| Emmitt2222 said: @fkus I, at the moment, play at very small stakes because I am switching from limit to NL, but for the most part, if I am not the best at the table I get worried. If I am third best at the table I should be playing very high stakes where there are no mega amounts of fish of I should be moving tables. Being third best at the table is a bad sign for the most part and you should not be comfortable. However position, especially in NL, is so important that if you have other good players at the table it may not matter, if you have one awful player to your right. It's a game of positions and varies table to table, but to be good at the game you also need to know what the best tables are. |
Okay, makes sense to me. My friend plays limit at the Borgata for a living and he has one game that he is really good at. The game rotates between hold'em, stud, Omaha and something else so a quarter of the time he is usually the best at the table. I guess his advice has to be put into some context. Thanks for that insight.












