By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - 7 in 10 Americans believe Iran has Nuclear Weapons

megaman79 on 21 February 2010
sguy78 said:
megaman79 said:
sguy78 said:
megaman79 said:
sguy78 said:

I just find it funny that you can be so absolutely positive there were no WMD's in Iraq. We gave them two weeks of notice, and we have photos of numerous large trucks moving in the direction of Syria during said two weeks. Iran is obviously develpoing nuclear materials, and has said that Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth. The dictatorship just stole another election where the opposition lost his own town. Seems like a perfectly stable country to have nuclear weapons. How long can you stick your head in the sand while maniacle dictator stomp on their people? I bet you would have just gone along with the flow when Hitler stormed Poland too, huh?

Quoting for lulz.

 

Are you serious? Blair just testified 2 weeks ago and said "there was NO IMMINENT THREAT".

Yeah because it's so funny you deal only with absolutes. Only you can be right on every issue. When you decide to look at said pictures, do what you must always do, and just close your eyes. WMD's were one of numerous reasons the U.N. had to attack Saddam's Regime under the Peace Treaty following the Iraq War. It would have been under the "Umbrella" of unity if France hadn't veto'd it. Gee, they didn't happen to be covering up a certain Oil For Food program, were they? Stop acting like you are coming from some moral high ground, when a tyrant who used chemical weapons on women and children has been removed. Ever look at the mass graves of people that were found in Iraq, that were obvious assasinations? Wasn't one of the main purposes of the U.N. to stand in the way of attrocities such as those perpetrated during WW2?

Do you know anything about UN International Law? I studied it for a year. Do you know anything about why France didn't agree to support the invasion? No, you dont. Do you know about the highway of death? Not likely.

Do you know about the human rights abuses in Darfur, and the UN's inaction? Do you know about the first Iraq War, you know the one that was ACTUALLY about protecting a sovereign state, instead of invasion for no reason at all?

Again, lulz to your ignorance. Its funny stuff.

Why don't you start without the typical liberal practice of lashing out and insulting people that don't agree with you? Maybe you should wake up and realize France was skimming some money off the top pal. "If you don't agree with me you're an ignorant moron!" Waaaaaahhhh!!!!!!

I said you were ignorant about UN International law. I did not call you a moron. Clearly, and this is even after i provided a link which explains why you were wrong about UN support, you can not even acknowledge this. 

Still waiting for that one reason why Saddam deserved a premeditated and illegal (not my quote, the UN's) invasion. Let me know when you found it, because atleast these guys http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=101602&page=4&str=521761088#48 have something to offer.

 



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.

Around the Network
sguy78 on 21 February 2010
megaman79 said:
sguy78 said:
megaman79 said:
sguy78 said:
megaman79 said:
sguy78 said:

I just find it funny that you can be so absolutely positive there were no WMD's in Iraq. We gave them two weeks of notice, and we have photos of numerous large trucks moving in the direction of Syria during said two weeks. Iran is obviously develpoing nuclear materials, and has said that Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth. The dictatorship just stole another election where the opposition lost his own town. Seems like a perfectly stable country to have nuclear weapons. How long can you stick your head in the sand while maniacle dictator stomp on their people? I bet you would have just gone along with the flow when Hitler stormed Poland too, huh?

Quoting for lulz.

 

Are you serious? Blair just testified 2 weeks ago and said "there was NO IMMINENT THREAT".

Yeah because it's so funny you deal only with absolutes. Only you can be right on every issue. When you decide to look at said pictures, do what you must always do, and just close your eyes. WMD's were one of numerous reasons the U.N. had to attack Saddam's Regime under the Peace Treaty following the Iraq War. It would have been under the "Umbrella" of unity if France hadn't veto'd it. Gee, they didn't happen to be covering up a certain Oil For Food program, were they? Stop acting like you are coming from some moral high ground, when a tyrant who used chemical weapons on women and children has been removed. Ever look at the mass graves of people that were found in Iraq, that were obvious assasinations? Wasn't one of the main purposes of the U.N. to stand in the way of attrocities such as those perpetrated during WW2?

Do you know anything about UN International Law? I studied it for a year. Do you know anything about why France didn't agree to support the invasion? No, you dont. Do you know about the highway of death? Not likely.

Do you know about the human rights abuses in Darfur, and the UN's inaction? Do you know about the first Iraq War, you know the one that was ACTUALLY about protecting a sovereign state, instead of invasion for no reason at all?

Again, lulz to your ignorance. Its funny stuff.

Why don't you start without the typical liberal practice of lashing out and insulting people that don't agree with you? Maybe you should wake up and realize France was skimming some money off the top pal. "If you don't agree with me you're an ignorant moron!" Waaaaaahhhh!!!!!!

I said you were ignorant about UN International law. I did not call you a moron. Clearly, and this is even after i provided a link which explains why you were wrong about UN support, you can not even acknowledge this. 

Still waiting for that one reason why Saddam deserved a premeditated and illegal (not my quote, the UN's) invasion. Let me know when you found it, because atleast these guys http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=101602&page=4&str=521761088#48 have something to offer.

 

It's a caricature of your little insults when you get irritated. So, the U.N. called it illegal, it must be huh? You don't think thousands of those mass burial graves were no reason? Just kicking the U.N. weapons inspectors out was a valid reason. Shooting at our birds in the sky was valid. Saddam deserved his end, if you don't think so, maybe you two will meet someday.



TheRealMafoo on 21 February 2010

I know Iran does not have Nuclear weapons, because they have not used them yet.

Let me ask you this:
If the best future you could see, is blowing up Israel, and then being killed for it, what do you use as leverage to keep him from attacking?

He does not think like we do. Don't apply your logic to him.



Kasz216 on 21 February 2010
NiKKoM said:
Kasz216 said:
NiKKoM said:

Thats so wrong.. their name isn't actually the revolutionary guard but Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution.. it has retained it's "radical" ideology even though it has assumed the outward structure of a conventional military force... they follow the Islam..

And yes.. you do have to use super  missiles.. their longest range missile now can hit Turkey.. thats 1300KM which they claim it can hit it... http://www.jewishpolicycenter.org/blog/2009/12/iran-missile-can-hit-us-forward-bases-israel   Mainland Europe is like 4000KM.. that would be a super missile..

It's the slang name.  I know the actual name thanks.  They don't follow islam.

They train terrorists, they pay people to attack civlians... both in Israel and the west.

They would like nothing better then to take as many people out as they could when they were going down.  Palestinians included, because in reality, they don't give a damn about them.  The widespread support of palestine was nothing but a land grab for those countries nearby... and now is just to oppose their counterbalance.

So they are the loyal army of the clerics in Iran to counter the regular army of Iran and they don't follow Islam.. that's hard to believe.. it's even believed that they do their "terrorist" activitities to in hopes to spread the Islamic revolution..

Their terrorist activities that hurt innocents.