

The fact you using the term "at least" is an oxymoron in itself, since most multiplatform games lesser than Crysis 2 are just not as good on PS3 as they are 360, sometimes its major, sometimes it's minor and in maybe 1% of cases they are in fact indistinguishabe or even better on PS3, but for the significant majority, the PS3 version is in fact "less".


Right now PS3 has the best visuals, deal with it, not like the 360 is ugly, dont be so sensitive.

Maybe, but it long term it looks like 360 is pulling ahead thanks to Crysis 2.

What? Explain how when it is on both and the DEVELOPERS said it will run a little better on PS3? Your saying they arelying?  Give mea  break, whats next weeks lotto numbers? The 360 cannot surpass the PS3, it does not have the hardware. At best they will always remain close. Fanboys are so pathetic.  Again, its on both, will at worse lookthe same. name one multi-pkat game that loked a lot better on one the the other? It's multi=-plat for a reason, they will make both to be the same, with PS3 having slightly better visuals due to Cells ability to handle physics.

 

As the PS3 gets older the gap will actually widen as devs get betetr with Cell, as we have seen this gen already. Please, you have zero facts, just some MYTH that despite crytek refutting you that somehoe a game thats on both will make 360 leap frog the PS3, pretty dillusional.



newfgamer said:
RAZurrection said:
mastorofpuppetz said:
How does Crysis 2 make 360 leap frog PS3 (LMAo), when it will also be on PS3 and at least equal

The fact you using the term "at least" is an oxymoron in itself, since most multiplatform games lesser than Crysis 2 are just not as good on PS3 as they are 360, sometimes its major, sometimes it's minor and in maybe 1% of cases they are in fact indistinguishabe or even better on PS3, but for the significant majority, the PS3 version is in fact "less".


Right now PS3 has the best visuals, deal with it, not like the 360 is ugly, dont be so sensitive.

Maybe, but it long term it looks like 360 is pulling ahead thanks to Crysis 2.

What? Explain how when it is on both and the DEVELOPERS said it will run a little better on PS3? Your saying they arelying?  Give mea  break, whats next weeks lotto numbers? The 360 cannot surpass the PS3, it does not have the hardware. At best they will always remain close. Fanboys are so pathetic.  Again, its on both, will at worse lookthe same. name one multi-pkat game that loked a lot better on one the the other? It's multi=-plat for a reason, they will make both to be the same, with PS3 having slightly better visuals due to Cells ability to handle physics.

I'll name 2:

 

Bayonetta (in favor of 360).

 

FFXIII (in favor of PS3).

 

Both are examples of sloppy ports, since they were both in development exclusively for one console.

 

I don't agree with him about Crysis 2 at all, though. Until we see it run on both consoles and have DF do an analysis, there is little water to his claims.



Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!

Kojima: Come out with Project S already!

Around the Network
huaxiong90 said:
newfgamer said:
RAZurrection said:
mastorofpuppetz said:
How does Crysis 2 make 360 leap frog PS3 (LMAo), when it will also be on PS3 and at least equal

The fact you using the term "at least" is an oxymoron in itself, since most multiplatform games lesser than Crysis 2 are just not as good on PS3 as they are 360, sometimes its major, sometimes it's minor and in maybe 1% of cases they are in fact indistinguishabe or even better on PS3, but for the significant majority, the PS3 version is in fact "less".


Right now PS3 has the best visuals, deal with it, not like the 360 is ugly, dont be so sensitive.

Maybe, but it long term it looks like 360 is pulling ahead thanks to Crysis 2.

What? Explain how when it is on both and the DEVELOPERS said it will run a little better on PS3? Your saying they arelying?  Give mea  break, whats next weeks lotto numbers? The 360 cannot surpass the PS3, it does not have the hardware. At best they will always remain close. Fanboys are so pathetic.  Again, its on both, will at worse lookthe same. name one multi-pkat game that loked a lot better on one the the other? It's multi=-plat for a reason, they will make both to be the same, with PS3 having slightly better visuals due to Cells ability to handle physics.

