By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Teletext : Heavy Rain Review (Abysmal)

Linkasf said:
Well... After watching a friend play Fahrenheit and Heavy Rain... Barely anything has changed. It does feel one dimensional, boring, and uncreative. Hell i dont consider this "game" nor the other one a game.

Your from UAE? You know Heavy Rain was ban there. It means that your friend imported it and received it the same day, and you had enough time to tried it. Can you show me how to make my own teleporter too?



Around the Network
d21lewis said:
All I can say is that I just "played" through the most intense and scary video game moment in my entire gaming career thanks to Heavy Rain. There wasn't a single zombie, demon, or metroid to be found. Heavy Rain may not be for everybody but for me, this game is the truth. I doubt I'm even 20% done with the game, yet.


Did your PS3 suffer a temporary YLOD?



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

In my opinion, they rated inFamous too high, and this too low. That said, it's all in the play experience.... I have found some of Heavy Rain's graphics really off-putting, since you'll see amazingly detailed stuff and completely bland polygons on screen at once (Ethan tucking in Sean.... what was that, an 8-bit blanket? Or had the boy cut strange angles into the top?). Other games with minor graphical pop-up or anti-aliasing here or there you might overlook, but when you can see the pores on someone's face, then the edge of their door looks like a serated knife while it's moving, it is jarring. The game also froze during load screens twice for me... The voice acting is similar, where some performances are top notch, and some (the children especially) are horrible to the point of distraction, all the worse for being in the same scene with the better actors... despite this, I sunk hours into it today, found it incredibly engaging and enjoyable. I'd give it an eight out of ten.

inFamous, on the other hand, I have never been able to play for more than 15 minutes without it glitching or crashing, I found it repetitive and derivative (generic hero with a couple powers from Force Unleashed dropped into one of the Spider-Man movie games), and when the "big reveal" was spoiled for me, I have to admit I thought it was one of the stupidest stories I've ever heard for a game. My wife, however, never once had an issue with the game that didn't immediately rectify itself (she was dragged cross town by a car she inexplicably tried to cover behind... or rather, Cole did.... and she had some enemies get caught in the environment. Compare this to me falling through a building or getting stuck in teh sidewalk, or suddenly having all the police shoot at me because I saved one of them....) Our scores for the game would differ drastically.

If they looked at Heavy Rain as just an interactive animated movie, then the lack of polish in the acting, the "uncanny divide" that makes some scenes so off-putting, and the stiff animation (the way Ethan walks or page "cleans her face" look especially broken when performed by something so freakishly lifelike) would really hurt the score just like they would if this had been a theatrical release. 4 out of 10 seems REALLY harsh, but it's not indefensible any more so than their other scores.



kowenicki said:
aragod said:
kowenicki said:
okr said:
Ah, another "praise/kill the review site depending on score" thread. This time it's pitchfork time.

Of all the many hypes we already saw this gen on all consoles, the one which emerged around Heavy Rain during the last few weeks feels like the strangest and most faked one to me. Quick time hype, so to speak.

emporers new clothes...?

I'm getting Heavy Rain and will play it through... but I think there is a strange elite attitude surrounding the game

It is almost as though it is impossible to criticise the game because Heavy Rain is somehow arty and high brow and that means it shouldnt be criticised because the developers have been brave.

It's ok to criticize it, but with fair and honest critic. I can take EDGE score, but I can't take this teletext crap. Have you read the review? If it's fair by you, why the hell would you want to get that game? Are you masochist?


Because I formulate my own opinions... ONE bad written review doesnt shape my opinion.   Why cant people just ignore it as an oddity... this constant bleating about the odd low review is just childish.

The same reason you cant ignore the thread where people want to talk about it.

For as much as you go on about opinions youre quick to take the time to enter a thread you seem to not care about and argue with people interested in the topic and trying to express their OPINIONS on it rather than just letting the thread door hit your ass on the way out and letting people discuss the topic at hand without having to explain to you why they want to.

