Reach is not even close.....yet another victim of hype created by Aaron Greenburg... that man needs to stop bad mouthing the competition and saying crazy things...
Reach actually does look pretty nice..but its no where near KZ2 in terms of visual quality...had Greenburg not mentioned about it, people wouldn't have cared much...after all...this is HALO...and visuals dont make a game..
Does the person that wrote this article not realize the 3rd Halo:Reach image is concept art?
I'll wait for something a little more 'technical' before drawing conclusions rather than 'this shot looks a bit better'.
I guess I better get used to this comparison, though, get the feeling it's going to come up a lot over the coming months.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...
I have to double post. Why is there a concept art pic in the comparison!! LOL! "this screenshot blah blah" HAHAHAHHA!
Those Killzone 2 pictures are fucking terrible
The game looks wayyyyyyyyyyyyy better
slowmo said:
I did actually check out their Mass Effect 1 vs 2 article to see what sort of site they were. When they stated in that article that Mass Effect 1 looked a little worse for having a grainy look to it, I quickly realised they don't have a clue about graphics. They might have at least bothered to learn you could turn the film grain effect off on Mass Effect 1 before writing a article. All in all I'd say they're just not very professional. |
Speaking of them being unprofessional...
I saw one of their other comparisons between God of War III and Dante's Inferno and in one of the sections, the compared an in game screenshot of Kratos to a CG screenshot of Dante and I dunno if they deliberately did that but they said Kratos looked much better. Yeh we know GOW III is fucking better in graphics than Dante's Inferno but man did they really need to compare an ingame screen to a CG screen? That made things so embarassing for them...
| voty2000 said: Comparing a pre-alpha build of a game against a final build is a little ridiculous. |
While true, it's not like that stopped all the stupid comparisons that plagued Killzone 2's development.
I don't know about which one looks better, but I just watched the developer's diary for Halo: Reach and I'm excited for the game.
For sure Killzone 2 is the one that looks better but it isn't a fair comparison, despite what some people say halo has never been that great graphical stunner....on the other hand Halo Reach seems to have improved much from halo 3.
The only console games comparable to Killzone 2 on graphics are uncharted 2 and Resident Evil 5 (the X360 version)
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