I'll name 2:

 

Bayonetta (in favor of 360).

 

FFXIII (in favor of PS3).

 

 

HUH? , those are SMALL differences, Not enough to leapfrog a console graphically this gen, also, bayonetyta never looked nay better, its issues were performance which were patched. He's talking like the 360 version will be a lot better, depite the devs themselves saying toherwise.

 



newfgamer said:
huaxiong90 said:
newfgamer said:
RAZurrection said:
mastorofpuppetz said:
How does Crysis 2 make 360 leap frog PS3 (LMAo), when it will also be on PS3 and at least equal

The fact you using the term "at least" is an oxymoron in itself, since most multiplatform games lesser than Crysis 2 are just not as good on PS3 as they are 360, sometimes its major, sometimes it's minor and in maybe 1% of cases they are in fact indistinguishabe or even better on PS3, but for the significant majority, the PS3 version is in fact "less".


Right now PS3 has the best visuals, deal with it, not like the 360 is ugly, dont be so sensitive.

Maybe, but it long term it looks like 360 is pulling ahead thanks to Crysis 2.

What? Explain how when it is on both and the DEVELOPERS said it will run a little better on PS3? Your saying they arelying?  Give mea  break, whats next weeks lotto numbers? The 360 cannot surpass the PS3, it does not have the hardware. At best they will always remain close. Fanboys are so pathetic.  Again, its on both, will at worse lookthe same. name one multi-pkat game that loked a lot better on one the the other? It's multi=-plat for a reason, they will make both to be the same, with PS3 having slightly better visuals due to Cells ability to handle physics.

I'll name 2:

 

Bayonetta (in favor of 360).

 

FFXIII (in favor of PS3).

 

 

HUH? , those are SMALL differences, Not enough to leapfrog a console graphically this gen, also, bayonetyta never looked nay better, its issues were performance which were patched. He's talking like the 360 version will be a lot better, depite the devs themselves saying toherwise.

 

I edited my post. Read the last paragraph.



Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!

Kojima: Come out with Project S already!

CGI-Quality said:
newfgamer said:
RAZurrection said:
mastorofpuppetz said:
How does Crysis 2 make 360 leap frog PS3 (LMAo), when it will also be on PS3 and at least equal

The fact you using the term "at least" is an oxymoron in itself, since most multiplatform games lesser than Crysis 2 are just not as good on PS3 as they are 360, sometimes its major, sometimes it's minor and in maybe 1% of cases they are in fact indistinguishabe or even better on PS3, but for the significant majority, the PS3 version is in fact "less".


Right now PS3 has the best visuals, deal with it, not like the 360 is ugly, dont be so sensitive.

Maybe, but it long term it looks like 360 is pulling ahead thanks to Crysis 2.

What? Explain how when it is on both and the DEVELOPERS said it will run a little better on PS3? Your saying they arelying?  Give mea  break, whats next weeks lotto numbers? The 360 cannot surpass the PS3, it does not have the hardware. At best they will always remain close. Fanboys are so pathetic.  Again, its on both, will at worse lookthe same. name one multi-pkat game that loked a lot better on one the the other? It's multi=-plat for a reason, they will make both to be the same, with PS3 having slightly better visuals due to Cells ability to handle physics.

Actually, Splinter Cell Double Agent looked horrific on PS3. But there have been opposite situations, such as Wanted: Weapons of Fate, though in this argument, because of the 360 as lead console most of the time, it handily beats the PS3 in ratio of what console has the better performing multiplats.

Once again, those were early in the PS3's life cycle, them differences between multi-plats were very minimal, not Gen definign differences in graphics like RAZ likes to BS about. Now almost all look identical.


CRYTEK stated PS3 will be slightly better, until he can prove the devs are wrong, you get the drift.