Now, on topic. That said as has been pointed out already this is, what, 30 points lower than any review theyve done in the past? They must have hated it but they dont have a history of doing anything crazy so it must just have not done anything for them.



maximus22 said:
4/10... Seriously?!... 4/10?!
Even if you don't like the game at all, I can't think of any reason why this landmark game could possibly deserve this score. Sounds like a bonehead review to me.

Maybe the reviewer wants to play a videogame and not watch a movie and every once in awhile push a button.

 



Around the Network
binary solo said:
It's reviews like this that makes taking the median review score a better review indicator than the mean review score for Metacritic.

For most games the median and mean review scores are the same or within .05/10 so it doesn't really make much difference. But for some games the difference between mean and median can be as much as 0.4/10, and in an industry where the current review structure puts a great deal of emphasis on the difference between an 8.6 game vs a 9.0 game (I just checked and the median score for PS3 Bayonetta is 90 whereas the metacritic score is 86) a 0.4 skewing by a few outlandishly low scores can be a big deal for some games.

I bet the median review score for HR will be 9/10 whereas the mean review score will be 8.7 - 8.8. Not a big deal perhaps but having that lovely looking 9 associated with a game is a rather nice to see for those who really like the game.


Couple things:

 

-Yes, the median is a better indicator of central tendency, as it is not effected by outliers.  Agree 100%

-Wasn't Bayonetta on PS3 a broken port?  That would seem a case of bad sampling if the median was so high...  unless I missed something.

-I think that the only place the median vs mean makes a real difference is when you're arguing whether something is a "AAA" game or not.  Unfortunately, Heavy Rain, while a great game, really ISN'T a AAA (for a movie style game, the plot is too ham-fisted at time, and some of the voice acting is horrible while some is superb....  it's too extreme one way or another to be that top notch), so that .2 is just and fair in this case.



Teletext are consistently below the average, sometimes significantly, with PS3 exclusives:

Uncharted 2 ---- 90 vs. 96 Meta
LittleBigPlanet ---- 90 vs. 95 Meta
MGS4 ---- 80 vs. 94 Meta
Killzone 2 ---- 70 vs. 91 Meta
Wipeout HD Fury ---- 80 vs. 89 Meta
Ninja Gaiden Sigma ---- 80 vs. 88 Meta
Heavy Rain ---- 40 vs. 88 Meta
Resistance 2 ---- 70 vs. 87 Meta
Flower ---- 70 vs. 87 Meta
Crack in Time ---- 70 vs. 87 Meta
Pixeljunk Shooter ---- 80 vs. 86 Meta
Valkyria Chronicles ---- 80 vs. 86 Meta
inFamous ---- 70 vs. 85 Meta
Fat Princess ---- 60 vs. 79 Meta
MAG ---- 70 vs. 76 Meta
EyePet ---- 60 vs. 70 Meta
Socom: Confrontation ---- 40 vs. 63 Meta


They've never given a 10/10 to a PS3 exclusive either.

The only games he scored higher than average are Disgaea 3 (80 vs. 78 Meta) and Noby Noby Boy (80 vs. 75 Meta).

Demon's Souls holds an 89 Meta and Teletext did review it, but it wasn't the normal reviewer and the guy in his place forgot to give it a score lol.



mhsillen said:
maximus22 said:
4/10... Seriously?!... 4/10?!
Even if you don't like the game at all, I can't think of any reason why this landmark game could possibly deserve this score. Sounds like a bonehead review to me.

Maybe the reviewer wants to play a videogame and not watch a movie and every once in awhile push a button.

 

tsk, tsk. someone didnt play the demo or didnt play the demo correctly and spent 12 seconds at the crime scene.



^^OR maybe the reviewer didn't find guns,terrorist and shooting in the game which they were expecting....



Kantor said:
Metacritic accepts some real jokes of review sites...

QFT

Also, Heavy Rain is the best western made game I have played in years.....