CGI-Quality said:
newfgamer said:
RAZurrection said:
mastorofpuppetz said:
How does Crysis 2 make 360 leap frog PS3 (LMAo), when it will also be on PS3 and at least equal

The fact you using the term "at least" is an oxymoron in itself, since most multiplatform games lesser than Crysis 2 are just not as good on PS3 as they are 360, sometimes its major, sometimes it's minor and in maybe 1% of cases they are in fact indistinguishabe or even better on PS3, but for the significant majority, the PS3 version is in fact "less".


Right now PS3 has the best visuals, deal with it, not like the 360 is ugly, dont be so sensitive.

Maybe, but it long term it looks like 360 is pulling ahead thanks to Crysis 2.

What? Explain how when it is on both and the DEVELOPERS said it will run a little better on PS3? Your saying they arelying?  Give mea  break, whats next weeks lotto numbers? The 360 cannot surpass the PS3, it does not have the hardware. At best they will always remain close. Fanboys are so pathetic.  Again, its on both, will at worse lookthe same. name one multi-pkat game that loked a lot better on one the the other? It's multi=-plat for a reason, they will make both to be the same, with PS3 having slightly better visuals due to Cells ability to handle physics.

Actually, Splinter Cell Double Agent looked horrific on PS3. But there have been opposite situations, such as Wanted: Weapons of Fate, though in this argument, because of the 360 as lead console most of the time, it handily beats the PS3 in ratio of what console has the better performing multiplats.

This. The 360 is holding back the games of this gen. The PS3 is capable of so much (look exclusives) and yet the 360 is the leading console for some reasons but mainly because of installed base (and some moneyhatting here and there). Thank God for Sony and their vision, thanks for universal HDD and Blu-ray support, thanks Sony for your investment in first-party talent, so I can enjoy stuff like God of War 3, Uncharted 2 and Gran Turismo. I gotta praise much Sony developers, don't you think they would've been well off if they had decided to make some subpar sequels for games like God of War, Uncharted or Gran Turismo? But no, these guys push it to the limit and beyond. Play B3yond!

OT: Alan Wake (imho) doesn't justify 5 years of development (a mid-2010 release) with the visuals and physics it's showing. It's not going to break any ground in gameplay, dramatic presentation and techinically it will be nominated for lighting effects but I don't see this game as anything but another action-thriller in the Silent Hill-style. Hopefully, it's a good game and it helps to revive the genre.



newfgamer said:

What? Explain how when it is on both and the DEVELOPERS said it will run a little better on PS3?

It would run better on PS3 in context that it was a particle heavy game (physics, which don't show up in a screenshot), it runs better on 360 if it's a shader heavy game (graphics, which do). Cavet confirmed they wanted to make Crysis 2 the most shader heavy game ever.

newfgamer said:

Your saying they arelying? 

More likely that you are.

newfgamer said:

At best they will always remain close.

Perhaps, the PS3 does have some nice looking exclusives, but Microsofts been running rings around them this gen technically. Every major engine runs better on on the older console, UE3, Frostbite, Capcom Frameworks 1 & 2, Ego, Tech 4, Tech 5, Cryengine 3, Scimitar. 

The only games that seem to run better on PS3 are those that never turn up anywhere else...and Crystal tools.

newfgamer said:

its multi=-plat for a reason, they will make both to be the same, with PS3 having slightly better visuals due to Cells ability to handle physics.

Yeah money, if every developer only made a multiplatform game that could be replicated with complete uncompromise, the 360 would have another 700 exclusives.

newfgamer said:

As the PS3 gets older the gap will actually widen as devs get betetr with Cell,

Whatever you say slick, that doesn't really explain why the 360s leapfrogging the PS3 though.

newfgamer said:

name one multi-pkat game that loked a lot better on one the the other?

Heh. Who says it has to look a lot better. The PS3 is 1 year younger, has the blu-ray and a standard hard drive. You tell me what an acceptable level of downgrade is for newer hardware.